Editor's Note: Geneive Abdo is the director of the Iran program at The Century Foundation. Reza Akbari is the research associate for the project. The views expressed in this article are solely those of Abdo and Akbari.
By Reza Akbari and Geneive Abdo – Special to CNN
Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran, one of the greatest failures of the country’s leadership has been the inability to make a promised transition from a monarchy to republican rule. In fact, since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei began his tenure as Supreme Leader twenty-two years ago, he has centralized power further in his own hands, creating what can be called a clerical monarchy.
Now, Khamenei may be completing the circle and entirely eliminating any notion of a “republic” by turning Iran into a fully blown theocratic and authoritarian state.
Last month, Khamenei made a short statement, which has sparked an intense debate. The 72-year-old Iranian leader hinted at the possibility of dissolving the post of president, one of only two institutions in which the populace has a say.
During a visit to Kermanshah, a western Iranian province, Khamenei announced, “In the country’s current political system, there is a president who is directly elected by the people. This is a good and an effective method. However, if someday in the distant future, it is decided that the parliamentary system is a better way to elect the head of the executive branch, there is nothing wrong with changing the current mechanism.”
So why has the Supreme Leader decided to suggest eliminating the position of the presidency in Iran? What does he have to gain from this dramatic political shift? The most obvious explanation is his determination not to repeat the disputed 2009 election and its aftermath. Elections in Iran historically have offered the population rare opportunities to express their grievances with the regime. The protests in 2009 and 2010, which drew millions of Iranians to the streets, not only seriously threatened Khamenei’s ability to govern, but exposed his unpopularity.
In recent years, beginning with the victorious election in 1997 of Mohammad Khatami to the presidency – an outcome conservatives and hardliners did not expect or want – the regime has faced a dilemma over whether the benefits of elections outweigh the costs. The presidential and parliamentary elections – the two polls in which a sizeable number of the electorate are allowed to participate – provide a façade that the country is somewhat of a republic, even though a body called the Guardian Council vets candidates long before voters ever get to the polls.
But the 2009 election and its aftermath inspired a poplar rebellion unprecedented in Iran’s post-revolutionary history. And now that uprisings have swept the Arab world, it is not surprising that Khamenei is so worried about public reaction to Iran’s scheduled 2013 presidential poll that he prefers to eliminate it entirely.
In addition, electoral seasons in Iran inspire some degree of euphoria within society. It is often a time of lively public debate over politics, women’s limited rights in Iran, the economy and Iran’s place in the world, which generally produces widespread criticism of the regime. Khamenei might believe now that the regime is too weak to withstand such intense public scrutiny.
Should Khamenei eliminate the post of president and instead create a parliamentary system, the power to govern would be even more concentrated in the office of the Supreme Leader and this has been Khamenei’s long-term objective.
In recent years, he has moved to acquire influence over three central branches of government. He effectively controls the judicial branch of the government by personally choosing its head. He maintains control over the legislative branch through the supervisory power given to the Guardian Council. This council consists of 12 jurists who determine the compatibility with the Shari’a (Islamic law) with the laws passed by the Parliament. If the laws do not pass the necessary requirements, the Council refers them back to the Parliament for revision. This effective veto power gives the council the de facto role of a parliamentary upper chamber. Six individuals on this 12-member body are directly elected by the Supreme Leader and the other half by the parliament from the jurists nominated by the head of the judiciary.
Khamenei will further control the legislative branch with the recent approval of the “Parliamentary Supervision over Members of Parliament” bill. On Tuesday, September 27, the Iranian Parliament approved Article 4 of the “Parliamentary Supervision over Members of Parliament” bill, which specifies a method for Parliament to expel certain MPs from the body. Based on one of the provisions in this bill, if the Council of Supervision votes to expel a certain member, he or she is not able to file a legal objection through the judicial system. The bill completely removes the legal immunity of members of the parliament in fulfilling their role as representatives.
This provides Khamenei or his aides with the ability to eliminate any parliamentary member deemed to be a trouble maker. By eliminating the position of the presidency, the Supreme Leader effectively dissolves a semi-independent branch of the government whose head is directly chosen by the people, after the Guardian Council vets the candidates seeking to run in the election.
It appears that discussion about eliminating the position of the president has been underway for a few months. According to Fars News, a semi-official news agency, a powerful deputy in the parliament, Mohammad Dehghan, revealed that the office of the Supreme Leader had assigned a group of legal experts to study the feasibility of a shift in the political structure of the country.
According to Dehghan, “This team has studied tens of articles in the constitution and they have identified some issues.” Dehghan reiterated that this team has been functioning under the supervision of the Office of the Supreme Leader and their findings have been sent to that office. Dehghan is referring to the constitutional articles related to the executive branch of the government.
There are many regime insiders who are worried about the future identity of the Islamic Republic. According to Aftab News, on October 25, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the Head of the Expediency Council, protested the possibility of eliminating the presidency in Iran. He warned that the decision will further restrict the political environment and cautioned that this decision would “be contrary to the Constitution and would weaken the people’s power of choice.”
According to Rafsanjani’s official website, “Republicanism and Islamism are the two unalterable elements of the Islamic Republic,” and changing these pillars will ultimately alter the nature of the regime.
Grand Ayatollah Mousavi Ardabili, an important marja' (source of emulation for Shiite Muslims) who is close to Iran’s opposition movement, also criticized such a possible move. In a meeting with a group of journalists, the Grand Ayatollah said, "Changing the political system and selecting the president [or prime minister] by the parliament will decrease people's participation [in the national affairs of the state].”
Whether or not Khamenei decides to eliminate the presidency, there is little doubt he will continue to consolidate more power in his office. These days, the words of the late Grand Ayatollah Ali Montazeri ring more true than ever. Following the regime’s intense crackdown on political opposition in 2009, Montazeri declared that “The Islamic Republic is neither Islamic nor a Republic.”
The views expressed in this article are solely those of Abdo and Akbari.
© 2012 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| Advertising practices | Advertise with us | About us | Work for us | Help
I have no problem with how Iran is run, as that is not the issue. I have a problem with its lack of good visibility in the "global public spuare". When you interviewed the president of Iran, I got the feeling that you were headed into a secret location, wearing a blindfold. This is not about making enemies either. I live behind someone from Iran. He is the nicest person I have ever met and I always look forward to talking and learning with him. This is about being forthcoming in truth, for the sake of humanity. I am not seeing any solid global progress and the reason for that is clear. The ark belongs in the temple dome, right now as Moses instructed. We can hash out the details, when we have an accord.
Actually, I'm an Iranian and I DO have a problem with how Iran is run. It's a dictatorship of almost the same degree as Kim Jung IL's, with the only exception that Iran isn't as isolated. However, I have absolutely NO problems with its nuclear ambitions and its stance towards the US. Not that I'm anti-american or anti-israeli. I just think the two of them should just sit down for a sec and think about their own actions in the past and in the present instead of pointing fingers at other nations that have existed for over 2500 years. US and Israel are like the global family's teenagers with more muscles than their wiser and older family members terrorizing the house while trying to find out what it is they actually want. The Iranian government is no threat to any nation whatsoever, though it is a venom to its own people that must be taken care of.
Support the Green Movement, support freedom lovers and all who even dare to say the words 'nuke' and 'iran' in the same sentence can go F themselves.
Peace to all.
Very well said Shahin.
Just because a country has been there for over 2,500 years doesn't make it wiser than others.
To suggest an Iranian government that openly provides money and weapons to terrorist groups is not a threat to anyone else is disingenuous at best.
The United States and Israel aren't the only nations to turn their backs on this theocracy. Many other western nations agree with the United States concerning how dangerous nuclear missiles would be in the hands of a theocracy. Iran hasn't been marginalized simply because of the United States and Israel. Iran is a bad player in the eyes of many. This theocracy is their own worst enemy. Even China and Russia are finally coming around to acknowledging that Iran has not been fully forthcoming on their nuclear ambitions. No one would care about their nuclear ambitions if they had not proven time and again that they aren't interested in International law – only the law of Islam.
nuke iran
nuke iran'
Overblown rhetoric about peace and war is what has gotten Iran to the place they are right now. We don't need more of it.
threatening to destroy Israel and arming terrorist groups throughout the world convinces you that Iran is not a threat to anyone but their own people?. You almost seemed like a rational thinker, for a moment. too bad you cant get past the propoganda. maybe you should try
How the h-ell is Iran wiser in any way shape or form. ridiculous.
what? iran is certaInly a threat, based on the words and actions of that ridiculous government you have there. That guy is taking you people to a very dark place at this rate. Supporting terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah just to start is a good enough reason to never trust Iran. how can you justify that?
Shanin, you're dumb. Iran pursues violence against many peoples. Through Hamas, Hezbollah, and others I don't even know about! Trains terrorist on it's soil and provides weapons for many. It seems Iran is trying to obtain nuclear weapons, which will not be allowed by the rest of the World. The Iranian people can't even topple their government. Take up arms if you have to. I'd rather be free than live under a dictatorship (ayatollah).
As a response to all the questions that were asked in the replies to my comment:
1. I never said "Iran is wiser than other countries". I said Iran is a country with a history that covers a timespan of more than 2500 years, by which I meant that young countries such as Israel and the US should show some respect and analyze Iran's (and not just Iran's but any other country in the world) history before coming to rash conclusions and inciting war.
2. To the moronic arguments that include "terrorist funding" and "vowing Israel's destruction": As an Iranian I am very well aware of 2 things. The first is that my farsi is good enough to understand the Iranian leaders to KNOW that they have never literally threatened Israel nor America, nor any other Western country in ANY way. If you think you're Persian is better, then please do enlighten me. The second is the fact that I DO know that Iran funds terrorist organizations but that I also know that the US and Israel do the exact same thing. Assassinating top scientists is by my opinion still an act of agression towards harmless, innocent civilians (see Mossad assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists). And funding sunni terrorist organizations within Iran to destabilize the country is another thing Americans aren't afraid of doing. Much like how the US deals arms with the PKK in Iran (also meant to weaken the regime). You americans like to blame everything on muslims and in this case on Iran, and muslims/Iranians (not all of them though) blame everything on Israel, USA and Europe. But what is the truth? It's everyone's fault. It's just a vicious circle caused by mistakes of different factions of a different age which will never come to an end untill the weakest link is defeated. In this case, the US and Israel are trying to defeat Iran with anything they can: sometimes with facts, sometimes with lies. Iran idem.
3. Just to give an answer to the ad hominem attacks: I am against the Islamic Republic and I wish for Iran to become a free, secular, democratic state with Islam being driven back to the desert it came from. This however does not mean that I have to agree with every argument Western nations throw at Iran, which are very often nothing but argumenta ad absurdum, inciting exclamations and false accusations. there is good in everyone, even in the vilest of people. Even the Islamofascist regime of Iran is capable of saying intelligent things once in a while...
You want to oppose the Iranian regime? Then do so by supporting its people and referring to its history, not by slandering our culture and insulting our heritage.
You are right on Shahin. Most readers only hear the one-sided propaganda against Iran without knowing the history of the West's dealings in Iran over the last 150 years. There is also selective abstraction of news headlines about Iran that are uniformly inflammatory and provocative ("wipe Israel off the face of the earth"; stoning of women; imprisonment of adversaries; death to gays; etc...). After the New York Times repeated the mistranslation of Ahmadinejad's speech as saying "Wiping Israel off the face of the earth," it was repeated over and over again until now it is taken as fact (he actually just said essentially that in time the zionist regime will pass from the pages of time like the soviet regime). The Iranian president NEVER threatened to harm Israel or Israelis. He did put into question the degree of the holocaust (the mind boggles), not the most sensitive thing to say, but he has never said anything anti-semitic or threatening to Israel or Jews. Not defending his leadership, just keeping the record straight. Most do not know the terror the US has supported against Iran (chemical warfare provided to Saddam Hussein in the 80's; CIA overthrow of the government in the 50's; etc...).
Shahin I agreed with everything you said but wanted to correct your timeline. Iran's history is actually at least 9000-10000 years old regarding settled communities. The first urban site at Susa with written history going back to 3000 BC. History of the Persians (one of the Iranian tribes) as a unified empire in Iran dates to 2500 years ago. Anyway, just my 2 cents.
That's a reasonable stance, Shahin.
I just love the way you show your hostility towards anyone who doesn't share your opinion and then wishes all peace. This is sooo the Iran today. There will be no peace until Iran's supreme leader, his cronies and his supporters meet their maker and Iran becomes a true democracy, the true intent of its revolution.
The last wise Persian rulers were Cyrus and Darius. Afterwards, and particularly after its Islamization, Persia/Iran has little to teach the world and its contribution to global welfare has been nil. Adolescents we may be, but our contributions far surpass Iran's and despite the age of its civilzation, Iran's lesson to the world is to serve as a warning to others.
shahin,
I would like you to notice one thing. Your post is still visible, and unaltered. Could the same be said of our posts if this were Iran? Would we have to worry about the secret police coming to take us away?
Just look at the threads on any political story and see the bashing between the republicans and the democrats. Would that be allowed in Iran? Could you go to some street corner in Iran and start shouting that the ayatollah was wrong? How long would you be allowed to?
Hexdragon: I am fully aware of the Human Rights violations in Iran today, don't need to remind me of that. If you actually read my comments you would have seen for yourself that I am against the IR and I DO wish for Iran to become a free, secular democracy. I just stated that just because it is a bad regime, it doesn't mean we have to demonize everything and everyone connected to it. The IR is a backward regime that kills its own people and commits the vilest of crimes, but in this case I believe America is being driven to another pointless war for obviously ambiguous reasons. The IR is NOT a threat to any other country but its own and that is a FACT, no matter how evil those ayatollahs may be.
Iran with nuclear weapons is not acceptable.
The Iranian regime is a menace, they are barbarians.
Check this : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/06/gay-men-hanged_n_951162.html
Barbarian Iranian Regime that STONE WOMEN Must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons.
See: http://www.iran-e-azad.org/stoning/women.html
Nuke Iran.. Than Peace 2 All
You have no problem with a theocratic oligarchy of unelected shamans making decisions for the masses? You should go live there for a while.
Maybe he simply recognizes that it's none of our business. If Iran threatens us or our allies, that's our business. But what form its government takes is neither our problem nor our responsibility. The Iranians have to control their own destiny. It's up to THEM to fight for their own democracy, if they want to. We might not like watching a government crack down on its own people, but national sovereignty is a concept that must be respected.
National sovereignty and national security are often cited when protesters are being murdered in the streets. The protesters are no match for the heavily armed Revolutionary Guards and their minions who will stop at nothing to protect an Islamic theocracy.
It's not a perfect world, Kevin. I don't like watching a government oppress its own people either, but it's not up to us to choose their government for them or overthrow the one that they have.
Then most Iranians have a problem with you.
IRAN, RULED BY AN AYATOLLA (PRIEST) WILL BE JUDGED BY MY GOD JESUS CHRIST: FOR WE WILL ALL BE JUDGED BY MY GOD JESUS CHRIST; FROM THE LEAST TO THE GREATEST OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE EARTH. AMEN
During his visit to Kermanshah not long ago Khamenei "hinted at the possibility of dissolving the post of president",
I can imagine it was just saber rattling. Khamenei has a problem with Ahmadinejad and not with the presidential office per se. I doubt if he would go that far, without sensing the rage of the people. Khamenei was a humble person when he became a Khomeini's protege. He seemed to care what other people thought of him. It seems that he wasn't that visionless after all, as he's trying to lead Iran into a nuclear age.
While remaining in the bronze age of thinking.
Let's just hope that this doesn't happen. Mahmoud Ahmedinejad is a very good man and deserves to be President despite all the ranting done against him in the West. But then again, the U.S., Great Britain and France want to incorporate Iran into their future Central Asian empire. They tried that back in June 1969 but their candidate Malawi or whatever his name is lost the election to Ahmedinejad! Anyway, any Iranian leader can be a great improvement over that terrible Reza Pahlavi(1953-1979) with his torture tactics and devotion to the right-wing thugs in Washington!!!
True, if there's hope for change in Iran, it will be through Ahmadinejad. Despite his populist rhetorics the Machiavellian still has both feet on the ground.
Not really, if Ahmadinejad is not careful Khamenei will usurp whatever leadership position Ahmadinejad thinks he has and will not have his feet firmly on the ground but swinging a short distance above. In all of the mid east, the faux window dressing of secularism floats on the surface of the deeper and ultimate authority of islam, barely keeping it's adherents contained as the world opens up like a big colorful vista of different ways of thinking and views and all oppressed people of all faiths and ideologies will see they do not have to exist under the iron fists of despots and religious dictators and will remove them from power with a vengeance. Maybe someday people will see that religion is a force of suppression in this world, not a moral path to higher enlightenment. Religious leaders rule by fear, instilling the fear of the loss of your soul should you deviate from their teachings all the while enriching themselves from their followers toil. Whoever and whatever the creator is sure miscalculated.
Despite all of Ahmedenijad's rantings about wiping Israel off of the face of the Earth and denying the Holocaust? You really think this is good leadership?
Wow, really? Could you BE any more of a shill? Let me ask you a question: do you like being a tool for repressing the people of Iran? Do you, in fact, have any facts? Taking the name Joe McCarthy? lol what a joke. I am actually American, and was always a bit sceptical about so called shills who try and discredit dissent, it just seemed so dumb to believe anyone follows around peoples comments on the internet and dispute them as you are doing. Now I am convinced. So thank you. It was exceptionally ham-handed of you– idiot.
Obviously you are either clueless or plain ignorant. You think the shah of Iran was using torture tactics, well that is nothing compared to the tactics they are using now! I am so sick of americans like you who don't know what is going on on the other side of the world, can you just please keep your mouth shut, you sound like an idiot. The MAJORITY in iran do not like or accept ahmadinejad. And the president can be an improvement in iran??? Any moron can look at iran's economic and social status pre-and post- 1979. The shah was no good, but this corrupt regime has taken Iran back at least 100 years.
He's not American.
Very interesting but....
Let's see, abuses against his own people, wants to nuke other countries off the planet..... yep that's a good man there and you can keep him.
Mr. Ma Carthy,
You don't know a D... thing about Iran. You mix up the names. 1969 The late Shah was the best ally United States ever had. What does that have with Ahmadinejad and Mousavi? Go get the facts about this totalitarian theocratic so called republic, how many people young and old they executed so far, total number of political prisoners at this time are kept in just Evin prison, then get the facts about the time of The Late Shah (not Reza Shah, Mahammad Reza Shah's father, who did even greater than his son). Just hush when you don't know.
One more thing for you as Ahmadinejad's fan, he was (and is) one of the most brutal executioners Islamic Republic has ever had.
Leviticus
24:4 He shall order the lamps upon the pure candlestick before the LORD continually.
24:5 And thou shalt take fine flour, and bake twelve cakes thereof: two tenth deals shall be in one cake.
The Implimentation of the stress test would make such assumptions!
That must be good weed that you're smoking Tina!
No Doubt
Although I believe their is a supreme being that created everything I do not believe that the supreme that created everything left the book called the Bible or any other records for us to know the supreme being by.I think it is something all must find in themselves to know by common sense what is right from wrong.Nature shows itself,and rules of nature are shown through what occurs`s in nature frequently as natural unless common sense shows an occurrence, like birth defects for example,to not be natural.Do I think Jesus Christ actually lived ? I think so. Do I think Jesus Christ is the son of the supreme being ? I have no way to know, using common sense.
Using common sense. Then no, he was not the son a a sky faerie.
Get rid of both of them; they are a cancer on the nation of Iran.
Quite wrong, Carm! The true cancer on Iran is the relentless expansion of the U.S., Great Britain and France into Central Asia which now poses a threat to Iran itself. Look at what is happening in both Afghanistan and Iraq!!!
Afghanistan was harboring and facilitating Al-Quada. What would you have us do? Send flowers? Saddam Hussein played cat and mouse with international weapons inspectors for over a decade. Whether he had weapons or not, he was intentionally leading the world to believe that he did. I suppose a bouquet was in order for him also.
small voice. Iran's and afghanistan's support of AQ is what brought us to there. Had neither nation supported them, then we would not be there.
Just think. When the GOP regain power, they will start a war with Iran (totally unfunded of course). Then they will draft all the poor people to fight(die) in the war (just like the GOP wants) and give "no bid" contracts to the rich people. Killing two birds with one stone!!! Then we can use Iran's oil to pay for the war. And when the war is over, Iran will sell us cheap oil!!! Just like Iraq........Oh wait........Never mind.
Obviously * they ( * Higher position than the president ), are getting ready to put the current President of Iran in a higher position of power.This will let them control him & quite the Iran people, plus give no way any movement gains any control through any Iran peoples elections in Iran.The only way if done would be if the Revolutionary Guard is taken out.All this means the leadership of Iran will be hiding more behind the Iran Revolutionary Guard Corp`s,meaning the people of Iran or any movement to change Iran in any way whatsoever will then have to take control the IRGC.It`s a safty net for the leadership and a way to totally control all of Iran unless a war changes the power structure.I predict war for sure sometime in the next 8 years.For sure 4 if Obama is not re-elected.
It doesn't matter, one way or the other. A dictatorship is a dictatorship, any way you cut it.
The US needs to wake up to the fact, we are on the verge of being taken into a dictatorship, by the Democratic Party, as well.
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? You mean the paid GOP, paid by the KOCHS? D-valise
Democratic Party is not the problem.Republican party is the problem.I am a registered Republican and even I saw from day one of Obama election to office Republicans holding back ALL ways for Obama to do anything to help the country.The Republican Senator from Kentucky is a huge problem more or less dictating what republicans ALL do.Republican have from day one held back on any real help to the country to try to play a game to make it look like Obama is responsible for their inaction's. Obviously it has worked on you and many others.Obama has tried to pass so many measures only to have republicans turn them away in both the Congress and senate for the blame game they are playing.Did you know Republicans actually tried to put 8 republicans in offices running as Democrats until the problem was caught ? Under rules they could only be disqualified not jailed.Republicans play dirty if not secretly outright illegal I have finally come to see.I will be changing my status to Independent & will never vote for another Republican as long as I live because of what Republicans have done to this country since Obama has taken office.We would be in great shape by now if Republicans had only worked with Obama instead of filibuster his every attempt to create jobs and better the system.Hopefully you will to be able to discover what I have and help throw the real bums out of office which are not the Democrats,but Republicans and Republican moles.
Hope all is well your & everyone`s way :
~ Aacon S
No. Both parties are the problem. Please see google for rootstrikers. We need to stop all of the graf going to BOTH pubs and dems.
U have to be kidding more. Far more of that was seen from 2001-2008.
Really, Joseph McCarthy?
The name you chose is quite fitting. First off all, Iran's leader from 1953 – 1979 was Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi, his father was Reza Pahlavi, who was the founder of modern Iran. Without the Pahlavis, there would be no semblance of modernity in Iran. No railroads, no communication lines, no universities, etc. Iran was a neglected country, essentially an ex-officio colony of the British and Russians until Reza Shah the great came to the scene. In fact, he introduced a resolution when he was Prime Minister to establish a republic in Iran with an elected presidency but ironically the idea was rejected by the mullahs who instead suggested that he become Shah instead.
As an Iranian, I am deeply offended to read your statement that "Ahmadinejad is a good man". did you realize what you were saying when you wrote that? What is your reasoning for such a claim?
I am not claiming that the Shah was perfect, but there have been four different regimes in Iran in the last 100 years: the Qajar dynasty, the Pahlavis, that brief stint with Mossadegh and the Islamic republic. When you compare all these, only one can emerge as the overall best choice for Iranians. under the last Shah, Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi, Iran had a negative unemployment rate, new industries, a strong defense, etc. And Iran was persuing nuclear power technology with the help of other nations, not their chagrin.
Joe, you say the Shah was a "torturer", well if that is true then what does that make Ahmadinejad? Because in the first days of the founding of the Islamic Republic in 1979, more people were executed than in the 37 years that the Shah was in power. One million people were killed in the Iran-Iraq war, many of them children sent into mine fields to clear the way for tanks. When Iran and Iraq went to war under the Shah, it lasted merely days with Iran victorious and without the use of children as sacrificial lambs led to the slaughter. Compared to the current regime in Tehran, the Shah's government was quite humanitarian given the fact that it was still a developing society.
Anyhow, I just can't see your rationale Joe by defending Ahmadinejad and criticising the Shah. That's like defending Hitler by criticizing the Kaisar of Germany. It doesn't make much sense.
@ PrinceOfYazd You speak the truth and know history well. I agree with you completely.
Well said.
PrinceOfYazd
The Iranian people have an amazing resiliency. I hope that the freedom they seek will one day be a reality. Thank you for your words. I have been to the city of Yazd in Iran the people were very friendly and learning about your heritage, history of Zoroastrianism and the legacy of Cyrus The Great was truly inspiring.
Thank you Robert for your words of encouragement about my homeland and about Zoroastrianism. It is such a peaceful and historic faith. I envy you for you have been able to visit Iran and sadly I have never been afforded that opportunity. Someday when things improve there are many of us around the world who will go back to the land we only see in our dreams.
But as an Iranian I really love Ahmadinejad and I believe that he is a hero who will lead Iranians to justice and freedom since you should know that he is not responsible for any of crimes which have been done in clerics' regime and even he has not any power to do so. He is an honorable person for the majority of Iranians.
Saddam Hussien always said these words for 28 year rule " The Military decipline is needed for whole world" but he did'nt use words like Islam to supress his people..unlike khomenie of Iran ,& Saudi King of SA..
There goes every iranian's hope of having any freedom....
Nope. I think it would be the opposite. Once they see that they have very little to lose, then they will rebel.
Looks like Ahmadinejad has been spending the "People's" money on web trolls.
Agreed. Its hilarious how obvious it is. I think "joseph McCarthy" is actually Ahmedinejad. Sad that his platform and support is so weak he has to turn to trolling. lol@Ahmedinejad.
I think the people of Iran will rebel eventually and elect a new government. Perhaps a few years after that, I'll visit.
You can have an Islamic theocracy or you can have a Republic; but you cannot have an Islamic Republic. Its like the formal name of North Korea: the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Everyone knows that North Korea is not Democratic and not a Republic. It is simply amazing that somehow naming a country as an Islamic Republic should matter an iota. Such is the power of language and cleric's fear that calling Iran an Islamic theocracy in the modern world is not acceptable. What a joke on the people of Iran. Do you really believe that the Iran people do not know that they are living in theocracy not in a Republic?
I hope that Khamenei does this. That is the kind of stuff that will finally force the population's hand on this. As it is, they can see that Arab Spring has done a lot for these nations. If Syrians rise up and Assad falls, then it will create incentives for Iranians to rise up against their dictator.
The biggest mistake the US govt has made in the last 20 yrs, was turning against our best ally in the arab world–Saddam Hussein. We should have kept fueling the Iran-Iraq war until both sides would be in ruins. We then could have "placed" leaders in power with favorable tendencies to the US and Western Europe.
The creation of a Crerical Monarchy in Iran will centralize all powers in the Ayatollah, which may be good for the World. There will be less meddling in International affairs, which has been Ahmadinajad's forte! The entire Middleeast needs a shake-up, which we cannot do from the outside. The islamic World will implode, before sanity prevails and they enter the modern world!
I'll only care if the Ayatollah defies his Arab brethren and speaks out in favor of diplomacy with Israel (or at the very least, acknowledging that the Holocaust actually happened). Only then should we be on good terms with them.
This dog is 72...when he is dead things will change is a hurry....civil war on the horizon.
The very name 'Islamic Republic' is an oxymoron! Any state that is 'Islamic' will inevitably drift into Islamofascism, in accordance with the fundamental principles of Islam. History and of course today's poitical landscape demonstrate abundantly that Islam and Democracy are irreconcilable...
Realistically speaking there are only very few Countries in the World which adopt presidential system.
Notably U.S.A.; Russia (basically US-like system minus vice president - eliminated in 1993); Belarus,
Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Georgia (all are setup like Russia); France (the only
presidential republic in western Europe; still powers of president are less than in US);
Ukraine (presidential powers are significantly limited to mainly foreign affairs; internal politic is yielded
to prime minister), and thereafter we are talking about Iran, Siria, Egypt (although it is not clear what it
is now), Pakistan (actually a joke presidency), and handful others.
Dissfunctionality of Ukranian half-Presidential half-Parliamentary system was spectacularly
demonstrated during the last five years culminating with standoff between then Pres. Yushchenko
and prime-minister Timoshenko. Their example is actually a note how a country should NOT be
setup. It is a recipe for permanent crisis.
Dissfunctionality of U.S. presidential system is being demonstrated now when most of
the initiatives of Pres. Obama are being blocked by the opposing parliament. And this is at
the time where the country needs a functional government.
Russia and Kazakstan work only because of strong personalities of Putin and Nazarbayev
respectively. Buck in Yeltsin's times this political system was as dissfunctional as in Ukraine.
Long before that Stalin was technically a prime-minister. One can think anything about him,
but there are two things he was NOT: he was not dissfunctional; and he was not corrupt.
France ... well ... Sarkozi in kind of ... short, and it seems that French are not very happy.
So basically if Iranian Ayatollas look around and gather World experiences, switching from
presidential to parliamentary system does not seem to be a bad idea or an evidence that the
regime is crumbling. I guess, the German current political system in an example of successful
crisis-less form of government.
To all of you Iranians who supported the Islamic revolution; hahahahahahaha.
C'mon people, the only future that Iran wants is to be the alpha dog in the region and then expand their religious crap to the rest of the world and make slaves of everyone that doesn't believe in their BS theocracy and totalitarianism ways.
I say sanitize the country with NUKES ! Nuff said !!!!!!
CNN will not let the truth out
Shame on CNN. I have written to them complaining about blocking reasonable rational comments if they get too close to their many hot buttons. Maybe their are adults further up the chain of comand.
Got it. You are watching and will not post strong arguments against your personal position.
Proved it to you just then.
Iran equals Persia these fellas several thousand years ago tried to kill democracy at its birth place. In Greece let history remind us these Persians/Iranians are and always have been against free thinking people. Slavery was invented by these people. How can we ignore this clear crystal fact. Its hilarious when you think the Presidency could be taken away. Thats how hollow it is the people think they have the right to vote for what a hollow frame with no picture inside.
Hahaha no one could do that here in this country without an actual vote. Let this be a reminder to all those who crap all over this country. You are more free and independent here then you possibly understand and can comperhend.
Those countries in the Middle East should do themselves a favor unite for one common cause. That cause to eliminate Iran from the map. You think they will not attack you because you are a Muslim ha you are more foolish than the world thinks you are. I tell you Iran is working on something big that if you do nothing to stop it now you will have the deaths of thousands. Its nasty to say but the last time Iran went to war with Iraq. 1.3 million Iranians died with 300,000 Iraqies. With of course the more important lose of 1 trillian dollars in all that oil. You don't want that to happen again now do you? I know the death of people have no importance to heartless people. But you have to keep your wallet in mind correct.
"Kill democracy at its birthplace"? Listen mate, if you're gonna act smart, at least do your research, alright?
The Persians wars had NOTHING to do with democracy. In fact there is no archeological evidence whatsoever that suggests that Persians even had slaves. If anything, it was forbidden in the Persian empire to own slaves as decreed by Cyrus the Great himself. The historian Tom Holland even wrote that many Greek slaves (slavery was an official legality in Ancient Greece), which consisted of almost a third of the entire Greek population, welcomed the idea of Persian rule since it would mean freedom to them. Not to mention the way lakedaemonians (aka 'spartans') slaughtered unarmed Helots for fun. The Persian empire was built on the principles of freedom of speech and freedom of religion, how else would Herodotus himself have been allowed to criticise the Persian Empire so openly while living in Persian territory?
Yes Greeks may have set the foundations of present day democracy, but it was in NO way the "birthplace" of democracy, since democracy itself is not a Greek invention, but a very common trait to many primitive and non-primitive societies over the globe. Greeks were the first to give it an actual name and use it as a fixed form of government. Even so, Athenian democracy was far from libertarian since only about 75% of the entire Athenian population was legally allowed to vote. Women, Slaves, non-athenians and minors were not granted any votes. Not to mention the adult athenian males who barely had the chance to travel to town and cast a vote. Of the +- 300 000 Athenian population, about 30 000 were legally allowed to vote, minus the number of people who didn't choose to vote + considering that magnificent Greek habit of blackmail and bribery, this must have been an excellent system!
Anyways, just wanted to say that you should definitely get yourself educated, because the way I see it, you're nothing more but ignorant trailertrash. And you know where you can stick your racist and hate filled remarks.
forget the 75% sentence, my bad.
The idea that Iran would painstakingly and at great expense develop a nuclear program, just so that it could insure its own complete annihilation by lobbing its first few warheads at Israel, is utterly laughable. If they were so foaming-at-the-mouth hot to nuke Jerusalem – a Muslim holy site, by the way – they could undoubtedly have spent some of those millions to BUY the weapons with which to do it. It's like accusing someone of spending years and thousands of dollars to become a master gunsmith in order to make their very own gun – with which to mug their neighbor.
This leaves us looking for other reasons for Iran pursuing its own nuclear capability, such as energy independence and a deterrent against certain unnamed nations that don't know how to mind their own business.
Also, Rob – Iraq was the aggressor in the recent conflict between Iran and Iraq. Look it up.
Rob...I am sorry for you for your ignorance. Just because you have a keyboard and can form somewhat coherrent sentences doesn't give you a license to preach absence of facts.
You are spending too much time at the movie theater watching '300' and not enough time in the library. But I better be careful not to pick on you or you may say that I am taking away your freedom of self...ignorance.
Iran is irrational. . That covers it.
Mr. Ma Carthy,
You don't know a D... thing about Iran. You mix up the names. 1969 The late Shah was the best ally United States ever had. What does that have to do with Ahmadinejad and Mousavi? Go get the facts about this totalitarian theocratic so called republic, how many people young and old they executed so far, total number of political prisoners at this time are kept in just Evin prison, then get the facts about the time of The Late Shah (not Reza Shah, Mahammad Reza Shah's father, who did even greater than his son). Just hush when you don't know.
One more thing for you as Ahmadinejad's fan, he was (and is) one of the most brutal executioners Islamic Republic has ever had.
Iran has has every right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. That is what its declared aim is, while it denies it has any intention to divert it to military use. The western countries led by Israel do not believe that the latter is true because they themselves lie all the time. Attack on Iraq was based on lies. They also want Israel to remain the dominant power in the region so that it can bully them at will and permanently occupy Palestinian land and subjugate the Palestinian people. Besides, there is nothing wrong with Iran developing nuclear weapons to defend itself against the expansionist state of Israel which is suspected to secretly posses upto five hundred nuclear warheads with a range of five thousand miles, potentially giving it the power to destroy the entire world. We must be much more afraid of Israel than Iran. What we see here is prejudice. Also, they say that Iran can not be trusted with nuclear weapons because it is a theocracy. This is a false notion as truly theocratic nations do not lie as a rule. And Iran is a truly theocratic and peace loving nation having not waged war in a thousand years of its history, in contrast to Israel which has repeatedly attacked all of its neighbours several times in its short years of illlegitimate existence.
Actually, it was Israel's neighboring countries that had repeatedly attacked. If those countries had not attacked, they would not have lost territory and there would be no Israeli occupation of those lost territories. The plight of the Palestinian Arabs was caused by the military mistakes of other Arabs in attacking Israel. Jews and Arabs have lived together in the region for thousands of years. Israel is not a new country. Israel existed there since before the Roman Empire. Israel has existed for nearly six thousand years. Far longer than the repressive theocracy in Iran will exist.
Soon the Supreme leader will be getting his directions from God directly. Good chance God wants an updated Coran and the Ayatola is the only Muslim that God favours. You all think I am kidding, maybe I am but these nuts are constantly on the look out for more population control.
More likely he would be getting his orders from Satan. The Supreme Leader in Iran oppresses and murders people. This is forbidden by Muslim law. If there is a God, it's unlikely God would favor a man who ignores the laws that God gave to man. Anyone who reads and understands the holy Koran will understand why the Supreme Leader in Iran is at odds with the teachings of the Prophet. The true faithful or Iran will one day bring down the corrupt theocracy there.
Well, at least Iran doesn't have a nutcase like GWBush that threatened to unleash Armageddon on the world.
Oh, wait.
.
ان الحدث الليبي حدث كارثي بكل المقاييس ، لانه ادى الى دمار المدن بصورة كاملة واودى بحياة عشرات الالاف وهجر الملايين من مدنهم وخلق ثأرات مدمرة بين القبائل الليبية سوف تبقى نيرانها متأججة لعشرات السنين ، والاخطر انه شهد ارتكاب جرائم بشعة باسم الله والدين وكان التكبير باسم الله يتعالى مع كل جريمة وكأن ما قاموا به جزء من الايمان ، ولعل اغتصاب القذافي وادخال قضيب في مؤخرته وهو حي ، والتمثيل بجثته وجثة الكثير ممن اغتيلوا بلا رحمة وهم اسرى حرب ، ونبش القبور وحرق العظام الخاصة بعائلة القذافي ! ان ارتكاب تلك الجرائم وغيرها كثير لم يكن دعاية مضللة بل كانت جرائم موثقة بافلام صورها القتلة انفسهم مفتخرين وسعداء ونشروها في الانترنيت وشاهدها الملايين الذين فجعوا بوحشية من يطلق عليهم اسم ( الثوار ) وكان اول انطباع لدى تلك الملايين ان هؤلاء اسوأ من الوحوش المفترسة فهم لا يعرفون معنى الشرف ولا الكرامة الانسانية ولا الرحمة ولا الاسلام ولا قيم القبيلة .
ان ما جرى في ليبيا هو الاسوأ في كل الوطن العربي خلال مئات السنين ، وحتى قتل العائلة المالكة العراقية ورغم انه جريمة الا انه اخف مما حدث في ليبيا فالقتل تم في العراق بسرعة وبالرصاص وسحلت جثة عبدالاله ونوري السعيد فقط ، كما انها اسوأ من جرائم الاحتلالين الامريكي والايراني للعراق لان المحتل اجنبي واستعماري ، لذلك فان جرائم من استخدمهم النيتو كواجهات لاسقاط النظام في ليبيا هي الاسوأ في تاريخ العرب الحديث وربما القديم ايضا ، وهي من بين اسوأ جرائم العصر الحديث في العالم التي شجعتها امريكا وفرنسا وبريطانيا وايطاليا وطبعا اسرائيل ، وشارك في تنفيذها عرب منهم امير قطر ، وهذه حقيقة سوف تكون لها عواقب لاحقة وسوف يعاقب كل مجرم ساهم فيها او ايدها مهما طال الزمن .
السؤال المدمر لهذا التيار الاسلاموي هو : ماذا كان رد فعله على الجرائم التي ارتكبت في ليبيا ؟ الجواب واضح جدا فلقد نزع الذئب جلد الحمل عنه بعد ان نجح في خداع ليلى – كما في قصة ليلى والذئب – ورأينا اشد الاسلامويين نقدا للديكتاتوريات ودفاعا عن حقوق الانسان ورفضا للاضطهاد في المراحل السابقة يتسابقون في دعم الزعامة الليبية الجديدة وتهنئتها لمناسبة (النصر ) ، الذي ماكان له ان يتحقق لولا النيتو وامريكا واسرائيل وهذه حقيقة تفقأ عيون كل من ينكرها ، مع الاهمال التام للجرائم والرفض الواضح لاي ادانة لها حتى ولو بالقول انها جرائم فردية !
What happened to the Baha'i s in Iran?
Shahin says we should respect Iran because it has been around for 2500 years. Please twill me what I should respect the fact that they transformed a secular country try to a backward threatening one. They fund terrorists all over the world, mainly the middle east. I find it laughable that you say Iran threatens no one. Lol. Please . They fund and arm Hezbullah for the sole purpose of trying to kill as many Israelis as possible and it's eventual destruction. It is not like they are hiding the fact that they want to wipe another country off the face of the earth. not a threat? Lol. I have no problem with any country getting nuclear weapons as long as they are not controlled by people who constantly get orders from god. Right now Iran is the only country in the world that can make that claim. That is the biggest threat in the world. Also there never would have been a Mossad in the first place if the the one billion Muslims only allowed them to live in peace. There is a Mossad out of necessity for survival. If you feel Israel is a threat to Iran please inform me when they ever supported the destruction of Iran. If you really want respect then overthrow that disgusting regime that you people have. Actually it is really directed at you personally because I have many iranian friends you agree with me 100%.
The "Supreme Leader" is truly a Supreme Thug! Nothing but a corrupt and lunatic religious politician and has the blood of thousands of innocent Iranians on his hands. The days of the "Supreme Leader" and his phony president, regime, etc. are numbered!
@Jal Then what DO you have a problem with? How Starbucks serves your latte?
"Will Iran get rid of its presidency?"
Why not? All the real power lies in the hands of the mullahs, so I don't really see why they even bother with elections, let-alone a presidency.
For all of you people, who read these articles about Iran, please be aware that Iran / Iranians, Persia / Persians are different than these bunch of Arabs/Arab lovers ruling in Iran. These thugs are, according to what they say, offsprings of Mohammed, so these cruel rulers are not Persian / Iranian. Whatever they do or say does not have anything with Iran and Persia. Hopefully in a near future we will get rid of these turban heads and free Iran, with the help from knowlegeable people. Then the world would see and know how Persian culture is, and who Iranians are.
Persians are descendants of Cyrus the Great, who after defeating the cruel Babylonians rulers, gave all freedom back to the people of Babylon and set the slaves free. Please do a little research and then post whatever you think based on the historical facts.
So what is your point of view,? are the Persians ethinicaly from western Europe of Ancient period???
Frank,
Looks like you did not finish reading my comments. Go back to the very last sentence. If you would have checked simlpy Wikipedia Persian People), although not complete, you would have found a little of what you need to know.
What people need to know is that Mullahs are much more savvy to put themselves in a position such as a dynasty. To understand that you should be familiar with Iran's history and you'll see that their history is dotted by dynasty after dynasty. One other thing that yo should know is that Mullahs been around in Iran for over 1400 years and none of these dynasties that have existed previously included a single "Mullah" dynasty!! Surprised?!
These issues and propagandas are only to mislead the American public to get them ready for another war to justify what will come ahead. Iran is another country trying to survive the threats of war and the sanctions that WE have emposed on them. They are fighting for their life and culture and heritage.
Get real.
Will President Mahmoud eliminate the office of Ayatollah...... would be the more proper question...... I smell a power struggle a brewing
http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/16/will-ayatollah-khamenei-eliminate-the-iranian-presidency/?hpt=hp_bn4
For all the "nice" talk about Muslim Spain "peaceful" co-existence, we fail to realize that in the most moerate Islam (then, as now) it never ceased to be [classic form bigotry] anti the 'other' and extremely violent. Islamofascism was always a matter-of-fact.
To Stoch:
Islamic Fascist Republic of Iran DID threaten to wipe off Israel in 2005 [telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/27/wiran27.xml], it was not mistranslated as LONER "expert" Islamist-appeaser Juan Cole trires to lie: jcpa.org/text/ahmadinejad2-words.pdf), it reiterated it in 2007 (in ther words "Israel and US will soon die [ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3356154,00.html]), but it's nopt new, the Los Angeles Times [articles.latimes.com/1994-08-04/news/mn-23412_1_porous-borders]] reported already in 1994 that (the one responsible for the anti-Jewish racist-Islamic massacre in 1994 at the AMIA building in Buenos Aires: the cleric Mohsen Rabbani said after the massacre: Israel should be wiped off.
Which News organization reported that baseless accusation?! Who published that statement and where have we seen a televised version of such a statement being made?! NO where and there is not an announce of truth in that because what was being at works was another pre-war inflammatory accusations such as th e"Yellow cake" that Saddam Hussein supposedly was purchasing from an African nation. You guys believe such damonizations then you ought to be Gullible.
Get real.
Insane ad Criminal Mullah Regime can not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons.
Read this: Stoning to Death in Iran:
A Crime Against Humanity
Carried Out By the Mullahs' Regime
Some items form the Penal Code of the mullahs' regime:
The penalty for adultery under Article 83 of the penal code, called the Law of Hodoud is flogging (100 lashes of the whip) for unmarried male and female offenders. Married offenders may be punished by stoning regardless of their gender, but the method laid down for a man involves his burial up to his waist, and for a woman up to her neck (article 102)
Article 104 of the Law of Hodoud provides that the stones should not be so large that a person dies after being hit with two of them, nor so small as to be defined as pebbles, but must cause severe injury. This makes it clear that the purpose of stoning is to inflict grievous pain on the victim, in a process leading to his or her slow death.
منظمة عيون الشعب العراقي تفضح العملية المخابراتية لايران ضد الحزب
شبكة المنصور
الان وبعد الزيارة التاريخية لجنوب العراق ، وبالذات الى محافظة واسط ، التي قام بها الرفيق القائد المجاهد عزة ابراهيم الامين العام للحزب وقائد الجهاد والمجاهدين ، والتقى خلالها مع نخبة من ابطال الجنوب وكوادر الحزب هناك ، نستطيع الكشف عن خطة مخابراتية ايرانية قذرة بدأ تنفيذها يأخذ مجرى منهجيا في العام الماضي بهدف اختراق الحزب او ارباك مناضليه في الخارج ، لان الزيارة كانت عمليا رصاصة الرحمة التي قتلت هذه المؤامرة وقبرتها الى الابد وهو ما سترونه في هذا البيان . فبعد متابعة دقيقة منذ العام الماضي وبطرق فنية كثيرة تمكنا من الكشف الكامل عن خيوط عملية مخابراتية ايرانية شاركت فيها مخابرات عربية هدفها شق الحزب في اطار اجتثاث البعث ، ولكن عن طريق محاولة اختراقه والتحدث باسمه والتشكيك بالقيادة وسلامة نهج الحزب واتهامه بالطائفية وبالتعيينات الكيفية على اساس طائفي ...الخ من هذه القاذورات الايرانية ، وصولا للهدف الاقذر وهو تفتيت الحزب والقضاء عليه .
لكن خسأوا فالبعث الذي ركع امريكا وجرها الى قبرها في العراق عبر مقاومته المسلحة والسياسية وقدم اكثر من 140 الف شهيد بعد الغزو ومع ذلك بقي قويا ومتماسكا وقادرا الان وفي المستقبل على حماية كيانه التنظيمي وهويته الفكرية وتاريخه الناصع . لقد اعتقد هؤلاء الجواسيس بانهم نجحوا في خلق ارتباك لدى بعض الرفاق خارج العراق ، نقول خارج العراق لان الرفاق في الداخل يعرفون الحقيقة كاملة ويدركون ان لا وجود لاي من الظواهر التي روجتها عناصر المؤامرة الايرانية ، نتيجة ما نشروه من اكاذيب ومنها تزوير بعض رسائل الرئيس الشهيد صدام حسين ونسب معلومات له تشكك بالقيادة المجاهدة التي يمثلها الرفيق المناضل عزة ابراهيم الامين العام للحزب وقائد الجهاد والمجاهدين ، وترويج هؤلاء لفكرة وجود تمييز طائفي في الحزب وان اعضاء القيادة من طائفة واحدة ، وان هناك تعيينات جديدة في القيادة على هذا الاساس الطائفي ، ورغم ان هذه الاكذوبة من ترويج الاحتلال وعملاء امريكا وايران وهي قديمة الا ان هؤلاء بسبب غبائهم وحقدهم لم يدركوا ان شعبنا يقرا في اللبن وهو مفتح العينين ، لذلك تركناهم يواصلون نشر المعلومات ويرسلون الرسائل لرفاق كثيرين ونحن نتابعهم بدقة ونكشف اتصالاتهم ونحدد اماكنهم وعناوينهم واسمائهم حتى تم الكشف عن تلك الاسماء والعناصر واعددنا ملفا شاملا بالامر سوف يوضع تحت تصرف الجهات المعنية بالمتابعة من النوع الاخر .
ولكي نضع الجميع في صورة كاملة عما جرى لابد ان نشير الى ان الحملة الارهابية الاخيرة على مناضلي البعث والتي ادت الى اعتقال اكثر من 900 مناضل بعثي وغير بعثي حتى الان وتعرضهم التعذيب واجبار البعض ممن لم تعد لهم صلة بالحزب منذ الغزو على التوقيع على افادات مزورة تدعم قصة الانقلاب البعثي المزعوم والذي روجته في ان واحد امريكا وايران عبر مخابراتهما ، نقول كانت هذه الحملة هي هدف من اهداف هذه الخطة المخابراتية الحاقدة ، والتي بدات بادعاء التحدث باسم بعض تنظيمات جنوب العراق ونشر اكاذيب حول تعيينات حزبية على اسس طائفية ووجود من يميز طائفيا ضد ابناء الجنوب ، وقيام هؤلاء بمخاطبة مناضلين معروفين خارج العراق لاجل بث الارباك واكتساب بعض الصدقية وتمثيل دور البعثي المخلص الشاكي من ظلم او اخطاء ارتكبت من قبل قيادات حزبية واتهامها بالرشوة والفساد ..الخ . وقد ابلغنا بعض رفاقنا الذين استلموا تلك الرسائل واتفقنا معهم على ابقاء الاتصال بهذه الزمرة واطالة التحدث معهم عبر الرسائل من اجل تحديد اماكنهم ومعرفة اسماءهم وتحديد طرق اتصالاتهم وبمن يتصلون ، وكان ذلك يتطلب الصبر لفترة طويلة من اجل اكمال رصد هذه الزمرة العميلة ، وبالفعل تم ذلك بكل نجاح وبعيدا عن الثرثرة والضجيج واثارة الجدل بالرد عليهم او تفنيد ما روجوه ، وهي حالة اثارت غضب الكثير من الرفاق الذين كانوا يريدون ردا سريعا وحاسما يكذب ما يطرحون من اكاذيب وتزويرات .
وعدم الرد ايضا اثار غضب هؤلاء لان احد اهدافهم هو تركيز الانظار عليهم وعلى ما يروجون من اكاذيب باسم تنظيمات الجنوب ، فدفعهم ذلك للمقتل في سلوكهم وهو كشف اسماء مناضلين في الداخل والخارج وادعاء انهم يحتلون مواقع معينة في الحزب ونشر ذلك في مواقع عميلة ، وترويج هذه الاكاذيب كي تصل لاكبر عدد ممكن وتسهيل اعتقال او اغتيال من لفقوا اكاذيب حوله وحول موقعه الحزبي . ان هذا التصرف اكد لكل البعثيين في الخارج ممن ارتبكوا بسبب نشر مقاطع من رسائل نسبت للرفيق الشهيد الخالد صدام حسين زورت وقلد خطه ، ان هذه الزمرة ليست بعثية او انها كانت بعثية لكنها ارتدت وتعاونت مع الاحتلال واجهزته الامنية لان البعثي يحافظ على اسرار الحزب ويحمي رفاقه من القتل والاعتقال حتى عندما يختلف معهم ومهما كان هذا الخلاف . لقد كان نشر اسماء وكشفها لهؤلاء المناضلين هو القشة التي كسرت ظهرهم ، وسهلت علينا تحديد من هم وهويتهم واهدافهم ومن يزودهم ببعض المعلومات الحزبية القديمة والتي كان يملكها بعض من فصلوا من الحزب .
وفيما يلي بعضا من هذه المعلومات التي تم كشفها بالتعاون مع رفاق لنا ممن تمت مراسلتهم وسنكشف بقية المعلومات في وقت لاحق :
1. قمنا بعملية تدقيق ومتابعة للبريد الالكتروني لمن ارسل بعض هذه الرسائل وقد وجدنا عن طريق نفس العنوان البريدي الذي استخدمه المتأمرون شخص اسمه علي الياسري كتب مقالا باسم علي الياسري في موقع ( الحقائق ) وهو من المواقع العميلة في المنطقة الخضراء وماكتبه هذا المعادي هو حرفيا نفس الرسالة الاولى التي ارسلها لبعض الشبكات الوطنية والتي وقعها باسم لفيف من البعثيين في جنوب العراق ولكن مع بعض التحوير في مقدمتها وكانت هذه العملية غبية لدرجة ان هذا الشخص تصور اننا لن ندقق ونتابع ونبحث في كل مكان ، لذلك كتب المقال ونشره باسمه ووضع عنوانه البريدي عليه ثم استخدم نفس الاسم والعنوان في ارسال الشكاوى باسم تنظيمات الجنوب الى رفاق لنا عدة مرات واستخدم نفس الاسم معهم وهو علي الياسري دون تردد !
2. قام نفس الشخص بارسال رسالة قريبة من صيغة الرسالة السابقة الى موقعي الرشيد نت ، الذي تديره المخابرات الايرانية مباشرة كما سنرى ، وكادر نوري المرادي وباسلوب ثاني علما انه اشار في رسالته الى الشبكتين الوطنيتين المنصور والبصرة بانها خاصة وليست للنشر .. نرفق نص ماكتبه ايضا للاطلاع .
3. وكانت المفاجئة هي اكتشاف مكان ومصدر الرسائل حيث اكتشفنا ان مصدر اي بي (IP) علي الياسري العراق ولكن المفاجئة ان لديه عنوانين متسلسلين ( 81.90.18.3 ) ( 81.90.18.4 ) ، اي منظومتي انترنت وهذا لايحدث الا في حالة واحدة وهي ان لهذا الشخص امكانيات لايستطيع تحملها وحده الا اذا كانت خلفه جهة متنفذه وحددنا المكان وهو المنطقة الخضراء والشخص وهو شخص غير بعثي ومعادي للبعث .
الاي بي الاول ( 81.90.18.3 ) - ارسل منه الرسالة الاولى بتاريخ 23 / 12 / 2010 يوم الخميس الساعة ( 10:05 ) مساءا . والتي وقعها باسم لفيف من البعثيين .
الاي بي الثاني ( 81.90.18.4 ) - ارسل منه الرسالة الثانية بتاريخ 07 / 01 / 2011 يوم الجمعة الساعة ( 11:08 ) مساءا . والتي وقعها تحت اسم رفاقكم في تنظيمات محافظات البصرة وذي قار وبابل وكربلاء وواسط .
4. وهكذا وبالوصول الى هذه المعلومات الدقيقة تاكدنا ان علي الياسري يقوم بعملية مخابراتية مكشوفة تقف وراءها ايران ونوري المالكي من خلال مراسلة اكثر من جهة في وقت واحد لعمل عملية ارتباك وتشويش متعمد ومدروس بدقه وتساعده في ذلك عناصر عميلة اخرى خصوصا موقع الرشيد نت .
المرفقات
1- ماكتبه علي الياسري في موقع الحقائق بتاريخ 24 / 12 / 2010 .. اي بعد يوم واحد من ارساله رسالته الاول الى شبكة المنصور وشبكة البصرة ، والتي وقعها باسم لفيف من البعثيين ووضع معه عنوانه الالكتروني في الحالتين وهو alialaesery@yahoo .
هذا نص ما كتبه ندرجه باخطاءه : ( البعثيين طائفيين شوفينيين لا يثقون بالشيعة ) وهذا رابط ماكتبه http://www.alhakaek.com/news.php?action=view&id=16428
يتضح مما تقدم ان المدعو علي الياسري يعمل تحت امرة المخابرات الايرانية ومخابرات المالكي التابعة لها وينتحل صفة البعثي المتحدث باسم تنظيمات الجنوب ، وبنفس الوقت وبغباء منقطع النظير وكأي عميل ينشر مقالات باسمه وبنفس العنوان الذي يرسل به رسائله باسم تنظيمات الجنوب معتقدا بان البعث واجهزته الامنية لن تتابعه وتعرف من هو ومن يقف وراءه !
2- ومن اللافت للنظر انه بعد اتصالاتهم ببعض الرفاق المعروفين في الخارج وطلب هؤلاء منهم ابقاء الامر داخل الحزب ومعالجته فيه وليس عبر الاعلام اذا كانوا بعثيين فعلا فان هؤلاء كشفوا عن حجم التامر ومن يشارك فيه ففي رسائل بعثوها الى اكثر من رفيق تكررت فيها معلومات متوقعة ومنها ما يلي
بداية الرسالة :
من: Ali Ali >
التاريخ: January 27, 2011 4:37:16 PM GMT+02:00
الى الرفيق (...)
الموضوع : رسالة توضيحية
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم تحية واحترام وأرجو ان تكون بخير الأخ والرفيق العزيز (....) المحترم استلمنا رسالتك الأخيرة وفي الوقت الذي نتفهم الأسباب التي دفعتك للكتابة لنا بهذه الصيغة وهو ما لم نكن نتمناه ونود ان نوضح لك حيثيات هذا الموضوع كي نلتمس لأنفسنا ولكم العذر بعد استبيان الحقيقة ناصعة جلية وكما هي لا يعتريها لبس أو غموض أو تأويل. التصريح نعم صدر من قبلنا وأرسل إلى أربعة مواقع وهي ( المنصور، البصرة، القادسيتين ) وأنت خير من يعرف توجه وخلفية هذه المواقع الوطنية المجاهدة والموقع الرابع موقع خاص بنا وتحت إشرافنا ولا تنشر فيه كلمة دون ان نوافق عليها ومن السهولة بمكان ان تستفسر بنفسك في هذه اللحظة من هذه المواقع الثلاث للتأكد من صدقنا في ذلك ولو اننا على ثقة مطلقة ان هذه المواقع الثلاث سوف لن تنشر الرسائل أو التصريح ونقدر ذلك لان الصورة غير واضحة أمامهم ولهم الحق في ذلك وغايتنا في إرسال ما يصدر من قبلنا سواء كان بيان أو رسالة أو تصريح إلى هذه المواقع الثلاث يتمثل في جانبين الأول لكونها مواقع وطنية وهي من حصة الجميع باستثناء الخونة والعملاء والجانب الثاني كي تكون الصورة مكتملة ومتسلسلة حيث ان الصورة الآن فيها ضبابية مما حدا بهم إلى نشر بيان ضد رفاقهم وأخوتهم فيه الكثير من الشتائم والاتهامات بالخيانة والتجسس والعمالة للأجنبي دون ان يتبينوا حقيقة الأمور وأيضا نعذرهم في ذلك لأنهم ينشرون ما يرد إليهم.
بخصوص استفسارك نقول اننا لم نرسل اي رسالة أو تصريح إلى موقع الكادر وأيضا نشر التصريح في موقع الرشيد نت ومواقع أخرى ونقول وبثقة اننا لا نتعامل مع هذه المواقع ولا نتراسل معهم ولا نسمح لأنفسنا بالتعامل معهم سلبا أو إيجابا لمعرفتنا المسبقة بنواياهم ودوافعهم وخلفياتهم وأود العرض بهذا الصدد ان العشرات بل المئات من الرسائل ترد إلينا من هذه المواقع ومن غيرها تحاول استمالتنا وإغرائنا إلا اننا ومن جانب الحرص ولمعرفتنا المسبقة بدوافعهم رفضنا الخوض في طروحاتهم وعروضهم وكتبنا لهم رفضنا المطلق بان نكون جسرا لتمرير مؤامراتهم وسوف لن يغنموا شيئا من محاولاتهم واليك صورتين من مئات الرسائل ومن موقعين مشبوهين لتعرف حقيقة الأمور.
( هذه صورة الرسالة التي وردتنا من موقع الكادر موقع المرتد نوري المرادي )
noori :
Från: almoradi noori
Till: "00 alkader" >
Datum: 14 januari 2011 09:56
قبلاتنا لكم ايها الأحبة في تنظيمات الفرات الأوسط والجنوب من رفاقكم ومن جميع الاخيار على امتداد ساحة الوطن الذبيح وفي ارجاء المعمورة وحيثما نجد نفسا وطنيا خالصا .. سنكون سندكم الأمين الذي لا يخاف في الحق لومة لائم ونعرض امامكم ان استجبتم لعرضنا الدعم الذي تطلبون ومن ضمن ذلك فتح صدورنا وقلوبنا ومواقعنا لكم وامامكم ونثمن ونبارك وثبتكم البطولية نحن اخوتكم اطلبوا منا ماتحتاجون ماديا ومعنويا وننتظر منكم القرار الذي يضع حدا لزمرة الخيانة والتامر والعشائرية بوركتم وبورك مسعاكم ومعا في الدرب سائرون
خالص التحيات
رفاقكم في الكادر
عنهم د نوري
وأبو زهراء
( هذه صورة الرسالة التي وردت الينا من موقع الرشيد نت )
16/1/11, Ali Ali wrote:
Subject: رسالة خاصة إلى الرفاق الاعزاء تحتاج إلى رد
To: baas1968@yahoo.com
Date: 16 January, 2011, 6:16 AM
تحية رفاقية بشرف كبير وعنفوان يليق بالبعثيين من امثالكم تحدثتم بهذه الصراحة ولايخفى عليكم ان حزبنا يمر اليوم بمرحلة صعبة وسنجعل تحت تصرفكم خدمات هذا المنبر اي الرشيد نت فهو موقعكم وتعبيرا عن تعاطفنا معكم ننشر رسائلكم وماتودون نشره مستقبلا ونامل التواصل ونقترح عليكم ارسالها الينا مباشرة مما يسهل سرعة النشر والدقة في الطرح.. رفاقكم قي شبكة الرشيد نت
هذه نماذج عسى ان تجدون فيها إجابة شافية وهي واضحة جلية لكون هذه المواقع تطلب ان نكتب لهم مباشرة تسهيلا لسرعة النشر حسب الادعاء ونحن لا يمكن ان نكتب لهم رغم العرض وحسب ما تشاهدون. )
انتهى الاقتباس .
ماذا وجدت منظمتنا ؟
ان منظمتنا الساهرة على امن العراق وشعبه ومناضليه توصلت الى ما يلي :
1 – ان علي الياسري يعمل في جهاز مخابرات نوري المالكي وهو مقيم في المنطقة الخضراء ، وطبعا فان هذا الجهاز تابع للمخابرات الايرانية . وهو يستخدم اسماء متعددة منها حامد الكرافي ومحمد دهش ونعمة وابن الشهيد بالاضافة لعلي الياسري . فبعد ان كشفت لعبة علي الياسري تحول الاسم واصبح حامد الكرافي ، وقام هذا الشخص المتعدد الاسماء بارسال اكثر من 120 رسالة للشبكات الوطنية حول الاكاذيب معتقدا انه سيؤثر في البعض وكرر فيها اكاذيبه . وكان تغيير الاي بي يعود لتغيير مقهى الانترنيت . ولا يقتصر دور هذا الشخص على كتابة البيانات وارسال الرسائل بل يقوم ايضا بكتابة تعليقات على ما ينشر في موقع الرشيد نت مملوءة بالتشهير والاكاذيب عن الحزب ومناضليه مستخدما اسماء كثيرة كي يبدو ان من يعلق هم اشخاص كثيرين ، ويبدو ان مخابرات المالكي شكت بكشف مصدر الرسائل الاولى فامرت الشخص المعني بالذهاب الى مقاهي انترنيت للتمويه ، ولكن الشخص المعني غاب عنه انه متابع عبر رسائله اينما ذهب ، وفيما يلي جدولا بالايبيات التي استعملت في ارسال الرسائل :
تاريخ ارسال الرسالة
رقم الاي بي
البريد الالكتروني
الاسم
No
Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:05:50
81.90.18.3
alialaesery@yahoo.com
Ali Alyasri
1
Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:07:21
81.90.18.2
alialaesery@yahoo.com
Ali Alyasri
2
Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:08:22
81.90.18.4
alialaesery@yahoo.com
Ali Alyasri
3
Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:10:25
81.90.18.5
alialaesery@yahoo.com
Ali Alyasri
4
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:42:34
81.90.18.7
alialaesery@yahoo.com
Ali Ali
5
تاريخ ارسال الرسالة
رقم الاي بي
البريد الالكتروني
الاسم
No
Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:39:32
81.90.18.4
ahmeada22@yahoo.com
Ahmead Ahmead
1
Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:52:58
81.90.18.7
ahmeada22@yahoo.com
Ahmead Ahmead
2
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:34:46
81.90.18.2
ahmeada22@yahoo.com
Ahmead Ahmead
3
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:38:36
81.90.18.3
ahmeada22@yahoo.com
Ahmead Ahmead
4
Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:39:16
81.90.18.5
ahmeada22@yahoo.com
Ahmead Ahmead
5
تاريخ ارسال الرسالة
رقم الاي بي
البريد الالكتروني
الاسم
No
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:52:32
81.90.18.7
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
1
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:12:34
81.90.18.2
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
2
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 03:24:12
81.90.18.4
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
3
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 03:24:41
81.90.18.5
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
4
Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:48:21
81.90.18.3
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
5
تاريخ ارسال الرسالة
رقم الاي بي
البريد الالكتروني
الاسم
No
Thursday, July 7, 2011 8:30 AM
109.224.28.227
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
Sat, 09 Jul 2011 01:13:58
109.224.28.1
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
تاريخ ارسال الرسالة
رقم الاي بي
البريد الالكتروني
الاسم
No
Sat, 09 Jul 2011 01:57:44
109.224.29.126
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
Sat, 09 Jul 2011 02:23:59
109.224.29.251
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
Sat, 09 Jul 2011 02:01:43
109.224.29.254
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
تاريخ ارسال الرسالة
رقم الاي بي
البريد الالكتروني
الاسم
No
Sat, 09 Jul 2011 00:38:33
109.224.13.25
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
Sat, 09 Jul 2011 02:21:23
109.224.13.97
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:08:53
195.96.148.9
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:53:28 / مساءا
109.70.68.132
hatam94@yahoo.com
حاتم حامد
تاريخ ارسال الرسالة
رقم الاي بي
البريد الالكتروني
الاسم
No
August 10, 2011 12:48 AM
109.224.42.125
mohemed56@yahoo.com
محمد دهش
Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:05:09
109.70.68.134
mohemed56@yahoo.com
محمد دهش
وعبر متابعة هذه الرسائل وغيرها عرفنا المصدر بدقة ، وتاكد لدينا انها من مصدر واحد واحيانا من كومبيوتر واحد يرسل باكثر من عنوان في نفس الوقت او رسالة بعد اخرى .
2- تؤكد المراسلات والاتصالات التي رصدناها بانه وضعت خطة بالتنسيق مع جهاز مخابرات عربي بالاضافة للمخابرات الايرانية هدفها تفتيت الحزب وتصفيته في الخارج تمهيدا لنقل عدوى التصفية للداخل ، ولذلك تركزت حملة الاتصالات وتوزيع البيانات المزورة على الخارج ولم تشمل مباشرا الداخل ، خصوصا وان كوادر الداخل تعرف على وجه اليقين بان تنظيمات الجنوب تعمل بصورة طبيعية ولا توجد فيها مشاكل كالتي روجت المخابرات الايرانية عبر علي الياسري وباسم تنظيمات الجنوب مثلها .
3- تم تسخير كل العملاء المتسترين باسم الوطنية ، او باسم البعث وتحت غطاءه مثل محمد يونس الاحمد الذي وصل سقوطه حدودا مذهلة بقيامه بتسريب رسائل استلمها من قيادة الحزب حينما كان يعمل فيه وقبل طرده ، ونشرها في موقع جاسوس ايراني هو محمد الدليمي بعد ان قامت مخابرات معينة بتقليد خط الرئيس الشهيد صدام حسين ونسب اقوال له غير موجودة في الرسائل الاصلية . وكان الهدف الرئيسي هو تضليل رفاقنا او ارباكهم . وبالطبع فان هذا النوع من الدعاية السوداء روجته وتروجه ايران والمخابرات الامريكية . كما انه عرض على هؤلاء الجواسيس ( علي الياسري باسماءه الكثيرة ) التوحد معهم وتعيين بعضهم في ( قيادته ) وعرض عليهم المال ووجه لهم محمد الدليمي دعوة لزيارة سوريا على نفقة محمد يونس الاحمد .
4- ان نوري المرادي الذي تعرى كليا وكشفت حقيقته تطوع وتبرع بالمال لدعم هذه المؤامرة الايرانية ، والسؤال هو من اين هذا المال الذي يتبرع به نوري لكل من يعمل ضد البعث والمقاومة ؟
5- ان محمد الدليمي حاول اختراق الحزب بالتقرب من مناضليه وشبكاته الوطنية من خلال تكليفه بواسطة المخابرات الايرانية بانشاء موقع الرشيد ونشره بيانات الحزب ومقالات الرفاق البعثيين وقيامه بالاتصال بالرفاق المناضلين المعروفين ومحاولته التقرب منهم على امل ان يضم الى صفوفهم فيحقق هدفه المخابراتي المكلف به لكنه لم ينجح في مسعاه . الان وبعد جمع معلومات دقيقة تأكد لدينا بان هذا الجاسوس هو المسؤول عن اغتيال الرفيق الشهيد الدكتور سعدون حمادي ، حيث ان المخابرات الامريكية التي اعتقلته جندته للعمل معها وكلفته بالتجسس على دكتور حمادي عندما كان في الاسر لدى قوات الاحتلال ، ووضعته في نفس مكان اعتقال الشهيد حمادي ونقل معلومات عنه للاحتلال فحواها انه كان صلبا ومتمسكا بهويته الوطنية والبعثية فتقرر تصفيته عن طريق دس سم في طعامه وهو العمل الذي قام به محمد الدليمي ، وبعد ذلك وقبل موعد التاثير القاتل للسم اطلق سراح الشهيد سعدون حمادي لكنه توفي في المستشفى بعد ذلك ، لذلك فان محمد الدليمي سيحاسب قريبا على اغتيال الدكتور سعدون حمادي .
وبعد ان اطلق سراحه سلمته القوات الامريكية للحكومة العميلة تم تجنيده من قبل المخابرات الايرانية للعمل لصالحها وارسل الى سوريا وكلف باختراق تنظيمات البعثيين العراقيين فيها ، وزود بالمال اللازم لانشاء شبكة هي الرشيد نت يتقرب من خلالها من البعثيين . لكنه حينما فشل في تحقيق اختراق البعثيين في سوريا وفي الالتحاق بالاعلام الوطني الداعم للمقاومة اخذ ينفذ مخططا مخابراتيا ايرانيا علنيا محوره تشويه صورة الحزب والقائد الشهيد صدام حسين وكشف بعض كوادر الحزب عن طريق نشر اسماءهم واعلان مستويات حزبية لهم تكلفهم حياتهم ، وكان هدفه هو تسليط الاضواء عليهم وتسهيل اعتقالهم او اغتيالهم .
وبعد ان بدأ فصل اخر من فصول المؤامرة وهو تفتيت الحزب من داخله كلف بدور اخر فعاد مرة اخرى يروج اكاذيب حول الحزب خصوصا في موضوع ( وحدة الحزب وتصحيح المسار ) ...الخ ثم اضيف موضوع تنظيمات الجنوب والادعاء بان التعيينات في قيادات الحزب تتم على اساس طائفي . وكان الهدف الرسمي للمخابرات الايرانية هو تفتيت الحزب خارج العراق من خلال نشر معلومات كاذبة وتزوير الحقائق وتلفيق القصص المسيئة للبعث ومناضليه ، وكلف محمد يونس الاحمد بتزويده بما لديه من معلومات او مراسلات لاجل استغلالها بعد تزوير بعضها من اجل نشر الارتباك في صفوف البعثيين في الخارج .
ان منظمتنا تعلن كل ذلك الان بعد ان زار الرفيق القائد عزة ابراهيم جنوب العراق والتقى بكوادر الحزب ومقاتلي المقاومة وتحاور معهم واستمع اليهم واستمعوا اليه وهي حادثة تسقط كل الاكاذيب وتؤكد بان تنظيمات الجنوب لديها اتصال مباشر مستمر ولم ينقطع في اي وقت وظرف مع الرفيق الامين العام وان قصة عدم قدرتها على ايصال رايها له محض اكاذيب مخابراتية ، لذلك فان منظمتنا تعلن بلا مواربة بان جواسيس ايران من امثال علي الياسري ( باسمائه المتعددة حامد الكرافي ومحمد دهش ونعمة وابن الشهيد ...الخ ) ومحمد الدليمي وغيرهما ، قد كشفوا وكانت الاحداث خير اداة لكشفهم فلم تكشفهم الاتهامات بل الوقائع المادية فهذا هو مصير كل عميل وجاسوس . ان هؤلاء الجواسيس الذين تسببوا في استشهاد الدكتور سعدون حمادي وفي اعتقال مئات البعثيين داخل العراق ، وقاموا بمحاولة تشويه صورة البعث بترويج الاكاذيب يتحملون مسؤولية كل ذلك وسيأتي الوقت الذي يقدمون فيه لمحاكم الشعب لتلقي جزاءهم العادل .
ان منظمتنا وهي تكشف عن كل ذلك تدعو رفاقنا البعثيين ، خصوصا في الشبكات الوطنية ، الى اهمال هؤلاء وعدم الرد على اكاذيبهم القادمة بعد كشف اكبر اكاذيبهم من قبل منظمتنا وهي اكذوبة تمرد تنظيمات الجنوب وتزوير رسائل الشهيد صدام حسين ، وترك هؤلاء الانجاس يسبحون في قذاراتهم وعمالتهم . وسبب طلبنا عدم الرد عليهم هو ان خطة المخابرات الامريكية والايرانية المعروفة لابراز عملاءها تتضمن ضرورة قيام هؤلاء العملاء بالاسراف في الشتم وتلفيق الاكاذيب من اجل اجبار المستهدفين على الرد عليهم في شبكات وطنية معروفة وبذلك تسلط الاضواء عليهم ويشتهرون وتروج اكاذيبهم عن طريق الرد عليها . ان البعث وكل المناضلين لا يحتاجون للرد فنضالهم الراهن وحملهم للبندقية هو خير شهادة لهم .
al iraneen al safween al khawrej weld al mot3a kelan mojremeen, killers and thugs , usa must attck iran and get red of this evil ahmedi nejad.
those al kelab in iran will be sorry
كما أن للأنهار روافد تزودها بالمياه، فإن للديانة الشيعية روافد تزودها بالعقائد والأفكار!!..
أهم هذه الروافد ثلاثة: الديانة اليهودية، والديانة المجوسية، والعنصرية الفارسية.
الرافد الأول: الديانة اليهودية
الملهم الأول للتشيع هو اليهودي عبد الله بن سبأ (قدس سره الشريف !!)، وقد تكلمنا عنه في الرسالة السابعة ضمن هذه السلسلة، وهي بعنوان (آية الله العظمى عبد الله بن سبأ).
تبدوا أصابع اليهودية واضحة في التشيع من خلال بعض المعتقدات التي تعتبر من أساسيات الديانة الشيعية، وهذه بعض النماذج على الاستمداد من اليهودية:
1) عقيدة الوصية:
حيث يؤمن الشيعة بأن الله تعالى اختار علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله تعالى عنه وصيا من بعد الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم:
● "عن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام قال: عُرج بالنبي صلى الله عليه وآله إلى السماء مائة وعشرين مرة، ما من مرة إلا وقد أوصى الله النبي بولاية علي والأئمة من بعده، أكثر مما أوصاه بالفرائض". (بصائر الدرجات لمحمد بن الحسن الصفار، ص 99)
وقد جاء في التوراة:
● "فكلم الرب موسى قائلا: ليوكل الرب إله أرواح جميع البشر رجلا على الجماعة، يخرج أمامهم ويدخل أمامهم، ويخرجهم ويدخلهم لكيلا تكون جماعة الرب كالغنم التي لا راعي لها، فقال الرب لموسى: خذ يشوع بن نون رجلا فيه روح، وضع يدك عليه، وأوقفه قُدام العازار الكاهن وقُدام كل الجماعة، وأوصه أمام أعينهم .. ففعل موسى كما أمره الرب، أخذ يشوع وأوقفه قدام العازار الكاهن وقدام كل الجماعة، ووضع يده عليه وأوصاه كما تكلم الرب على يد موسى". (الإصحاح 27)
نلاحظ هنا اتفاق اليهود والشيعة على وجوب تنصيب وصي بعد النبي!!
2) المهدي المنتظر:
يعتقد الشيعة بأن مهديهم عندما يخرج يدعوا الله تعالى باسمه العبراني (لغة اليهود)!! .. كما صرح بذلك شيخهم محمد بن إبراهيم النعماني (الغيبة ص 169) وغيره. ولا شك في أن هذا الاعتقاد يعكس الانتماء الحقيقي للذين وضعوا هذه النصوص.
كما يعتقدون أن المهدي سيدعو إلى دين جديد!!:
● روى النعماني عن أبي جعفر أنه قال: "يقوم القائم بأمر جديد، وكتاب جديد على العرب شديد ..". (الغيبة للنعماني ص 154)
● وللطوسي كتاب يحمل نفس الاسم (الغيبة) روى فيه عن أبي عبد الله أنه قال: "إذا قام القائم جاء بأمر غير الذي كان". (الغيبة للطوسي ص 283)
ولكن، ما هو الدين الجديد الذي سيدعو إليه مهدي الشيعة يا ترى؟!:
● عن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام قال: "لا تذهب الدنيا حتى يخرج رجل مني يحكم بحكومة آل داوُد ولا يسأل بينة ..". (الكافي للكليني 1/398) و (بصائر الدرجات للصفار ص 279)
3) عقيدة البداء:
ينسب الشيعة البداء إلى الله تعالى، والبداء هو: (الظهور بعد الخفاء)!! .. أو (نشأة رأي جديد)!! .. ومؤداه أن الله قد يقضي بشيء، ثم يندم عليه فيقضي بأمر جديد!! .. ونسبة هذا البداء إلى الله تعالى كفر محض.
وقد ذكر الكليني في الكافي عدة روايات في البداء:
● "ما عُبد الله بشيء مثل البداء".
● "ما عُظم الله بمثل البداء".
ويذكر المرجع أبو القاسم الخوئي فضل البداء فيقول:
● "والقول بالبداء: يوجب انقطاع العبد إلى ربه، وطلبه إجابة دعائه منه، وكفاية مهماته، وتوفيقه للطاعة، وإبعاده عن المعصية". (البيان في تفسير القرآن للخوئي ص 392)
ما أصل هذا المعتقد؟! .. إليكم هذه النصوص اليهودية:
● جاء عن موسى عليه السلام وهو يخاطب ربه: "ارجع عن حمو غضبك، واندم على الشر بشعبك". (سفر الخروج، الإصحاح 32)
● وذكروا أن الله قال: "ندمتُ على أني قد جعلت شاول ملِكا، لأنه رجع من ورائي ولم يقم كلامي". (سِفر صموئيل، الإصحاح 15)
4) تقديس النفس وإهانة الآخرين:
يسمي الشيعة أنفسهم (الخاصة) وأهل السنة (العامة)!..
وكذا اليهود، فهم (شعب الله المختار) وسائر الناس (الأمميون)!..
تأمل هذه النصوص الشيعية:
● عن أبي عبد الله قال: "إن الله جعل لنا شيعة، فجعلهم من نوره وصبغهم في رحمته". (بصائر الدرجات للصفار ص 70) و (بحار الأنوار للمجلسي 67/74)
● وعنه قال: "خلق الله تبارك وتعالى شيعتنا من طينة مخزونة لا يشذ منها شاذ، ولا يدخل فيها داخل أبدا إلى يوم القيامة". (المحاسن لأحمد بن محمد البرقي ص 134)
● وعنه قال: "نحن خيرة الله من خلقه، وشيعتنا خيرة الله من أمة نبيه". (الأمالي للطوسي ص 76)
● ويروي الكليني في الكافي عن محمد بن علي الباقر: "أن الناس كلهم أولاد بغايا ما خلا شيعتنا". (الكافي 8/239)
من أين جاءت هذه النفسية القبيحة؟! .. الجواب: من اليهود!..
وإليك بعض نصوصهم المقدسة:
● "لأنك أنت شعب مقدس للرب إلهك، إياك قد اختار الرب إلهك، لتكون له شعبا أخص من جميع الشعوب الذين على وجه الأرض". (سِفر التثنية، الإصحاح 7)
● "فالآن إن سمعتم لصوتي وحفظتم عهدي تكونون لي خاصة من بين جميع الشعوب، فإن لي كل الأرض، وأنتم تكونون لي مملكةُ كهنة وأمة مقدسة". (سِفر الخروج، الإصحاح 19)
● وجاء في التلمود: "تتميز أرواح اليهود عن باقي الأرواح بأنها جزء من الله، كما أن الابن جزء من والده".
الرافد الثاني: الديانة المجوسية
كانت المجوسية هي الديانة الرسمية في الإمبراطورية الفارسية، تقام لها بيوت النار التي لا تنطفئ!
يقوم على أمر هذه النار طبقة من الكهنة، يحتلون أعلى درجة في السلم السياسي والاجتماعي في الإمبراطورية بعد الملوك مباشرة.
أطفأ الإسلام هذه النار التي كانت تعبد من دون الله، فاشتعلت النيران في قلوب السَدَنة، وامتد الحقد المجوسي خلال التاريخ إلى اليوم!
المهدوية هي أساس العقيدة الشيعية، ومن لا يؤمن بالمهدي المنتظر الغائب لا يعد مؤمنا عند الشيعة، ولا تقبل أعماله وإن صلى وصام مائة سنة!
لاحظ التأثير المجوسي في هذه العقيدة المهدوية:
● "عن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام قال: إن لصاحب هذا الأمر بيتا يقال له بيت الحَمد، فيه سراج يزهر منذ وُلد إلى يوم يقوم بالسيف، لا يطفأ". (الغيبة للنعماني ص 239) و (الغيبة للطوسي ص 467)
يا ترى، ما هو هذا (السراج الذي لا يطفأ)، وهل (بيت الحَمد) تسمية تقية لـ (بيت النار)؟!
جعل الشيعة للمهدي عشرات الأسماء، كما أن لله تعالى الأسماء الحسنى!!
أتدرون ما هو الاسم السابع والأربعون له؟
إنه (خسرو مجوس)!!
● ذكر النوري الطبرسي زنديقهم الأكبر (وكلهم زنادقة) أسماء المهدي، فكان الاسم السابع والأربعون (خسرو مجوس). (النجم الثاقب في أحوال الإمام الحجة الغائب للنوري الطبرسي، 1/185)
وجعلوا من أسمائه الأخرى (برويز بابا) و(بهرام) !!
لذلك، كان العداء المجوسي للصحابة الذين أطفئوا نار المجوسية عداء شديدا، وخاصة الفاروق عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله تعالى عنه، الذي نال من العداء والحقد النصيب الأكبر لدرجة لا يمكن تخيلها!
● يقول نعمة الله الجزائري: "قد وردت في روايات الخاصة أن الشيطان يغل بسبعين غلا من حديد جهنم ويساق إلى المحشر، فينظر ويرى رجلا أمامه يقوده ملائكة العذاب وفي عنقه مائة وعشرون غلا من أغلال جهنم، فيدنو الشيطان إليه ويقول: ما فعل الشقي حتى زاد علَي في العذاب وأنا أغويت الخلق وأوردتهم موارد الهلاك؟ .. فيقول عمر للشيطان: ما فعلت شيئا سوى أني غصبت خلافة علي بن أبي طالب)!!. (الأنوار النعمانية للجزائري 1/819)
الرافد الثالث: العنصرية الفارسية
لم يكن دخول كل الفرس إلى الإسلام دخولا حميدا، لقد أسلم الكثير من أهل فارس فحسُن إسلامهم، وظهر منهم الفقهاء والمحدثين والقادة، وقدموا خدمات عظيمة للإسلام والمسلمين.
ولكن البعض الآخر منهم دخلوا الإسلام ظاهرا، وهم يبطنون حقدا شديدا على المسلمين أن تجرؤوا وهزموا دولتهم القوية العتيدة.
ولذلك، ظهر في التاريخ الإسلامي من نسميهم بـ (الشعوبيون)، والشعوبية ظاهرة ارتبطت حصرا بالفرس، إذ لم يظهر هذا العداء المبطن أحيانا، والظاهر أحيانا أخرى للإسلام من قِبل القوميات الأخرى كالأكراد والأتراك والهنود والبربر الذين فتح المسلمون بلادهم.
نظم الفردوسي، ذلك الشاعر الفارسي الشعوبي ملحمة (الشاهنامة) أو (كتاب الملوك)، فأخرج أضغانه بكل وضوح، وأخذ يتباكى على ملكهم الزائل، ويكيل السباب للعرب الجفاة الغلاظ، الذين فتحوا بلاده وأخرجوا قومه من الظلمات إلى النور!!
● يقول الفردوسي معبرا عن حقده وفارسيته المعلنة ومجوسيته المبطنة: "كان الكلب في أصفهان يشرب من الماء البارد، بينما العرب في الصحراء يأكلون الجراد"!!
نرجع إلى العقيدة المهدوية الشيعية، لنرى التأثير الشعوبي الفارسي بوضوح:
ينتظر الفرس رجلا من آل كسرى ينتقم لهم من العرب، فألفوا القصة المعروفة عن زواج الحسين بن علي رضي الله عنهما، من شهربانو بنت كسرى يزدجرد، التي ولدت له ابنه زين العابدين، ثم باقي الأئمة من سلالته، فالمهدي المنتظر عند الشيعة إذا نصفه عربي، من آل البيت النبوي، ونصفه فارسي، من آل البيت الكسروي!! (وما في أَحَد أَحْسن من أَحَد !!)
● روى المجلسي عن النوشجان بن البومردان (لاحظ الاسم!!) قال: "لما جلا الفرس عن القادسية، وبلغ يزدجرد ما كان من رستم وإدالة العرب عليه، وظن أن رستم قد هلك والفرس جميعا، وجاء مبادر وأخبره بيوم القادسية وانجلائها عن خمسين ألف قتيل، خرج يزدجرد هاربا في أهل بيته ووقف بباب الإيوان .. وقال: السلام عليك أيها الإيوان، هاأنذا منصرف عنك، وراجع إليك أنا أو رجل من ولدي لم يدْنُ زمانه ولا أوانه" .. ولما سئل جعفر الصادق عن مقصود كسرى قال: "ذلك صاحبكم القائم بأمر الله عز وجل، السادس من ولدي، قد ولده يزدجرد فهو ولده"!! (بحار الأنوار للمجلسي 51/163)
● وها هو مهديهم المنتظر ينتقم من العرب! فعن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام قال: "إذا خرج القائم لم يكن بينه وبين العرب وقريش إلا السيف". (بحار النوار للمجلسي 52/355)
● وعنه قال: "لو يعلم الناس ما يصنع القائم إذا خرج لأحب أكثرهم ألا يروه مما يقتل من الناس، أما إنه لا يبدأ إلا بقريش فما يأخذ منها إلا السيف". (الغيبة للنعماني ص 234)
ما هذا الحقد الشديد على العرب، وخاصة قريش؟!
إنها الشعوبية العنصرية الفارسية، نفست عن أحقادها من خلال هذه النصوص التي وضعها زنادقتهم ونسبوها لعلماء آل البيت رحمهم الله.
وقديما قال عنهم نصر بن سيار:
قوم يدينون ديناً ما سمعت به ... عن الرسول ولا جاءت به الكتبُ
إن كنت تسألني عن أصل دينهم .. فإن دينهم أن تقتل العرب ُ
* * *
مراجع مقترحة للاستزادة:
1) المهدي المنتظر، هذه الخرافة .. للدكتور طه حامد الدليمي
2) صناعة التشيع .. للدكتور قاسم الطائي
3) بذل المجهود في إثبات مشابهة الرافضة لليهود .. للدكتور عبد الله الجميلي