October 3rd, 2011
02:00 PM ET

A gender divided

Editor's Note: Naomi Wolf is a political activist and social critic whose most recent book is Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries. For more from Wolf, visit Project Syndicate or follow it on Facebook and Twitter.

By Naomi Wolf, Project Syndicate

The top and the bottom of the list of countries in Newsweek’s recent cover story, “The 2011 Global Women’s Progress Report,” evoke images of two different worlds.

At the top of the list – the “Best Places to be a Woman” – we see the usual suspects: Iceland and the Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Canada. On that planet, we see rankings in the upper 90’s for the survey’s five categories: justice, health, education, economics, and politics. Women are out-earning men in college degrees (United States), domestic abusers are being banned from their homes and tracked with electronic monitors (Turkey), and female prime ministers are being elected (Denmark and Australia).

Now look at the other planet, “The Worst Places in the World to be a Woman.” In Chad, the worst of the worst, woman have “almost no legal rights,” and girls as young as ten are legally married off, which is also true in Niger, the seventh worst place for a woman. Most women in Mali – the fifth worst – have been traumatized by female genital mutilation. In Democratic Republic of Congo, 1,100 women are raped every day. In Yemen, you are free to beat your wife whenever you like.

Though it is stunning to see these two worlds in such stark and detailed relief, their existence is not news: development specialists and human rights groups have been calling attention to these inequities for years. But the systemic oppression of women tends to be cast in terms of claims for empathy: we shouldn’t follow these policies because they are not nice, not enlightened. Some development researchers have started to make a compelling case, too, that oppression of women impedes countries’ efforts to escape poverty.

But the data in the Newsweek list show that we need to frame this issue in stronger, more sweeping terms: When poor countries choose to oppress their own women, they are to some extent choosing their own continued poverty. Female oppression is a moral issue; but it also must be seen as a choice that countries make for short-term “cultural” comfort, at the expense of long-term economic and social progress.

It is not politically correct to attribute any share of very poor countries’ suffering to their own decisions. But it is condescending to refuse to hold many of them partly responsible for their own plight. Obviously, the legacy of colonialism – widespread hunger, illiteracy, lack of property or legal recourse, and vulnerability to state violence – is a major factor in their current poverty. But how can we blame that legacy while turning a blind eye to a kind of colonialism against women in these same countries’ private homes and public institutions?

When the poorest countries – most of them in Africa or with Muslim majorities – choose to sustain and even devise new policies that oppress women, we have to be willing to say that, in some measure, they are choosing the economic misfortune that follows. The developed world’s silence suggests that it takes the mistreatment of black and brown women by black and brown men for granted, rather than holding all people to one standard of justice.

The “surprises” on the Newsweek list confirm that educating women boosts economic prosperity. Many countries with histories of colonialism and other forms of tyranny, as well as countries without abundant natural resources, have chosen to educate women and grant them legal rights. Some continue to struggle economically, but none is abjectly poor – and some are booming. Think of China, India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Brazil, South Korea, and Turkey.

The low status of women on Planet Worst cannot be blamed on cultural stasis: many of the “surprise” countries – Romania, Portugal, the Philippines, and India – treated women far more unequally a mere 50-100 years ago. In Pakistan, marital rape is not illegal today, and there are 800 honor killings a year. What kind of economic boom might stagnating Pakistan enjoy if patriarchy relaxed its grip?

If you are not innumerate, you can start a business. If you are not living in mortal fear of rape and beatings at home, you can organize your community to dig a new well. If you are not subjecting your daughter to traumatic genital injury at three and marrying her off at ten, she can go to school. And, when she does marry and has children of her own, they will benefit from two educated, employed parents, which means twice as much literate conversation in the home, twice the contacts, and twice the encouragement to succeed. Educated, pushy mothers make all the difference.

As US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put it in the Newsweek issue, “The world needs to think more strategically and creatively about tapping into women’s potential for growth. Studies show that helping women access trade and grow businesses helps create jobs and boost incomes.”

But on Planet Worst, forcing terrified, uneducated women to remain at home is more socially acceptable than facing the fact that this means choosing to drag down incomes for everyone. It is time to stop tiptoeing around the poorest countries’ responsibility to do something essential about their own plight: emancipate their women.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of Naomi Wolf. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011.


Post by:
Topics: Women

soundoff (6 Responses)
  1. проектирование металлоконструкций

    Я завжди розслідування онлайн для порад, які можуть принести користь мені. Спасибі!

    October 3, 2011 at 2:28 pm | Reply
  2. Name*Margarita Bello Damián

    http://margaritabeldam.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/el-mejor-pais-para-las-mujeres/

    This My own link about the same theme I have written for a local newspaper in Mexico. The study of Newsweek was really interesting and I thought It worths to write about it. Congrats for yours!!!

    October 3, 2011 at 5:18 pm | Reply
  3. fernace

    It's difficult to formulate a lesson that will have impact with men in these nations! Much of the problem is that the men are also under or uneducated, in the grips of religious zealotry & entrenched in a culture that hasn't changed much in several thousand years! While an uprising of educated women will work wonders, the men need an education too, to understand that societies thrive when men & women work as helpmates & that is something to strive for!I'm proud to see both my birth & adopted nations, Sweden & USA, in the top category! It's really the women of nations like these that must lead the way for our less fortunate Planet Siblings! I for 1 want to learn how to get involved!!

    October 4, 2011 at 1:30 am | Reply
  4. j. von hettlingen

    In some countries the custom of child brides is still practised. In these countries they also see the explosive growth of population. Indeed, women have an important role to play in deciding what they want to do with their lives, which ultimately will have an impact on demography.

    October 4, 2011 at 8:46 am | Reply
  5. Rain4sahara

    I have worked in an NGO in niger for 10 years. I don't argue that the country is not a bad place for women. However, there are many factors that go into this analysis. Readers tend to assume, for example, that the women innigermust be very oppressed GUIs am - not so. Niger is a very secular country with few radicals. It does fail in health care, food security, access to education. These things affect the men, too. Customs that support child brides must be addressed more vigorously. I just want to say a word for poor Niger where hardship is the order of the day; yet it's people remain peaceful and welcoming.

    October 7, 2011 at 1:12 am | Reply
  6. Mail order brides usa

    Many men would love to discover a latin bride-to-be. The problem is many sites are so high-priced. Discover ways to find your current bride pertaining to for free !Mail order brides prices

    January 26, 2012 at 1:54 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,690 other followers