Editor's Note: The "Global Innovation Showcase" is a special feature created by the New America Foundation, a non-partisan, future-oriented think tank based in Washington DC, and the Global Public Square. Tune in tonight at 8pm ET/PT for a special edition of CNN GPS, "Restoring the American Dream: How to Innovate."
By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union shocked the world by launching a tiny satellite, about the size of a beach ball, called Sputnik. It weighted about 200 pounds and circled the Earth in a little under two hours.
America was shocked to find itself behind in the space race and began to put energy, effort and billions of dollars into science, technology and innovation. Less than 12 years after Sputnik, Americans landed on the moon.
Now, a decade into the 21st Century President Obama in his last State of the Union speech declared: “This is our generation's Sputnik moment. We need to out-innovate, out-educate and out-build the rest of the world.”
In his State of the Union address, President Obama mentioned the word “innovation” nine times, more than any other president ever has. And on this issue most of his opponents agree. Listen to Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich or Mitch Daniels and the word innovation pops up again and again. Everyone wants innovation and agrees that it is the key to America's future.
The Soviet Union is gone, but other nations have taken its place, challenging our longstanding supremacy as the world's leading innovator.
How well are we meeting the challenge? In a recent ranking of 40 countries' efforts to foster innovation over the past decade, guess where the United States ranked? Dead last.
This year China is projected to outpace the U.S. in the number of patents it files. That's the first time any other country has overtaken the United States.
The spirit of enterprise, innovation, pioneering and derring-do propelled America standard of living and economy beyond any other nation in the world.
Indeed, as I wrote in TIME this week, “Innovation is as American as apple pie. It seems to accord with so many elements of our national character — ingenuity, freedom, flexibility, the willingness to question conventional wisdom and defy authority. But politicians are pinning their hopes on innovation for more urgent reasons. America's future growth will have to come from new industries that create new products and processes."
"Older industries are under tremendous pressure. Technological change is making factories and offices far more efficient. The rise of low-wage manufacturing in China and low-wage services in India is moving jobs overseas. The only durable strength we have — the only one that can withstand these gale winds — is innovation.”
But how can we move beyond the political rhetoric and get America back on track to being “Innovator #1 in the 21st Century?”
I argue that "Ultimately, innovation cannot work without both significant government support and a vibrant and dynamic private sector that allows people to experiment, fail and try again."
We’ve got an impressive lineup of innovation experts to give you their answers on TV and online.
Tonight at 8pm ET/PT, there will be a special edition of CNN GPS, “Restoring the American Dream: How to Innovate” with:
– Google Executive Chairman, Eric Schmidt
– The head of the U.S. military’s crack team of innovators, Dr. Regina Dugan
– Author, Steven Johnson
– Economist Paul Romer
– Venture capitalist Len Baker
– And innovation maven John Kao
I’ll be live tweeting the "How to Innovate" special with #Innovate with @StevenbjJohnson and @JohnKao. You can follow along @FareedZakaria.
And I’m thrilled to announce the launch of the “Global Innovation Showcase” on our website. With the New America Foundation, we will feature the big ideas, trends and inventions that shape our world – and change how we play, do business and even think.
To get us started online, we have
– John Kao asking Is America Still an Innovation Nation and explaining What is Innovation anyway.
– Author Zachary Karabell on the Innovation Challenge Posed by China.
– Author Steven Johnson offers A Brief History of Innovation.
– And Professor Anne-Marie Slaughter writes an excellent piece entitled Rebellion of an Innovation Mom.
As always, I am keen on hearing your big ideas and insights, so share them online in the comment thread, on Facebook or through iReport.
Innovation is great! But not when it benefits the competition more than the innovator. I believe we are asking the wrong questions. Instead of how can we innovate more? How can we make our innovation benefit us? Example: Apple, what would it take to bring the manufacturing of the I-Phone or I-Pad, I-whatever HERE? Home. How do we do it? We have about the right amount of innovation but now we need the jobs to implement what we have innovated..
Energy is the problem. There is not enough energy (oil, coal, nuclear sustainable solar) in the world to sustain the human population in a manner commensurate with basic human dignity.
I have sent this potential innovation to every one I can think of.
It may be viewed as in the context of Albert Einstein’s letter to President Franklin Roosevelt (but only peaceful intentions).
And it is a continuation of that effort (Manhatan Project and succeeding efforts) recently expressed in the National Ignition Facility, Livermore, California.
As a civilian engineering professional
with many years studying the nexus
between cosmological and earthly engineering/scientific principles,
I join with the United States Tax Paying public
in congratulating the diverse people
associated with the continued Department of Energy, National Ignition Facility (NIF)
in engineering a successful platform for classified nuclear stockpile verification
but more importantly,
in engineering a complementary non classified fundamental research vehicle
for potentially obtaining new required energy
to drive the world's economy
in a manner worthy of humans' best aspirations.
A new energy source is necessary
as evidenced by any judicious evaluation
of current and anticipated world energy per capita usage.
As the late Nobel Prize recipient, Dr. Richard Smalley, Rice University said:
'We need 10 technological miracles to obtain the required energy'.
NIF may provide a few of these miracles
(Maybe the current preliminary NIF experiments already
hint at one of these required technological miracles)
Because of its unique design,
The National Ignition Facility(NIF) is the only ongoing world class experiment
capable of developing something fundamentally scientifically new.
I do not mean NIF's use as impinging
its spatially oriented 192 laser beams on to a hydrogen mass target.
I mean spatially oriented laser interaction(no hydrogen mass target)
for Schwinger Pair Production
as conceptually described by Julian Schwinger before the time of lasers
(Julian Schwinger, On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization, Phys. Rev. 82, 664–679 (1951))
and the study of such pair production from vacuum
as a potential energy source.
Engineered Schwinger Pair Production
means integrating a widely diverse technology base
from astrophysics (Big Bang nucleosynthesis)
to earth based laser engineering as per NIF.
I do think the Schwinger Pair Production mechanistic answer
to energy production
is staring us in the face
from the whispering vastness of astrophysical space
with data compiled by latest satellites (WAMP, PLANCK)
waiting to be engineered at earth scale
at a facility such as NIF and its successors.
Within this scientific context, I have one continuing question?:
In the operation of the newly commissioned National Ignition Facility,
has any gamma-ray radiation been detected
at the intersection of spatially oriented laser beams
without intervening target hydrogen mass
indicating a Schwinger pair production
and particularly at an energy of 56 MeV?
It is recognized that the NIF reactor is not optimally setup
for Schwinger pair production but
selected laser beams from the 192 angled available NIF lasers
hold out the hope
of providing the correct symmetry
to create an observed energy at 56 MeV
(from vacuum and no target mass).
This 56 MeV creation would be a direct indication for Schwinger pair existence
and provide the basis for further Schwinger pair production optimization (in vacuo)
and at a much lower energy than predicted at the
Extreme Light Infrastructure (ELI) facility
with its extremely high but linear laser intensity of order 1×10^26 watt/cm^2.
The angled impinging lasers are a unique feature to NIF.
Optimal Schwinger Pair Production is anticipated
in a standing wave intersecting laser geometry
as per Figure 4.3, 4.4,
a geometry that would modify the vacuum permeability, permittivity
and implement Schwinger pair production in a Critical Optical Volume Energy(COVE)
at much lower incident energies than previously predicted (ELI)
and potentially be a source of energy exceeding the laser input energy.
WHY NOT LOOK? My extremely limited and diverse credentials
in the necessarily unclassified public domain
may be an asset to this civilian energy quest.
At your service & All the best,
Richard De Los Saam Licensed Professional Engineer, TX & CA
| LCDR – Ret USNR – NFO TACCO P3 ORION
| Patrol Plane Celestial Navigator (2541.5 Hrs)
| (in the spirit of Nathaniel Bowditch)
| BS chemistry – Loras College 1968
| MS Engineering – Stanford University 1974
| Government Service (GS) NAVFAC CEL 1975 – 1980
| Independent Scientific Study and
| Professional Engineering 1980-Present
| Home: 525 Louisiana Ave
| Corpus Christi, TX 78404
| 361 944 1670
Superconductivity, The Structure Scale of the Universe (Fourteenth Edition)
(Elastic Resonant Symmetric Medium by Self-Energy)
(Coherent Rabi Oscillations)
(Schwinger Pair Production of Virtual Particles)
Richard D. Saam, Corpus Christi, Texas
The biggest problem is the military tries to weaponize every new invention they can thus taking it out of the public sector.
What happened to to water fueled car that was tested and driven by the inventor on a long road trip? Not long after the inventor showed it to the military he suddenly died and all of his work disappeared into the black hole we call the pentagon. WHY??
I believe the oil industry saw this and killed him off and destroyed his work to keep us burning oil as our fuel. That is just one case. I know of hundreds of inventors who are afraid to even try to patent their work because of this.
Most are afraid of the patent process and the paperwork nightmare that corporations have made it to maintain their control of the invention process. The military industrial complex and corporate America controls the patent office.
Until the patent application process is made easier and FREE for all Americans, China will beat us out every time.
America ceased being great when the corporations took over.
National high speed rail infrastructure will result in the creation of 1MM jobs; construction, architectural, manufacturing, service industry... Using China as a model one can fairly accurately predict the number of jobs that will be greated in all 50 states
Cost Savings: Legislative Branch
1. reset salaries of congressmen an senators to be equal to that of the average salary in the state that they represent
2. replace the federal governments health care insurance program for each of congressmen and senators with their respective state's healthcare insurance that they represent, including individual policies
3. reset the pension plans which the congressmen and senators receive to be no greater than the average pension plan in the states which they represent and to be no greater than 50% of their highest salary after 20 years of service
1. N.I.H.: restructure N.I.H. into a single entity from the 21 fiefdoms currently in place; i.e. implement Dr. Berndaine Healy's strategic cross cutting plan for N.I.H.
2. N.S.F.: reduce budget by 20%; this will help eliminate the old boys club
3. FDA: restructure FDA into two independent agencies, integrating the USDA into the food agency
4. DARPA: restructure DARPA into an independent agency reporting directly to the White House's office of OSTP
5. Restructure EPA into functional independent groups
Job Creation: On average it takes industry 2.5 years to obtain a new order from a customer therefore industrial job expansion on average will take 3 to five years. New products take on average 12 to 20 years before they are commercialized; "post its" 17 years, microwave ovens 20 years.
WAKE UP JOB CREATION IS NOT PLUG AND PLAY. IT WILL TAKE AT LEAST 5 YEARS TO RECOVER FROM THE END OF THE RECESSION
On average it takes industry 2.5 years to obtain a new order from a customer therefore industrial job expansion on average will take 3 to five years. New products take on average 12 to 20 years before they are commercialized; "post its" 17 years, microwave ovens 20 years.
I will immediately grab your rss feed as I can not to find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you've any? Kindly let me know so that I could subscribe. Thanks.
Wow, fantastic blog layout! The time have you been blogging for? you've made blogging look easy. The general look of your respective website is great, together with the content!
I have a tendancy to be lazy sith commenting, but i adore your blog and i may well too say it correct now.
An exceptional read, thank you. It is obtaining harder and harder to sift via all the garbage on the web these days.
These days there is too much garabage written on blogs, glad to see your blog has kept it is integrety. Thanks
An superb read, thank you. It really is getting harder and harder to sift via all of the garbage on the internet these days.
I have a tendancy to be lazy sith commenting, but i adore your blog and i may as well say it proper now.
I normally hate commenting, but i thought i would give it a go for this blog. Been reading your stuff for awhile.
I'm really impressed together with your writing talents as neatly as with the format to your blog. Is that this a paid subject matter or did you modify it your self? Either way stay up the nice quality writing, it's rare to peer a nice blog like this one nowadays..
I just couldn't leave your website prior to suggesting that I really loved the standard information a person supply to your guests? Is going to be again continuously to investigate cross-check new posts
Its like you learn my thoughts! You appear to know so much approximately this, like you wrote the e-book in it or something. I think that you just could do with some percent to force the message house a little bit, however instead of that, this is magnificent blog. A fantastic read. I will certainly be back.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,862 other followers