Rabbani killing shows Taliban not interested in talks
September 20th, 2011
10:11 PM ET

Rabbani killing shows Taliban not interested in talks

Michael E. O'Hanlon

Editor's Note: Michael O’Hanlon specializes in national security and defense policy and is senior author of the IraqAfghanistan, and Pakistan Index projects. You can read more from him on the Global Public Square.

By Michael O'Hanlon – Special to CNN

The killing on Tuesday of the head of Afghanistan’s High Peace Council and former President Rabbani is sad news. The country has had too much killing; the wave of assassinations is dispiriting to Afghan leaders; even if the Taliban has not had the big successes overall than some seem to believe it has, the psychological effects of such dramatic violence are pernicious throughout the citizenry.

But it is important not to overreact. The peace talks with the Taliban were not progressing to begin with. It is doubtful that high-level Taliban leadership has had any real interest in them all along. It is not clear even Pakistan has had much interest. If there is a silver lining here, perhaps fewer people will have unrealistic hopes about the near-term prospects of high-level reconciliation. Smaller steps towards reintegration at the local level may show some promise, but a big breakthrough with Mullah Omar and his inner circle was very unlikely at any point.

Trying to have talks with the Taliban is fine as long as we do not let down our guard in the process. In the very literal sense, it appears that some of Mr. Rabbani’s associates did let down their guard, trying to build trust by not asking Rabbani’s assassin to undergo a security check. It’s easy to say now and it’s not appropriate to overstate, but a bit more vigilance is probably needed. That is a metaphor for the peace talks in general. We must not stop doing things on the battlefield, or stop helping the normal development of Afghan political institutions or Afghanistan’s economy, out of some hope that a Hail Mary at the peace talks will salvage the situation.

Afghanistan will likely turn out ok—not great, but ok—provided we stay focused on the day-to-day and month-to-month slog. And that slog is really not affected, or obstructed, by this recent tragic news.

Post by:
Topics: Afghanistan

soundoff (8 Responses)
  1. Ted Wilson

    This is really sad news. Sounds very reminiscent of Shah Massoud's assasination by al Qaeda two days before nine eleven. The Taliban or some Taliban elements are surely behind this. The Afghan people deserve better, but will they ever get it? Hate to even suggest it but I hope nothing happens in two days...

    September 20, 2011 at 10:32 pm | Reply
  2. j. von hettlingen

    Is this site defect? I can't post my comment!

    September 21, 2011 at 5:46 am | Reply
  3. j. von hettlingen

    Rabbani was naive to believe that Mullah Omar of the Quetta Shura would like to deal with him!

    September 21, 2011 at 5:50 am | Reply
    • j. von hettlingen

      Probably it's the Haqqani network behind his assassination, as Rabbani was appointed by Karzai!

      September 21, 2011 at 5:52 am | Reply
  4. amarcnn

    J. von hettlingen, did you ultimately get your comment through? Sometimes the automated filters mess up. Always love to read what you have to write! Amar (Managing Editor of CNN.com/GPS)

    September 21, 2011 at 2:00 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.