Editor's Note: Mohamed El-Erian, CEO and co-CIO of PIMCO, is the author of When Markets Collide. For more from El-Erian, visit Project Syndicate or follow it on Facebook and Twitter.
By Mohamed El-Erian
NEWPORT BEACH – I don’t know about you, but whenever I am in an airplane experiencing turbulence, I draw comfort from the belief that the pilots sitting behind the cockpit’s closed door know what to do. I would feel very differently if, through an open door, I observed pilots who were frustrated at the poor responsiveness of the plane’s controls, arguing about their next step, and getting no help whatsoever from the operator’s manuals.
So it is unsettling that policymakers in many Western economies today resemble the second group of pilots. This perception reflects not only the contradictory pronouncements and behavior of policymakers, but also the extent to which economic outcomes have consistently fallen short of their expectations.
This perception is evident in Europe, the United States, and Japan, where indicators of economic sentiment are deteriorating again, already-weak recoveries are stalling, and over-stretched balance sheets are becoming even more precarious. Understandably, companies and households are becoming even more cautious – inevitably making a difficult job for policymakers that much harder.
In Europe, policymakers have failed to counter an expanding sovereign-debt crisis in the eurozone’s periphery, despite many summits and programs, multiple expensive bailouts, and the imposition of painful economic sacrifices on societies. Like an airplane piloted in confusion, the European economy has not behaved according to the instructions. As Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou put it last week in his powerful letter to the head of the Eurogroup, Luxembourg’s Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker, “The markets and rating agencies have not responded as we had all expected.”
With outcomes that fall far short of policymakers’ projections, it is not surprising that there is little harmony in official circles. Narratives increasingly conflict – and in an astonishingly open and unsettling way.
Disagreement in Europe is not limited to that between “solution providers” (the troika of the European Central Bank, the European Union, and the International Monetary Fund) and countries now implementing painful austerity measures (Greece, Ireland, and Portugal). Damaging discord has emerged within the troika itself, with a particularly disruptive impasse between Frankfurt, where the ECB resides, and Berlin, the seat of the German government.
The situation in the US is not as acute as it is in Europe, but policy impotency prevails here, too. Despite unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus, economic growth remains sluggish, and unemployment is stuck at a worrisomely high level. The medium-term fiscal outlook continues to deteriorate while, in the short term, politicians play with the country’s valuable AAA credit rating by arguing like schoolchildren over how to extend the debt ceiling.
Then there are the complex technical difficulties facing policymakers, to which US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke referred in his refreshingly candid manner, acknowledging that “We don’t have a precise read.”
The Fed’s economic manuals, including technical models and historical analyses, shed insufficient light on today’s economic situation. Little wonder, then, that the latest release of the closely followed minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting points to a divided body, whose members anticipate divergent paths for monetary policy, with some expecting further accommodation and others expecting a round of tightening.
Meanwhile, Japan continues to languish. Four months after a major earthquake, a devastating tsunami, and the start of persistent nuclear uncertainties, a comprehensive reconstruction program has yet to be launched. The resulting economic uncertainties are compounding years of inadequate growth and deteriorating public-debt dynamics.
Six important issues speak to the problem for policymakers in Europe, the US, and Japan. First, all three economic areas are struggling with unsettling de-leveraging dynamics. Like oxygen being sucked out of our metaphorical airplane in midflight, deleveraging destabilizes societies and undermines the traditional effectiveness of official policies. Indeed, left completely to their own dynamics, these economies would probably shed excessive debt and alter long-standing social contracts in a manner that is both highly disorderly and that leads to economic contraction and a higher risk of another financial crisis.
Second, domestic de-leveraging dynamics are aggravating other structural impediments. While the specifics vary by economic region and sector (housing, labor markets, credit intermediation, etc.), it is a combination with a common and unfortunate outcome: it inhibits economies’ ability to grow, and thus to overcome debt overhangs in an orderly way.
Third, policymakers are operating in a global economy that is in the midst of major re-alignments, as several systemically important emerging economies, led by China, continue to plow through their developmental breakout phase.
Fourth, in choosing cyclical measures to deal with structural problems, policymakers have complicated matters even more – a reflection, again, of their inability to understand the unusual challenges that they face.
Fifth, politics is complicating matters significantly. The reason is simple: in most cases, the required structural measures involve immediate pain for longer-term gain – a tradeoff that politicians abhor, especially when they are subject to short election cycles.
Finally, communication has been dreadful. Rarely have I witnessed such failure by policymakers to provide a clear vision of their medium-term economic vision – a failure that has added to the general and unsettling sense of uncertainty.
All of this speaks to why we should pity today’s policymakers, who must confront unusually difficult challenges with abnormally ineffective tools. But pity is not a free pass: we should also urge policymakers to shift from their traditional cyclical mindset to one that can better comprehend, and effectively address, the more complicated, yet critically important, structural issues that underlie today’s malaise.
Unfortunately, this will not happen overnight; and, in some cases, conditions might have to become a lot worse in order to focus policymakers’ minds. In the meantime, companies and households lucky enough to be in a position to build precautionary cushions will inevitably continue to do so. Others, unfortunately, will be vulnerable to even greater stomach-churning turbulence – without the perceived benefit of a closed cockpit door.
The views expressed in this article are solely those of Mohamed El-Erian. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011.
regarding the current political imbroglio: The well known Franciscan priest, Fr. Richard Rohr, commented when asked if he knew people that he considered evil. He responded "Yes... I have noticed that evil people are always so darned certain that they are right." I agree with that comment. It also explains a lot of the political grid lock and intransigence that we see in America today.
WTT: Bring if if U think u can handle the True Source of the FLAMe . We got da Guns in dis Town . roll on . . .
A TraNslitER8Shun4:2:1:0: [_asvOLD_ASV_]
"Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called _to_be_ an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, which he promised afore through his prophets in the holy scriptures, concerning his Son, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh, who was declared _to_be_ the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead; _even_ Jesus Christ our Lord, through whom we recieved grace and apostleship, unto obedience of faith among all the nations, for his name's sake; among whom are ye also, called _to_be_ Jesus Christ's: to all that are in Rome, beloved of God, called _to_be_ saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ."
The author seemed to be a trusting person, relying on the pilots to fly the plane out of turbulences. He also thought that policymakers were to blame universally for the financial crisis.
"Like an airplane piloted in confusion, the European economy has not behaved according to the instructions." What a weird analogy! Had he a pilotless plane in mind? Did he think the European economy was left to its devices?
Now watch as Greece sinks into one of the greatest depressions in it's history. When one cuts government spending, that eliminates jobs and without these jobs, people will lose their buying power and that in turn will reduce demand and jobs as well.
Greece had had five sovereign defaults in the past. The last one was in 1932. The American philosopher George Santayana said: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
The author stated, "structural measures involve immediate pain for longer-term gain – a tradeoff that politicians abhor, especially when they are subject to short election cycles". True. Spending cuts are painful but would do good to the country's recovery. Yet Obama is really in a dilemma, It would be irresponsible to leave the jobless and the needy to their devices.
Isn't Greece already in a depression? I'm not sure what policymakers are doing in other nations; in the USA it seems the Republicans & the TeaParty have 1 agenda: to turn America into the "Christian nation" they claim it 1'ce was.I have heard The GOP stands for Gods Own Party! This from the people who recently claimed that black people would be better "taken care of" as slaves! Have they lost their collective, monolithic mind?!? I mean, how can you hope to get any logical discussion going! I don't have much hope for this situation, I will simply do the best I can with the fallout!!
The American public does not evaluate our politicians fairly. We expect balanced budgets, but we don't want our taxes raised, especially not on us (it's almost ok if it's someone else). Instead we say "cut waste," but there isn't enough waste to cut (or people disagree on what is "waste"). We want them to cut government spending, just not where we live or any programs that will affect us.
We want a consistently strong economy and hold our politicians responsible for any falter, even though economic problems develop over time and do not have instantaneous fixes.
Now, compromise is seen as being weak rather than reasonable. With such a bad method of assessment, no wonder politicians spend their time playing politics. If we were more reasonable about our expectations of our government, maybe they would spend their time fulfilling and surpassing those expectations rather than shifting blame for not accomplishing the public's impossible desires.
Perhaps what is shocking is that some politicians still risk their careers to come together and work on legislation to maintain and improve our country.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,855 other followers