Editor’s Note: Caitlin Fitz Gerald writes about international affairs and civil-military relations at Gunpowder & Lead. She is currently turning Carl von Clausewitz's On War into an illustrated children's book. You can find her on Twitter at caidid.
By Caitlin Fitz Gerald – Special to CNN
The UN Human Rights Council has released its report on abuses in Syria, and it reads like a catalog of misery and disregard for human life: Arbitrary detentions and disappearances; soldiers ordered to fire on peaceful civilians, including women and children, and the execution of those who refuse; mass shootings of protesters; physical and psychological torture, including some committed in hospitals; and the violent sexual abuse of adults and children alike.
With the Arab League's sweeping sanctions against Syria resoundingly approved this weekend, international consensus seems at last to be building against the actions of the Syrian regime. This comes not a moment too soon.
It is hard not to make comparisons to 1982 when considering the brutality of the Assad regime over the course of this year. A couple of weeks ago, I read the following tweet: "Homs 2011 = Hama 1982, but slowly, slowly."
The Hama Massacre is infamous as one of the greatest atrocities a Middle Eastern regime has perpetrated against its own people. In 1982, the Muslim Brotherhood led a revolt centered in Hama. In response, Hafez al-Assad, father of the current Syrian despot, unleashed a brutal crackdown, killing between 10,000 and 40,000 people.
Assad's forces pounded the city with artillery, reducing whole sections to rubble. They tortured an unknown number of citizens and executed people en masse. It took time for news of Hama to reach the outside world - in March of that year, a Time Magazine report still had the death toll at only 1,000, well below all later estimates. The total extent of Hama's casualties will never be known.
The people of Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen and Libya are courageous, but it must take an extra measure to fight back in Syria. In the four decades the Assads have reigned, iron-fisted repression of dissent has been the norm, with Hama the extreme example. The Syrian armed forces - more so than those in Tunisia or Egypt or Libya - are closely tied to the regime, with military leadership being drawn mostly from the Assads' minority Alawite sect, a community that makes up about 10% of the population and could have a lot to lose should Assad fall.
More than that, it takes an extraordinary amount of courage to rise up in a country where an event like the Hama Massacre is within the living memory of many citizens, where the same regime is still in power, even if a new generation of it.
But people all over Syria have risen up - and the center of the fight this time seems to have settled on Homs. In this respect, Homs parallels Hama in 1982: it is the center of resistance for its generation, and the place bearing the brunt of the regime's response.
It feels like reading the same story over and over, to the point where it's an effort to remember that it is not one story being repeated again and again, but the same brutal actions being repeated by the regime again and again: 12 killed, 30 killed, 110 killed in fighting in Homs when regime tanks shelled a neighborhood, when regime soldiers attacked protesters, when regime mortars landed in a residential street.
Of the estimated 3,500 protesters killed by the security forces so far, more than 500 have been in Homs (note: the Syrian opposition puts the number killed at 4,200 with fully 1/3 of those killings being in Homs), with many more missing - whether imprisoned or dead only the regime knows. At that rate, it would take ten years for Homs to match the lowest casualty estimates for the Hama massacre, but numbers aren't the only basis for comparison.
The point of the scorched earth policy in Hama was not the number killed or tortured or arrested. It was about making an example, about crushing the resistance, expunging it from existence so the Syrian people would know what happened to those who dared to go against the Assads.
Hafez al-Assad's son is following the example set by his father, not just in Homs but wherever protests arise. If that was somehow unclear to anyone before, it is undeniable now with the stomach-churningly comprehensive list of abuses provided in the UN report. Bashar al-Assad has simply proceeded more slowly than his father, perhaps thinking that if he doesn't talk about what he's doing and keeps his abuses on a smaller scale, then it will be easier for the world to watch and wait and vacillate, intervention harder for opponents to justify, reform still on the table. He has bet that he can kill 10, 30, even 100 people at a time, and continue to talk of 'reform' and of fighting off 'armed gangs of foreigners' and get away with it.
It is no longer an option to watch and wait. Just take the case of Homs: since May, residents of the city have been killed by artillery from tanks and mortars, machine gun fire, and snipers' bullets. Homes have been destroyed, torn apart in security raids or reduced to rubble by shelling. Security forces have made even hospitals unsafe, arresting people found seeking treatment for injuries sustained during the protests. People are taken off the streets or from their homes, some reappearing only as corpses, clear signs of torture marking their bodies.
In the last few months, there have been daily clashes in various parts of the city as citizens continue to stage protests and Assad's forces continue to greet them with violent repression. The city is under siege, surrounded by tanks and living under threat. In the first few days after signing a peace agreement at the beginning of November, Assad killed more than 60 more of his own people, with more killed every day since then.
Bashar al-Assad is truly following in his father's footsteps - committing brutal crackdowns designed to crush the rebellion and send an unmistakable message to others who are protesting, or who might protest in the future - but some things are different this time around. Unlike in 1982, members of the armed forces have been defecting and arming against the regime, and the really crucial difference is this: we know what's happening this time. In 1982, Hama was in rubble, mass graves already bulldozed over, before the world knew how far things had gone. There is nothing obscuring the abuses in 2011.
Momentum seems to be building toward putting a stop to the Assad regime's abuse of its own people, but we need to keep up the pressure. The 'Libya Model' of intervention may be neither practical nor strategically desirable in Syria, but there are other measures we can take and encourage other nations to take, first of them to stop treating Bashar al-Assad as a real partner while he is still killing his own people, and one nation after another seems to be doing just this in recent days.
The Arab League's sanctions and continued condemnation of Syrian human rights abuses represent a strong step in the right direction, and a significant leap for the Arab League itself, which will have to be involved in any Syrian peace or transition of power, as will Turkey, which shares a border with Syria and has shown a clear willingness to get involved. In addition to participating in meetings with the Arab League, Turkey has been sheltering Syrian refugees and meeting with members of the opposition.
A growing number of countries have already levied economic sanctions against Syria or tightened existing sanctions, and several have made contact with Syrian opposition members. In light of this UN report, Russia and any other hold-out nations must be persuaded to stop shielding Syria from stronger action at the United Nations.
We should continue to apply pressure in the United Nations, and offer our support to all of the regional actors in such areas as humanitarian assistance to displaced Syrians and capacity-building aid to the Syrian opposition. We should make clear to oppositions leaders that we will offer aid and support to a legitimate post-Assad government, as well as immediate assistance in organizing the resistance and preparing them to handle a transition of power in the event that the Assad regime were to fall.
More than 3,500 people have already been killed in the Syrian protests, with thousands more missing or displaced. This UN report, by collating such an extensive amount of credible evidence on the Assad regime's human rights abuses, has made it clear that the severity of the current methods of repression are a match for anything done in 1982, but there is still time to ensure that they don't reach the scale of that atrocity.
The views expressed in this article are solely those of Caitlin Fitz Gerald.
It was an extremely cold winter in Europe and the U.S. as Hafez al-Assad unleashed a brutal crackdown in Hama in February 1982.
Ronald Reagan was just one year in the White House and was busy with the Iran-Contra preoccupied and the top secret National Security Decision Directive 17 in November.
Screw Reagan , yeah he was pre occupied all right , dealing weapons
The U.S. and the USSR began negotiating intermediate-range nuclear weapon reduction in Europe.
Anwar Sadat was killed in October 1981 and Hosni Mubarak succeeded him. So the major keyplayers were busy and neglected the masacre in Hama.
Assad regime should be hold responsible for crimes against humanity. This regime has taken syria to the dark ages. Its brutality and disregard to human life is unprecidented in the history of syria. The Alawite minority is too affraid to distant themself from this dictator and his thugs who represent all the criminal elements and tactics. The whole civilized world are also held responsible for keeping a blind eyes on this killing machine. Israel should be the first country in the world to condemn this brutal dictator . Did Natanyho forget about the hollocast so soon, he is recently showing concern about loosing such type of regime that keep the mass population asleep and labeling democracy in the middle east an Islamic resurgency. Shame on what they label themself the free world.
You should have let me take control.
Good. Kill each other.
Russia has a navel base in Syria, you can forget about them supporting any sanctions. There isn't enough oil for the West to want to invade. Besides, this is an internal Syrian problem. If the Army is willing to kill it's own citizens, they have little opportunity to fight back. Since this is being done by the Alawites a mere 10% of the population, the 90% might consider attacking these Generals and politicians families! If Syrians want to be free of Assad, they should do it on their own!
I agree, but why did we go to Libya to help an internal conflict?
1982 and 2011 are very similar in that both are fueled by the Muslim Brotherhood. The difference in 2011 is that the rest of the Sunni world is now stepping behind their Muslim brothers and the west is blindly following because democracy and freedom declared as the goals.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,855 other followers