What will the world look like in 2025?
August 15th, 2011
03:59 PM ET

What will the world look like in 2025?

Princeton professor Anne-Marie Slaughter (who was most recently on GPS last month) lays out a vision of a brighter world in 2025, but warns that it may take cataclysm to get there. Below are some highlights of her piece, which is well worth reading in full on ForeignPolicy.com.

In 2025, Slaughter envisions:

1. A much more multilateral world.

"By 2025 the U.N. Security Council will have expanded from the present 15 members to between 25 and 30 and will include, either as de jure or de facto permanent members, Brazil, India, Japan, South Africa, either Egypt or Nigeria and either Indonesia or Turkey."

She also envisions more and stronger regional organizations from the African Union and Association of Southeast Asian Nations to a new Middle East free trade region. "Each will follow its own version of economic and political integration, inspired by the European Union, and many will include representation from smaller sub-regional organizations."

2. Sustainability becoming key to national strength.

"As for individual countries, the states that will be the strongest in 2025 will be those that have figured out how to do more with less.They will be those governments that have successfully embraced radical sustainability - maintaining vibrant economies through largely renewable energy and creative reuse of just about everything."

3. Non-state actors of all kinds organizing globally around key issues.

"The American social revolution that Alexis de Tocqueville observed in the early 19th century, of citizens joining groups of every conceivable kind, is about to go global, forever changing the relationship between citizens and their governments, and governments with each other."

But the path to this world is not an easy one, Anne-Marie Slaughter warns:

"These predictions may appear rosy. In fact, the enormous changes on the horizon will require major crises, even cataclysm, before they can materialize. It took World War I to generate the political will and circumstances necessary to create the League of Nations....Just imagine what it will take to break the decades-old logjam of Security Council reform. And creating and changing multilateral organizations is child's play next to the profound changes in public and private behavior required to move away from the more-is-better economic model to one which accepts that our resources are finite on a planetary scale."

Climate change, a global pandemic or a nuclear terrorist attack could force such systemic changes, Slaughter writes:

"As Robert Wright argues in Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny, catastrophe is terrible for individual human beings but beneficial for humanity as a whole. As the full consequences of genuinely global interconnectedness continue to make themselves felt, the world of both states and the societies they represent will have no choice but to adapt."

What do you think of this vision of the world's future? Do you agree or disagree? Be sure to check out the article here and let us know your thoughts below.

Next entry »
soundoff (251 Responses)
  1. Eric

    America represents approx 5% of the world's population yet consumes 25% of it's resources. This will have to change if we are to avoid the apocalyptic view of the future

    August 23, 2011 at 8:19 pm | Reply
  2. Aaron L.

    I think that it will be a safer world if we're all connected with each other in some way. So many organizations are held unaccountable for their actions. This would be a step in the right direction. Then maybe we can allocate more resources to colonize our solar system and make money.

    August 26, 2011 at 10:56 am | Reply
  3. Scott J.

    We have no reason to believe these predictions. They are part of the Globalist Stategy that has been causing much of the financial and social turmoil that has manifested. Since this is a strategy that does not amend itself as it moves along, then it is in fact a failed theory that can only be accomplished by FORCING "it's" wishes and desires on a global population.

    The idea that somehow technology will save us all after some catastrophy, is really poor hopefulness as it is clear that technology has been limited to many "toy" arena type projects and that majority of "technological" things have a large failure rate. Summation: "technology" isn't all it is cracked up to be. In the "technotronic age" it can all be negated at the flip of a switch by emitting a frequency, or even ultra intense solar activity can knock it out.

    So the ideas of a mix-match global society transcending all the barriers, based on simply communications sounds sort of "iffy" when the assumption is that "people" will suddenly change their relationship towards "governments" and governments toward each other. It sounds more like a designated plan rather than some "natural" development.

    You guys have all heard this before. You need to look closer! So we will replace all of these important relationships with what?

    August 31, 2011 at 10:42 pm | Reply
  4. Rob

    I predict that by 2025 we'll have professors that can remember that the League of Nations was a failure that led to WWII.

    September 11, 2011 at 1:44 pm | Reply
  5. Julio99

    I may just off myself before then. I wish I'd been born 20 years earlier.

    September 11, 2011 at 2:54 pm | Reply
  6. Hue Nowlin

    This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your website especially its discussion. From the tons of opinions on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the very good work.

    November 16, 2011 at 6:08 am | Reply
  7. Kimberli Rempe

    Greetings, Lady Allison. Thank you for your kind words. You also have moved me to ponder and act, helping me better organize my business. I am truly appreciative.

    December 7, 2011 at 3:50 am | Reply
  8. Jorn

    Posted on If you still aren't sold on Dance, it's about The Super Young Team from Final Crisis, which has the following rotesr:Most Excellent SuperbatBig Atomic Lantern BoyWell Spoken Sonic Lightning FlashShiny Happy AquazonShy Crazy Lolita CanaryThat is all.

    August 10, 2012 at 1:48 am | Reply
1 2 3 4 5

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Next entry »