Somalia: A very man-made disaster
An emaciated child is among the displaced Somalis at the Dadaab refugee complex last month in eastern Kenya.
August 18th, 2011
11:05 AM ET

Somalia: A very man-made disaster

By Alex Perry, TIME

The difference between a drought and a famine is down to man. Texas is in the middle of its worst drought on record right now but cowboys aren't starving – because Texas, and the US, have government and economy enough to ensure they don't. Somalia doesn't have any government worthy of the name and that's one reason why persistent drought has pushed around 3 million Somalis in the south of the country close to starvation.

The difference between ungoverned Somalia and its better-governed neighbors, Ethiopia and Kenya, is starkly visible on a map: on one side of the border, famine; on the other hunger, and a refugee crisis, but no mass starvation. As Nancy Lindborg, co-ordinating the U.S. response to the famine, says: "If you ever needed a strong case for the need for democratic inclusive government..."

But Somalia's famine is also about the lack of something else: a decent aid operation. There are three reasons the emergency effort to save starving Somalis is falling tragically short.

First, the UN was late calling it. The Famine Early Warnings Systems Network first warned of a hunger crisis last September, and that in a situation the UN has already labelled the worst humanitarian situation on earth for years. But it wasn't until July 20 that the UN began an appeal, and called a famine. Given debt crises in Europe and the US, it is hardly surprising the UN found it could not instantly raise the $2.48 bln it said it needed. Funding today has reached just 55% of that total, "dangerously inadequate" said British International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell yesterday after visiting Mogadishu for a few hours.

Second, Western aid agencies aren't reaching many of the starving. Some, incredibly, are pretending they are. Oxfam is one agency raising money for Somalia and claiming to be reaching hundreds of thousands when, as a spokesman admitted to TIME, it doesn't actually distribute food and has no staff in the famine area. Less disingenuous agencies will admit the emergency operation is not going well. The UN says a mere 20% of the 2.8 million southern Somalis in need are being reached.

The World Food Program, the big player in global famine relief, is reaching even less than that proportion among the 500,000 refugees in Mogadishu, largely because of security concerns. Nearly all Western aid workers stay on a sand-bagged, razor-wired base on the beach attached to Mogadishu airport that, sealed off from the city and patrolled by armed guards, is effectively hardly part of Somalia at all. Rarely do they venture out. WFP does send out 85,000 pre-cooked hot meals every day for distribution through local charities. But stopping mass starvation requires mass food delivery and no one has attempted that since the WFP's one attempt at bulk distribution in early August ended in a riot and seven deaths. Three weeks after the UN declared a famine, refugees I talked to in a camp just 200 meters from the airport had yet to be fed.

Third, southern Somalia is loosely controled by an al Qaeda-allied guerrilla group, al Shabab. The U.S. listed al Shabab as an international terrorist group in 2008, a designation fully justified by its killing of 76 civilians in twin suicide bombings in Kampala, Uganda, in July 2010. Delivering food aid is a dirty business, rife with pilfering, and like governments and aid contractors, al Shabab used to steal a proportion of the food that was delivered to its areas, either to eat itself or sell in the market. But with al Shabab's listing, US aid officials and any aid worker handling US food suddenly had a legal obligation to ensure none of benefitted al Shabab, even inadvertently. The way they dealt with that was to suspend most aid to southern Somalia by the end of 2009. Al Shabab then added its own block by banning WFP, which it accused of being a U.S. puppet, from its territory in January 2010.

Read more at TIME's Global Spin blog.

Post by:
Topics: Aid • Famine • Somalia

soundoff (10 Responses)
  1. Solution Maker

    It's a no-win situation for the innocent children born into famine and food hijacking. Most Americans would consider adopting the innocent babies before allowing them to starve to death. I really have little sympathy for Muslim adults who breed like rabbits and expect the rest of the world to feed them. Perhaps the United Nations can mandate the use of Jadelle Norplant for African women of child-bearing age. This would give 3-5 years of recovery from drought and prevent more mouths to feed in Ethiopia and the Horn of Africa. Many Americans like myself are exasperated over world population levels reaching 7 billion by next year and a projected 9.3 billion by 2050. There needs to be humane answers and solutions for everyone to co-exist on a sustainable, plenty of food & clean water for all on planet Earth.

    August 19, 2011 at 1:36 am | Reply
    • falcon

      Go jump in a hole, you racist, Nazi swine.

      August 19, 2011 at 4:20 am | Reply
      • Solution Maker

        What is your solution? You don't have one do you. Keep feeding a hopeless situation. How about a mandatory 2-child law agreement for every adult on the planet? Does that seem like a fair solution? China already has a 1 child limit. Countries with populations nearing one billion are CAUSING OVERPOPULATION.

        August 19, 2011 at 1:17 pm |
    • jay shelley

      Moga = African verb "to polish or shine"
      Dishu = African "the shoes"
      Therefore the translation of Mogadishu is,"To shine de shoes." Great job for Africans.

      August 23, 2011 at 2:03 am | Reply
  2. j. von hettlingen

    The human factor is secondary. The Somalis have to deal with an inhospitable nature – the aridity and heat make the terrain unfavourable for agriculture.

    August 19, 2011 at 3:29 am | Reply
    • leeintulsa

      Not to mention the deforestation and overgrazing by the somali people.. And leasing away what good land is left to foreign interests.

      August 19, 2011 at 11:37 am | Reply
    • jay shelley

      Moga = African verb "to polish or shine"
      Dishu = African "the shoes"
      Therefore the translation of Mogadishu is,"To shine de shoes."

      August 23, 2011 at 2:04 am | Reply
  3. jay shelley

    Moga = African verb "to polish or shine"
    Dishu = African "the shoes"
    Therefore the translation of Mogadishu is,"To shine de shoes." Good job for Africans.

    August 23, 2011 at 2:02 am | Reply
  4. Oscar

    You have several valid points, Alex Perry.

    But I really really really hope that almost on the day 5 years ago, you wrote an article called "New Orleans: A very man-made disaster"

    August 30, 2011 at 7:23 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.