Three challenges for new IMF director
Christine Lagarde. (Getty Images)
June 29th, 2011
11:03 AM ET

Three challenges for new IMF director

Editor's NoteSteven Dunaway is an Adjunct Senior Fellow for International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations. This is his Expert Brief.

By Steven Dunaway

Christine Lagarde's appointment to replace Dominique Strauss-Kahn as managing director of the International Monetary Fund comes as no real surprise. But the aggressive manner in which European authorities pushed through Lagarde's appointment to retain control over the position creates at least three major challenges Lagarde must quickly address.

One, Lagarde has to establish her independence.

She has to demonstrate that the IMF will not automatically rubberstamp European decisions and be a convenient piggy bank to help Europe finance the debt crisis in some euro-area countries. The pressure European officials applied to secure the managing director's position for Lagarde and the important role she played as the French finance minister in dealing with the crisis raises suspicions that the Europeans' primary interest in backing her is to ensure access to IMF resources.

Read: CFR.org background on the role of the IMF in a changing world.

Thus far, the IMF has provided roughly one-third of the 270 billion euros pledged for the rescue packages for Greece, Ireland, and Portugal. Euro-area countries will be looking for the IMF to provide a similar share of any new rescue package for Greece and for any assistance that may be needed for Spain. Lagarde has to dispel these suspicions.

Moreover, Lagarde needs to show she can stand up to European leaders and tell them hard truths about the economic situation in the crisis countries and that she is willing to call for policy changes (like debt restructuring or currency devaluation) that they may not want. She also has to make clear that the IMF will stop lending if its loan conditions are not being consistently met. Greece is likely to test the IMF's resolve if it continues to miss its fiscal targets and underperform in implementing economic reforms.

Two, like her three immediate predecessors, Lagarde has emphasized the need to enhance the legitimacy of the IMF by giving emerging-market countries increased voting shares and greater representation on the executive board commensurate with their growing importance in the world economy.

Over the past decade, only limited progress has been made in this regard, largely because of the reluctance of the smaller European countries that are over represented in the IMF. In acquiescing to Lagarde's appointment, emerging-market countries are likely to be expecting a resolution to this issue. She will have to come up relatively quickly with a plan that can win support by enough of the IMF's major members to be implemented by the executive board. Otherwise, she runs the risk of growing dissatisfaction and disillusionment among the IMF's important emerging-market members.

Three, Lagarde will have to demonstrate she can effectively manage the work of the IMF.

She has limited formal training in economics, especially compared to her recent predecessors. The decision not to consider the candidacy of Stanley Fischer because the IMF's executive board was unwilling to waive an age limit - a move it has taken in the past - underscores concerns. It leaves the impression that it would have been difficult to justify Lagarde's selection over such a distinguished and experienced economist and policymaker as Fischer, a former IMF first deputy managing director and Israeli citizen.

Read: Sebastian Mallaby on why Lagarde was the wrong choice to head the IMF.

There are questions as to whether Lagarde will be able to sort through the arguments on both sides of critical economic issues and decide what are the most appropriate policy recommendations that the IMF should be advocating. Moreover, once decisions are made, Lagarde's lack of detailed economic knowledge and understanding could make it difficult for her to sell reluctant country leaders on the need for economic policy changes.

It has been suggested that Lagarde's successful tenure as French finance minister illustrates her ability to handle the job of IMF managing director. But questions persist because the IMF handles a far wider range of issues than most finance ministries.

An effective IMF chief is crucial at a time when the fund is grappling with a set of critical and complex issues. The fund has a central role to play in distilling the lessons from the recent world economic and financial crisis and helping to formulate more effective regulation and supervision to make financial markets worldwide more secure. The IMF also stands at the center of efforts to reform the international financial system to enhance stability in the world economy. In addition, with little progress made in correcting the global economic imbalance that fostered the crisis, the IMF still needs to step up efforts to persuade the major countries to take necessary policy action to correct these imbalances and put the world economy on a more rapid and sustainable growth path.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of Steven Dunaway. Read more at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Post by:
Topics: Economy • Europe • Global

soundoff (4 Responses)
  1. j. von hettlingen

    That Christine Largarde was named as the new head of IMF helps repair France's battered image after the sex-scandal of Strauss-Kahn. It can also be seen as a political victory for Sarko, that he is assertive and still has clout on the international stage, which undoubtedly will boost the chances of his re-elcetion.
    Give Madame Lagarde a chance. I believe she would go a good job. By the time she leaves, the EURO-crisis would be over and the world will be ready to see a non-European to succeed her.

    June 29, 2011 at 11:51 am | Reply
  2. Charles London England

    Charles London England

    Attn: To Cnn board of directors: When will CNN do documantary about this story: The Greek Volunteer Guard (Serbian: Grčka Dobrovoljačka Garda, Greek: Ελληνική Εθελοντική Φρουρά) was a unit of Greek volunteers that fought in the Bosnian War on the side of Bosnian Serbs. Members of the unit allegedly participated in the Srebrenica Massacre and after the city fell hoisted a Greek flag over the town on Ratko Mladić's instigation.

    Some of the volunteers had links with Chrysi Avyi (Χρυσή Αυγή, "Golden Dawn"), a Greek neo-Nazi organisation,[3] and others were mercenaries. They were allegedly motivated to support their "Orthodox brothers" in battle.[4] Archbishop Seraphim of Athens had invited Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadžić to visit Athens in 1993.
    when will US President Barack Obama and Merkel and other western countries do something about Bosnia-Herz. These nations made and financed genocide founded in 1995 Republika srpska and gave half of Bosnia to serbs in Dytone oH and now Bosnia is only state in Balkans that is disfunctunal because serbs are blocking all reforms.USA, and UE should be ashamed because they let this happen…republika srpska should be abolished and Bosnia should only decentrelized on non-ethnic majority regions… 5 or ten regions with one capital, one police…like this situaton now milosevic’s dream came true, and Dodik is making BiH hostage ratko maladic was a serbian chetnick,and his father was too, and his grand-father was also….members 150,000 of serbian army and republica srbska army; killed,wounded,and raped over 250,000 Bosnians citizens (Bosniaks,Croats, and Serbs in Bosnia-Herzegovina) between 1992-1995…Republica Srpska is founded on genocide and most Mladic (that serbia protected till 2011) shelled citizens of Sarajevo and served in Serbian army that killed and raped……Serbia and its people, leadership protected Karadzic and Mladic and gave them army pansions while they lived in Belgrade...now president of republika srpska is planing to make genocide republica srpska independent by mid 2012 with help of russian and serbian mafia...there is papers, documents and people in balagrade and balkans that know all about this

    June 29, 2011 at 2:45 pm | Reply
  3. Spooge

    She needs to be thrown in front of a truck.

    June 30, 2011 at 4:54 pm | Reply
  4. BillyBob

    Challenge #1: shave underarms and legs.

    July 1, 2011 at 5:58 am | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,738 other followers