By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
We are all watching Japan's nuclear fallout with ever-increasing alarm.
The Japanese government and all countries that are helping out in that country are trying to focus first and foremost on containing this crisis, protecting workers, and limiting exposure. That’s correct. The next step will be learning lessons from these events for the future of nuclear power.
When we get to that stage, I think it's very important to consider all the facts, put this terrible event in context, and let reason rather than emotion play the larger part in our judgment.
It's difficult not to get spooked by terms like "meltdown," "radiation clouds," and "radioactive leakage." But let's remember that nuclear reactors have operated peacefully, quietly, and safely for decades in countries from Japan to France to the United States.
Over the last five decades, there has been just one nuclear accident that caused any deaths at all - at Chernobyl, and that was a poorly designed reactor, unlike any of the ones in the United States or Japan. It had almost no safety codes or procedures.
The accident at 3 Mile Island in the United States did not actually kill anyone. There was no significant radiation leakage because in the US – as in Japan – all reactors have steel or concrete containers to prevent such leakage. That's why there were no illness resulting from radiation after the 3 Mile island accident.
And the new plants that have been built in the last decade are safer – the OECD says 1,600 times safer than the old ones. And the 3rd generation reactors being planned now, which will be built later, are safer even than those.
Now, all energy sources have their risks when being extracted.
Oil and coal have far worse safety records than even decades-old nuclear plants. The BP oil spill, for example, was triggered by an explosion that instantly killed 11 workers and then poured 4 millions barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
In a thoughtful article in Slate, Will Saletan does the math and finds that if you add up all the deaths caused by oil explosions and the like, the rate of death per unit of energy extracted is 18 times worse for oil than it is for nuclear energy. With hundreds of people dying in mining accidents, coal is also much more likely to kill people working on it or around it than nuclear. And none of this counts the millions of people who get diseases and die a premature death thanks to pollution.
I know there is something about nuclear power that worries us. But it's important not to make huge public policy decisions based on perception rather than reality.
When a plane crashes and hundreds of people die, we immediately panic and worry about flying. But we tend to forget that almost 50,000 Americans die every year in accidents on highways, making the act of getting into your car by far the most dangerous thing that an American will do every day.
We need all the sources of energy we can find. No one source is going to satisfy the world's energy needs. Every one has some costs and some benefits. Nuclear energy can be scaled and it is clean.
We need to design the safest possible plants with the maximum number of back-up procedures. So far, that is the lesson we should draw from this tragedy in Japan.
I haven't heard anyone ask what the impact of the radiation fall-out will be on the oceans around the reactors, and the impact on fish, which we will all eat?
Minute marine life very close to Fukushima Daichi may succumb. Some will pass up to the food chain. Some whales may bio accumulate significant contamination. Stop eating whales from the ocean near north Japan for a few years, just to be completely safe. Is that too hard? I am not a marine life expert, so get a second opinion if you are seriously worried.
By the way, are you okay with eating the fish from the Gulf?
Quote: ""Over the last five decades, there has been just one nuclear accident that caused any deaths at all – at Chernobyl,...""
There seems to be a "slight" discrepancy between the statement by FZ and the factsheets in Wikipedia.
I'll let everyone jump to his or her own conclusions :)
I am surprised at all the deaths from radiotherapy!
Rooftop solar does make sense. Ours produces between 60 and 70% of the electricity used in the home. Yes, it was expensive to install, but on energy savings alone, and assuming no price increase, the break even point on the out-of-pocket costs is around seven years. Granted, the out-of-pocket costs are the result of substantial subsidies in the form of a federal tax credit and a state rebate. But, as with anything else, as economies of scale kick in and as more efficient panels can be made, costs will go down (incidentally, labor costs to install were more than half of the total expenses, and here in northern Illinois, putting just about any construction worker to work is sorely needed).
Nuclear has its place, but it is not the panacea its proponents want it to be. The risks are really immense. The waste product issue is unanswered. The costs per kwh generated are by far the most expensive of any of the three major forms of generation. Those costs are only going up when the "occassional" disaster is factored into the equation.
If a fraction of what the country is willing to spend on nuclear was devoted toward developing solar and wind, both of those technologies would quickly develop, and be able to substantially contribute to an overall power grid that works towards being green, and towards getting away from fossil fuel dependancy – a dependancy, in the case of oil, that should include at least some of the expenses of our wars when calculating what it really costs.
Well, probably Japan has the safest standard for many including nuclear plants in the world, but this accident happened even though unbelievably huge earthquakes and tsunami caused this event.
Probably Japan's plat was the safest, but 3/11 tragedy proved that natural disaster could be far beyond human technology. This happened in not poor or undevelopped countries but Japan!!
If the same happen to the US, the situation could be worse.
I do not think we should stop building new nuclear plants because we need and they are relatively clean.
However, we should know true knowledges without getting confused by the medias which tell us only the worst case of Fukushima. We should learn from Fukushima, and we should make even safer plant.
I have read every single post in this thread and have been contemplating the nuclear matter for some time, consuming all information and opinions available. I am not an expert, but a concerned citizen.
I have two simple questions for proponents of nuclear power:
1) Is it possible, at all, that another disaster such as Chernobyl could happen in any operating nuclear plants, or in future plants yet to be designed and built?
2) If such an event were to occur, are we willing to leave the result as heritage to our descendants, for any justification we should see fit to provide?
I think the answer to the first question is "yes", and the answer to the second question is "no". Therefore, all cost-benefits aside, I cannot in good conscience approve, support, or quietly abide nuclear power generation.
Many other arguments, on both sides, are compelling – when taken in part. But holistically, I believe the two questions I have offered are entirely sufficient to quell any dissent on the matter, in that a given person will answer yes+yes, no+no, yes+no, or no+yes, and no further discussion is required about the facts – at this point we have gotten to the heart of the matter and identified the fundamental difference between the "pro" and "con" camps.
If it is true that "nothing is better", than "nothing" it is to be, indeed...
... but fortunately, that's not really true. Right?
Even the worst risks from alternative sources, when given the same test, answer "yes" and "yes" – that is, I would leave my descendants with the worst oil disaster imaginable (for example) for the justifications we will offer them. Along the spectrum of preferability, there is a "yes" somewhere for all the other sources except nuclear.
Here're my own calculations:
According to Wikipedia, humans use approximately 150,000 TWh of energy (not just electricity) every year.
At 250 days of sun for 8 hours a day, a "1-watt solar panel" generates 2KWh of electricity per year.
Divide these two figures (demand by production) and you get a required supply of 75 trillion 1-watt panels.
Real panels come in larger denominations, such as industrial KW panels. So we would need 75 billion such real-world panels.
You can buy – no bulk discount or economy of scale – a solar panel at $1.76 per watt. Double this cost for all overhead.
Total expenditure: less than $250 trillion, for 100% of the world's energy needs, not just electricity. If they last for 25 years (minimum lifetime of a solar plant at >80% of rated capacity) then the cost is $10 trillion per year.
That is equivalent to 13% of annual GWP ($10 trillion out of $75 trillion); we currently spend 10-14% of GDP on energy depending on who you ask.
I think this sounds like a fine plan to me.
You're right, Fareed, let's hold off on the judgment for now.
Fareed's "Take" on nuclear power sounds like it came straight from the Nuclear Energy Institute. Talking points! Corporate PR blather that is designed to prevent a serious discussion about nuclear power in the U.S. And that's precisely what the industry wants - no discussion. Just tell us that since no one has been killed (directly) by one of the (many) nuclear plant accidents over the past 40 years that it's safe. Oops! Sorry. This is not about how many people have died (or will die) so much as it is about the industry's ability to safely operate an aging fleet of plants that include nearly 3 dozen similar to Fukushima's. I have lost a huge amount of respect for Fareed Zakaria (and for CNN) for running a commercial for the nuclear industry, masquerading as informed commentary from an independent journalist.
Wow Fareed, very SELECTIVE information here. Suspiciously so. I usually agree and respect your opinions and insights. But after this blatant commercial for the Nuclear Energy Institute, you have soiled yourself.
How about how many innocent victims result from radioactive leaks? Do your research and see what horror STILL EXISTS in Russia to this day. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster
Nuclear energy is NEITHER CLEAN OR SAFE. That is the truth. There's no other way to spin it.
Hi, just read through your info and would like to subscribe for extra, do you have a rss feed?
You got quite a few more people excited than I now have been able to. I hope we end up with more people o board and also moving here in all of your right direction.beats studio ferrari headphones
I will be able to see the diehards here in the home really attending to all your point of holding out as well as not raising all your debt ceiling. beats by dr dre
if you have monster pro spotted an especially famous Da Vinci painting you want, you should make monster beats michael jackson contact with an artist who's an expert within this field.
Greenblatt presents profitable » How To Write and Publish Short Story Fiction For Free Or Pretty Darn Close posted at profitable, saying, "Fiction is a really hard market to break into but it is harder
This is an excellent blog post. You get my vote and I will bookmark this weblog right now.
People who choose the michael jackson beats pre-filled cartridges have a 2-piece justbeats solo ecigarette. The reason being the cartridge has already been justin bieber solo attached to the atomizer successfully. The connector is known as "cartomizer". Pre-filled cartridges have a definite E-liquid solution.
HPV which causes genital warts monster beats lamborghini shouldn't be taken lightly. The issue is that monster beats ferrari at times you won't just end up getting genital warts, monster beats red sox you could get cancer.
Thanks , I have just been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I've discovered till now. However, what concerning the conclusion? Are you sure concerning the supply?|What i don't realize is in truth how you're now not really a lot more neatly-liked than you might be right now. You're very intelligent.
How long time have you been disturbed by the rings of cell phones around you, but you have nothing to do with the boring situation? As a man, born into this modern society, we have been gifted with the right appropriate for many different things, especially something related with the science and technology, such as the internet's controller-computer which has been used globally. Besides, another important one belongs to the mobile phones world. No matter where on the street, in the market or at home, you will see a cell phone everywhere. What's more, cell phone calls almost follow you all the time, no matter you are having a dinner or hold a important meeting or some other essential occasions cell phone calls are not needed. But the truth is human beings seem to be able to do nothing without a cell phone beside them. Step by step, one after another one, cell phones is replaced into new ones. You will know the magic power of Iphone. How many guys are crazy about this modern device?
Although cell phones really benefit us a lot, especially on the area of communication. We make calls or send messages to know the information of our friends. We listen to music or watch videos to relax ourselves or even we surf the internet with the gadget, which is OK. But there still some places and some situations phones are not welcomed. What should you do when facing with the situation? You will ask another device for help- cell phone jammer which is specially designed for temporarily blocking the transmission of signals between the cell phone and its nearby base station. When you turn on the button and see the light on, there will be the sign of "no service "or "no signals" on the screen of cell phones, which means that you have successfully finished the whole process. When you need to use your mobile phone as normal, just turn it off.
Until now, the cell phone jammer has been widely used, such as examination rooms, jails, courts, meeting rooms, libraries, theatres, churches, gas stations, hospitals and so on. In a word, where there needs secret or silence, there it will be. If you find you are troubled by the dins of phones for a long time, it is your time to change your life into a better one. Go directly and get a cell phone signal blocker now.
As for how to buy cell phone jammer, following are some tips to be remembered. Firstly, make sure your local frequency before you buy one. Because different areas have different frequencies, so need a suitable cell phone jammer to match. Secondly, buy one from online stores, you know it is illegal in many countries to deal with the business about jammer, but not online, so it is wise to choose one from http://www.alljammers.com a great online store. Thirdly, make sure the quality and price of the product when you decide to purchase, can make a comparison before your decision. Also some other details you need to know.
http://www.pradafactory.com/ プラダ バッグ
http://www.pradafactory.com/ プラダ 財布
Hi there, simply turned into aware of your weblog through Google, and located that it's really informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will be grateful in the event you proceed this in future. Many people can be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!
Woah this weblog is magnificent i like reading your posts. Keep up the good work! You realize, many individuals are looking round for this information, you could aid them greatly.
Great put up, very informative. I ponder why the other experts of this sector don't realize this. You should proceed your writing. I'm confident, you've a huge readers' base already!|What's Going down i'm new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely helpful and it has aided me out loads. I'm hoping to give a contribution & aid different users like its helped me. Great job.
I'm really impressed along with your writing skills as smartly as with the format on your weblog. Is this a paid topic or did you modify it yourself? Either way stay up the excellent quality writing, it is uncommon to see a nice weblog like this one nowadays..
I'm really inspired along with your writing skills and also with the format in your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it your self? Either way keep up the excellent high quality writing, it's uncommon to see a nice blog like this one nowadays..
My brother suggested I may like this website. He was once totally right. This publish truly made my day. You cann't imagine simply how a lot time I had spent for this information! Thank you!
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,853 other followers