Editor's Note: Dr. James M. Lindsay is a Senior Vice President at the Council on Foreign Relations and co-author of America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy. Visit his blog here and follow him on Twitter.
By James M. Lindsay, CFR.org
Last week’s Republican presidential debate had an online video question from a voter asking why “we send billions of dollars overseas to people who hate us.” It’s not only average Americans who are asking the question. As my colleague Ed Husain points out in his new blog, “The Arab Street,” Idaho Republican senator James Risch struck the same note: “Frankly, I’m getting tired of it, and I think Americans are getting tired of it as far as shoveling money in there at people who just flat don’t like us.”
Here’s a chart listing the ten biggest recipients of U.S. aid in 2010 along with how favorably the publics in those countries view the United States.
It’s a mixed bag. The publics in three countries (Israel, Kenya, and Nigeria) like us; the publics in two countries (Afghanistan and Mexico) are ambivalent; the publics in three countries (Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan) are hostile; and we don’t have reliable data on the publics in two countries (Haiti and Iraq).
Should the United States slash aid to countries that don’t like us? No, or at least not because we think they should show more gratitude. Washington doles out aid primarily based on calculations about how to advance U.S. strategic interests rather than assessments of pure need, which is why Afghanistan, Israel, and Pakistan top the list of aid recipients rather than Burundi, Congo, and Mali. Nor are foreign publics necessarily being ingrates when they don’t hold favorable views of the United States. They may dislike other aspects of U.S. foreign policy, see the aid propping up an unpopular government or lining the pockets of corrupt elites (common complaints among Americans as well), or not even know that their country receives U.S. aid.
With respect to this last point, CFR ran a project a few years back that did focus groups with Egyptians, Moroccans, and Indonesians. One of the findings was that in all three countries people vastly underestimated how much aid the U.S. government gave their countries and did not know what it was spent on. As they learned more about U.S. aid programs, they looked upon the United States more favorably. Unfortunately, there are practical obstacles to advertising U.S. aid to local publics. They will see “From the American People” on sacks of food during a famine. They won’t see “From the American People” on a plaque on a new turbine at a power plant. Worse yet, in some countries stamping “From the American People” on a building or new bus would increase the chances of it being targeted in a terrorist attack.
But the overall lesson is clear: if you are giving aid solely to be liked, be prepared for disappointment.
The views expressed in this article are solely those of James Lindsay.
For what are small percentages of our economy, it is a good gamble that some influential people in the countries can be convinced that we are the good guys. Having a few people in each country not hate us is better than having 100% hate us. Of course we can always take Randy Newman's advice in his song "Political Science" which although almost forty years old is still relevant.
There are two problems with your question:
1) At this point in time the question should be "Should we borrow money from China and hand it out to foreign countries"?
2) There is no correlation between US handouts and public opinion because the money is usually used to bribe foreign leaders that can then be used for contradictory political agendas. The money is never given to the citizens of those countries and I don't see why it should be tied to their favorability rating!
NO! THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT BE GIVING AWAY MONEY TO OTHER COUNTRIES WHEN THEY CAN'T EVEN HELP THEIR OWN KIND, HERE, IN THE U.S.!
DON'T BE STUPID ...
how about keeping the american tax funded aid here at home for a change !
In Russia, this situation is going to Chechnya and Dagestan, they hate Russian, but at the same time in these republics are sent huge funds that they lost as a black hole and never returns from these funds will not be
We should not give money to any country period. I am a big supporter of Israel and I still do not see any reason to give them money. They are doing fine by themselves. But especially the countries that hate us, the hell with them...
STOP STEALING MY FAMILY'S MONEY AND GIVEI'N IT TO THOSE LOSERS!!! PLEASE, LETS VOTE ON THIS ONE.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,856 other followers