Will killing bin Laden also kill support for the war in Afghanistan?
May 4th, 2011
09:49 AM ET

Will killing bin Laden also kill support for the war in Afghanistan?

Editor’s Note: Dr. Nora Bensahel is Deputy Director of Studies and a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security in Washington, D.C.

By Nora Bensahel, Special to CNN

After President Obama announced that Osama bin Laden had been killed, crowds spontaneously gathered near the World Trade Center site and the White House to mark the occasion.  For them and many other Americans, this news resurrected the emotions and memories of that terrible day almost 10 years ago.  It provided a long-sought feeling of closure, and a sense that this particular chapter in American history has ended.

Those deeply-felt sentiments will place increasing pressure on President Obama to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan sooner rather than later.  The war in Afghanistan has always been justified as a necessary response to the September 11 attacks.  On October 11, 2001 – three days after the United States began military operations in Afghanistan – President George W. Bush clearly told the American people, “This particular battlefield will last as long as it takes to bring al Qaeda to justice.”

On May 1, 2011, President Obama declared, “Justice has been done.”

Of course, the war in Afghanistan was never solely about killing or capturing bin Laden. The United States sought to overthrow the Taliban because it had allowed bin Laden to operate inside Afghanistan.

Once that occurred in December 2001, the objective shifted to building a new Afghan government that would be capable of controlling its territory so that al Qaeda and other terrorist groups could no longer use the country as a base of operations.  That objective still has not been achieved.

Although notable progress has been made, the United States and its NATO allies have affirmed that they will maintain forces in Afghanistan until the end of 2014, even though some troops will start withdrawing this July.

Bin Laden’s death will make it increasingly difficult for the Obama administration to continue pursuing this policy.  American support for the war in Afghanistan had already declined to its lowest levels in years even before this news broke. Shortly after President Obama took office, 63 percent of those polls said that they approved of the way that he was handling the situation in Afghanistan, but the most recent poll shows that only 44 percent agree with that statement today.

Public disapproval almost doubled during that same time, from 26 percent to 49 percent. Now that bin Laden is dead, even those who recently supported the war may now believe that the war’s main goals have been achieved and it is time for U.S. forces to come home.

Obama will face an uphill battle convincing Americans – and some members of Congress – that U.S. strategic interests still require spending billions of dollars a month on military operations in Afghanistan.

Maintaining a U.S. robust military presence in Afghanistan through 2014 would help strengthen the Afghan government and security forces and increase the chances that they will be able to control their territory after that time, but if public support for the war further declines now that bin Laden is dead, the worst outcome would be for the United States to continue investing large amounts of blood and treasure without staying in Afghanistan long enough to reap the benefits.

It is not yet clear what path the president will choose to pursue.  If he still believes that U.S. strategic interests are at stake in Afghanistan, he must clearly and repeatedly articulate why those interests still matter to an increasingly skeptical American public – especially since U.S. casualties will inevitably rise as the summer fighting season in Afghanistan begins in earnest.

He also must be willing to risk losing the increase in his approval rating that he will undoubtedly gain from having acted so swiftly, decisively and effectively against bin Laden.

In the short term, however, the administration may well choose to withdraw a larger number of U.S. troops from Afghanistan in July than it originally intended.  Doing so would reinforce this recent victory over al Qaeda and, more importantly, demonstrate to the American public that the war in Afghanistan is truly starting to wind down.

Post by:
Topics: Afghanistan • Osama bin Laden • Pakistan

soundoff (5 Responses)
  1. RAJ

    We should trust Obama's decision as Commmaner in Chief to keep military force in Afghanistan or not. This President is intelligent and man of actoin. This, he proved by attacking and killing Bin Laden. There are so many high level terrorist in Pakistan, there are so many terrorist groups and there camps in Pakistan. Pakistan is a superficial friend of USA for there need and in reality Pakistani hates USA and India the most. Pakistan is mischievious and notorious country, not reliable county there atomic bombs are excessible to terrorist. We got to keep more check on Pakistan rather than Afghanistan now. We need USA and NATO troops in Afghanistan to stop Mullah Omar and other terrorist groups moving back to Afghanistan with support of ISI. We flew naval helicopters with commandos to attacked Bin Laden place from Afganistan and many drone attacks were from Afghanistan. We have stategic important of Afghanistan to keep close watch on Pakistani political leaders who are working totally under the influence of dishonest ISI and lying all the time.

    May 4, 2011 at 11:46 am | Reply
  2. Sharefacts

    Mission Accomplished, OBL Killed as stated when invading Afghanistan. BRING TROOPS HOME NOW.

    May 4, 2011 at 12:11 pm | Reply
    • Onesmallvoice

      You might as well forget it. The right-wing thugs in Washington will find another excuse to keep us in there because they want to exploit that country's resources.

      May 4, 2011 at 1:28 pm | Reply
  3. j. von hettlingen

    As I once said, the problems with the Taliban and the frail regime in Afghanistan interlinks with the policy-making in Pakistan. I am not sure, which national interests the neighbouring countries around Afghanistan have, Maybe other than the poor Afghans themselves, no country in the region want to have a stable Afghanistan.

    May 4, 2011 at 4:10 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.