Editor's Note: Michael O’Hanlon specializes in national security and defense policy and is senior author of the Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan Index projects. You can read more from him on the Global Public Square.
By Michael O'Hanlon – Special to CNN
This Saturday in Afghanistan, in an event that may not grab huge headlines, the transfer of NATO’s training command will occur, as another American Army officer, Lt. Gen. Bolger, takes over from Lt. Gen. William Caldwell. The McChrystals and Petraeuses of the world generally get most of the press in these sorts of operations, but Caldwell’s contribution has been no less central.
During a two-year tenure in the position, Caldwell dramatically amped up virtually every aspect of the training of Afghan soldiers and policemen. Previously, through no fault of his predecessors but due to a fundamental lack of resources, many soldiers got just a few weeks of training and many policemen got none at all. Recruits left training just as illiterate as when they arrived, typically, and went off to jobs with miserable pay - if the pay got to them at all, as it was often skimmed by Afghan commanders or otherwise misdirected. Equipment was shoddy and barracks were no better. And we wondered why the Afghan security forces were often incompetent, corrupt or both.
Fast forward two years. Not just because of Caldwell, but also because of Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez, who ran the main operational arm of the Afghanistan mission known as the ISAF Joint Command and ensured that Afghan units went through a form of apprenticeship by NATO forces in the field even after completing training, things are remarkably better. Afghan forces are providing fully half of all units in major operations in the country’s troubled south and east. They are fighting so hard that they are taking casualties at several times’ NATO’s rate. They are responsible for the security of Kabul and a few other key areas mostly on their own - and while spectacular attacks do tragically still occur in Kabul, the city on balance is safer than the south of the nation and far safer than Baghdad was during that country’s war. Afghan forces now number 310,000, well on their way to the target of 350,000.
Tens of thousands of Afghan soldiers and police are getting literacy training at a time, improving their proficiency on the job as well as enhancing the pride and prestige associated with the job. After basic training, Afghan soldiers get additional specialized unit training before going off to the field. They now make a livable wage and can often gain access to their salaries through electronic banking systems that Caldwell and company have established. While ethnic imbalances do exist in parts of the force, on balance the country’s recruiting mirrors very well the demographic makeup of the country.
NATO’s training command numbers about 5,000 personnel. Its main base at Camp Eggers in Kabul coordinates activities with the Afghan government and has almost 1,000 of those personnel; the other 4,000 plus are spread at 200 places across the country, including training facilities in 30 of the nation’s 34 provinces, and numerous Afghan government ministries where they mentor their Afghan colleagues.
Caldwell has enjoyed a budget of more than $10 billion a year in recent years to build this force, financed primarily by the United States. But cognizant of long-term cost issues, he has whittled down the sustaining costs of the Afghan force to no more than $4 billion annually (by 2015 or so) through various efficiencies and economies. The international community will be able to afford that bill - far less than the $100 billion a year we’ve been spending to fight much of the war with American troops of late.
The essence of our exit strategy for Afghanistan is to contain the insurgency over the next three years while preparing Afghan forces to continue the fight mostly on their own thereafter. Our original hopes to largely defeat the insurgency on our watch will likely not be realized, but as Paul Wolfowitz and I recently wrote at foreignpolicy.com, we can still realistically aim for the “Colombia standard” of relative success in which Afghan forces can contain and gradually whittle away at the remaining extremists even after 2014 when most NATO forces will have gone home. This is a realistic goal and a viable strategy - and General Caldwell with his multinational team and their Afghan counterparts get a huge share of the credit for putting this goal within reach.
The views expressed in this article are solely those of Michael O'Hanlon.
Very nice site!
Americans are dying in Afghanistan due to the double game by Pakistan :(
He is a great Military Officer and HE KNOWS THAT Pakistan is a terrorist state and now a Failed state that TRAINS TERRORISTS TO ATTACK AFGHANISTAN, INDIA AND NATO TROOPS :(
Pakistan quietly accepts and welcomes Terror in the name of JIHAD on Afghanistan , on India in name of Kashmir...it blinds the Pakistanis society to see that its Army and ISI have used terror as an instrument of STATE POLICY for the last 65 years
Pakistan is at covert proxy war with Afghanistan and India.
US did not come SUO MOTO , Pakisanis, Saudis and other exremist muslims orchestrated SEPT 11,2001
US came in defence, EXTREMIST PAKIStanis AND JIHADIS WHO WERE PART OF AL QAIDA AND TALIBAN are to BLAME
Second , Pakistanis could have avoided this if they handed over BIN LADEN but an ISI GENERAL told TALIBAN not to hand over Bin laden
so face US is JUSTIFIED IN SELF DEFENSE
Pakistan's ISI leadership told Taliban to fight Americans to the teeth and make sure that Taliban rule Afghanistan
When the ISAF leave in 2014, some would miss Afghanistan. It's a country with breath-taking landscapes.
Two former members of the Russian Red Army fought during the 1980's in Afghanistan. When the war was over, they didn't want to return to Ukraine and remained.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,855 other followers