October 21st, 2011
01:29 PM ET

Zakaria: Libya won't descend into chaos

Here's an edited transcript of my discussion with Erin Burnett about Libya's future:

Q: It is unclear whether Moammar Gadhafi’s son, the person who was expected to be his heir apparent, Saif al-Islam is alive or dead.  If he is alive, how does that change the arithmetic in Libya about who could be leading there?

Zakaria: I don’t think it changes the actual arithmetic of the ground. Saif was a creature of Moammar Gadhafi. This was a one-man regime – a one-man cult.  Saif did not have the background or the support in the country – the support among the armed forces or intelligence services – to have ever run Libya, let alone in the circumstance it is in now.

But if he is still alive, it does add an air of uncertainty to the fate of Libya. One of the things that has been very difficult in Libya is the sense of uncertainty – the sense that they haven’t actually finished the revolution, that there was still a great deal of uncertainty. That uncertainty has made Libya harder for business in terms of oil and other things as well.

Q: What do we really know about the new leaders? We have all seen the report from Amnesty International that the transitional government has tortured prisoners. There is a history of tribal splits. There are reports that Al Qaeda affiliates are is in the leadership in Libya. What do you know for sure about the new leaders?

Zakaria: What we know for sure is that they don’t control much of Libya. A lot of reports are really about groups of militias or soldiers that have done bad things. It’s not clear they were directed centrally by the National Transitional Council. Many of the people on the Council are educated, pro-Western people – some of them were within the Gadhafi regime but left because they wanted a better future for Libya. Many of them are deeply frustrated that they have very little control.

Just a day before the news of Gadhafi's death, Mahmoud Jibril, the head of the Interim Government in Libya, said to Time Magazine that he was going to resign. He said he was going to resign because there was a sense of chaos and lawlessness in Libya and that he just didn’t have the tools – a big army – to stabilize the country and then govern it. I think what you’re seeing is a kind of free-for-all. Some of the groups on the ground are doing very nasty stuff.

Q: Given that, is America able to disengage at this point? NATO is saying its mission is done. Is America’s mission not done?

The Obama Administration has been very disciplined about not getting over-involved in Libya. They’ve drawn a clear line to say, “We don’t own Libya.” Colin Powell said before the Iraq War, “If you break it you buy it.” Well, we didn’t break it. So it’s possible for the Obama Administration to continue the way it has with some support and engagement – but nothing that requires major numbers of American troops on the ground or anything like that. The Obama Administration will be able to stay somewhat at arms length. That of course assumes that Libya doesn’t descend into complete chaos, which at this point does not seem likely.

Q: What does this mean for Syria and Bashar al-Assad? Does this change the balance of power or likely outcome there?

It’s not good news for President Assad because it suggests that in the end of the day these kinds of regimes are vulnerable, fragile and will eventually go. But that could take a long time. The situation in Syria is quite different from Libya. You don’t have the geographic split in Libya between East and West. You don’t have rebels or opposition taking one part of the country and raising an army and being supplied from that place. You also have a great reluctance of the West to get involved militarily, largely because of the sense that it would be very nasty. You wouldn’t have local forces on the grounds you could assist.

So I think the obituaries for Assad are premature. I think he will probably be able to survive this in the short run. In the long run, will he be able to? Probably not.  He runs a brutally repressive regime and has a very narrow base of support. The Allawites are a 10% minority within Syria. But so far within Syria you have not seen the kind of geography or situation that allows the opposition to mobilize that would create some kind of fighting force or center of opposition from which you could launch some kind of regime-toppling event.

Post by:
Topics: Libya

soundoff (12 Responses)
  1. Mike

    The United States part of NATO, the organization that "broke Libya". Libya now has no clear leadership, all the major cities are in complete shambles, no military or police force, and no revenue coming in! But hey, everybody is happy now that "Gaddhafi" is gone so no worries right?! Judging by the Iraqi and Egypt examples of things not falling apart until after the party was over ... perhaps maybe Mr Zakaria, the United States, and NATO should wait for a spell before announcing "Success"?

    October 21, 2011 at 1:56 pm | Reply
  2. Andi Prama

    Jacob Zuma, South Africa President was right, Muammar Gaddafi must step down, because he is killing his own people. As for NATO, it is a "new design" weaponry for America to overthrown a nation or government which, in "Washington's perspective", must be wiped out. Obama did a good job for doing this ruthless, mean and cold blooded. Then Osama bin Laden, now Ghaddafi. I don't like Obama's policy anymore. He runs his foreign policy like mafioso Italiano or Al Capone gangster! I think he learned his gangster's ability from preman in Pasar Senen, Jakarta, Indonesia.

    October 21, 2011 at 2:47 pm | Reply
    • Nadaq7

      These rebels seem worse than Gaddafi as they want a big army and sharia law. It was good that South Africa was the last in the world to recognize the NTC.

      October 26, 2011 at 2:18 am | Reply
  3. TowelHeadsAreMorons

    Yes it will because of ISLAME.

    October 21, 2011 at 4:00 pm | Reply
    • John

      That's exactly what Barack Obama would say here since he has an insatiable vendetta toward the Muslims! I wonder where that came from!

      October 22, 2011 at 2:10 pm | Reply
  4. j. von hettlingen

    Yesterday evening the BBC anchor Peter Dobbie reported – unconfirmed – news that Saif al-Islam was wounded and taken to a hospital. It just turned out to be a rumour.
    Well Gaddafi's demise sent an alarming signal to Assad and Saleh. They still maintain an iron grip on power, yet they might face the reversal of fortune as well.

    October 21, 2011 at 4:11 pm | Reply
  5. Onesmallvoice

    Of course Libya won't descend into chaos where from now on, the C.I.A. along with the notorious British MI-6 will be running thiigs with an iron hand. It appears that more and more, the "Arab Spring" is fast becoming the "Fall of Islam" and the "Winter of NATO domination!!!

    October 21, 2011 at 7:57 pm | Reply
  6. johnny

    Libya is small. Its quite manageable even though it may be chaotic for a start. Various factions are waiting to takeover the reins because of OIL.

    I Hope younger Libyan political refugees and intellectuals who have lived in USA and UK, would return to run their country. Otherwise , we may see another 'warlord' rule Libya with an iron fist. Which is unsurprising and predictable in Africa.

    October 22, 2011 at 11:21 pm | Reply
  7. me

    The UN should depopulate the problem regions of the globe: Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Sudan, etc. There aren't enough forces to police the monsters who inhabit these places so just get rid of all the monsters. Think Lord of the Rings and Gandalf. Lets get rid of the goblins once and for all.

    October 24, 2011 at 3:49 pm | Reply
  8. Occupado

    Mighty big prediction, Fareed. My heart hopes you're correct, but my common sense says otherwise.

    October 27, 2011 at 2:41 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.