March 4th, 2012
02:08 PM ET

Will Israel strike Iran in 2012?

Will Israel strike Iran in 2012? It's a simple question, but with extremely complicated answers. Everyone you ask has a different opinion. But most people don't have sources like my guest this past weekend on GPS, Ronen Bergman. Bergman is the senior political and military analyst for Israel's most widely read daily newspaper. He joined me from Tel Aviv. Here's an excerpt of our conversation:

Fareed Zakaria: Let's start with the bottom line. You believe that it is likely that there will be an Israeli strike on Iran?

Ronen Bergman: Yes. After speaking with many of the Israeli leaders and chiefs of the intelligence and the military, I have come to the conclusion that there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran during 2012, because Iran is getting too close to what was coined by Minister of Defense Ehud Barak as the "zone of immunity."

This is this specific point on the timeline, after which Iran nuclear sites are going to become immune to an Israeli strike. According to Israeli latest intelligence assessment, Iran is something like nine months away from entering this so-called zone of immunity.

Therefore, there are many in Israel who believe that Israel should take the initiative and strike before, because sanctions do not yield the results that Israel hoped they would result in.

And the covert action that did cause some delays to the Iranian nuclear project have exceeded or exhausted their ability, and Iran is accelerating toward its ability to produce the first nuclear weapon device.

Fareed Zakaria: At least looking at it from America, another window that perhaps is closing. And I'm wondering whether that has been part of the Israeli discussion, again, with your sources at the highest levels, and that is this:

You have a window until November. Until the elections are over in the United States. It would be very difficult for an American president to criticize Israel or to do anything but support it unconditionally.

Do you think that that is a factor, that people know that, until November, you have the guaranteed support of the American president?

Ronen Bergman: Yes, Fareed, I think this is the U.S.-Israeli relation, the complex, the strategic alliance between these countries, and especially when it comes to the Iranian issue, are a central factor in the Israeli decision-making process.

And as you said, the coming U.S. election is also a factor. You can look at from one side, a guaranteed U.S. support. And you can look at from the other, because the current U.S. president, maybe the next U.S. president, President Obama, has asked Israel not to strike in Iran.

And therefore, an Israeli strike before the election, a strike that can complicate things for President Obama, might be interpreted by President Obama as sort of a defiance to his request.

Therefore, you can look at it from both sides. However, at the end of the day, the Minister of Defense Barak, told me - and he is writing the Israeli doctrine when it comes to a possible Israeli strike on Iran - he said, 'all options are on the table, indeed,' he says. 'But from our point of view, there is one option that is not on the table. This is the C option, containment.'

'Israel,' he says, 'will never contain a nuclear Iran. There is no possibility that we are going to accept such a country holding such a weapon.'

Fareed Zakaria: So take us now into the Israeli decision-making process, because one of the things we hear is that the Israeli military and intelligence apparatus is not as keen on this idea as Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Barak, that they believe that the gains, which would be probably an 18-month delay in Iran's program, are not worth the costs, which are, of course, the regional instability, the possibility of Iran retaliating. Is that true?

Ronen Bergman: There's a difference of opinion. And as you correctly said, Fareed, people in the military and the defense and the intelligence establishment, who object to strike because, they say, it would not yield the sufficient required delay of only 18 months up to three years.

And the inevitable day-after consequences, including a rain of rockets coming from Iran, from Hamas in the Gaza Strip, from Hezbollah in the north of Israel, are going to be intolerable to the Israeli public.

When I asked the Minister of Defense Barak about this, he said, 'I am supportive of difference of opinion. I support the debate.'

'But,' he says, 'when the chiefs of the military looks up, they see the prime minister and the minister of defense. When we, the prime minister, Netanyahu, and myself, look up, we see nothing but the sky. We have the responsibility,' he says, 'for the continuation of the fate of the Jewish state, for the fate of the Jewish people. Therefore, we have to make a strike.'

There are, Fareed, numerous reasons why not to take such an action, why this could inflame a new war in the Middle East. But the mindset that I get from these people, especially from the political leaders, for the political level, is that, for the first time, I hear that they feel a sense of urgency and they feel that, unless something, I would say, unpredicted - which seems impossible - like the Iranians give up their complete nuclear project - unless something like this is happening, Israel would need to make a call and would probably go for a strike.

Fareed Zakaria: What do you think Prime Minister Netanyahu is going to tell President Obama at the Oval Office on Monday?

Ronen Bergman: I would assume that the Israeli prime minister would ask President Obama to give Israel assurances on what exactly does it mean when he says that the U.S. is determined to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear state.

Is the U.S. willing to guarantee Israel that if Israel doesn't strike, the U.S., when time comes and the Iranian Supreme Leader orders his scientists to start producing the first bomb, then the U.S. would strike?

I would assume that, on that specific issue, the president of the United States would be very cautious from making promises and obliging himself to restricted military actions. And on the other hand, I assume that Prime Minister Netanyahu is going to use the same vague language as he used before, when the president will ask him to refrain from attacking.

He would say something like, 'Israel reserves itself the right to defend itself and will not promise the president not to strike or to give the U.S. a heads-up, a prior warning, before a strike takes place.'

 

Post by:
Topics: Iran • Israel • Military • Nuclear

Next entry »
soundoff (583 Responses)
  1. lg 42lk450u

    Its like you learn my mind! You appear to understand a lot approximately this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I believe that you just can do with a few percent to power the message house a bit, but other than that, that is fantastic blog. An excellent read. I will definitely be back.

    April 6, 2012 at 2:19 pm | Reply
  2. seo plugin

    Please help for I am a beginner in relation to search engine optimization plugins. Should you can present a video tutorial or step by step guides or screenshot on learn how to configure it then a lot better. Thank you..

    April 9, 2012 at 2:11 pm | Reply
  3. davood

    hi i from Iran i sure Israel never can attack Iran coz ur army just can weak pple i know if Israel attack us all iraniyan stay in front of ur government but i should say we so love peas and friendship an all thing u are head in media is lay

    May 2, 2012 at 1:51 pm | Reply
  4. P

    Down with Israel

    May 9, 2012 at 8:38 am | Reply
  5. Martinb Faissali

    Heya i’m for the primary time here. I found this board and I in finding It really helpful & it helped me out much. I'm hoping to give one thing again and help others like you helped me.

    July 2, 2012 at 1:58 pm | Reply
  6. An Asian boy

    My question is, why would the Iran president be against the Jews and why would the Jews start this war (I may be mistaken for what the Jews starting this war). Well at least Asians are not apart of this war..

    July 3, 2012 at 1:44 am | Reply
  7. Lorieh Shannaht

    I have read several excellent stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how so much effort you put to make this sort of excellent informative website.

    July 11, 2012 at 12:15 pm | Reply
  8. An Asian boy

    Ok to tell you the truth, the most race that has been targeted for extermination are Jew. Not being racist or anything but think about it, The Nazi's wanted to kill them, the Iran's wanted to kill them and even the Libyans wanted to kill them. No offence but I would seriously hate to be a Jew right now.

    July 17, 2012 at 3:13 am | Reply
  9. living house

    Magnificent post, very informative. I wonder why the opposite specialists of this sector do not realize this. You should continue your writing. I'm sure, you've a huge readers' base already!|What's Happening i'm new to this, I stumbled upon this I have discovered It positively helpful and it has aided me out loads. I'm hoping to contribute & aid different customers like its helped me. Good job.

    August 4, 2012 at 9:41 pm | Reply
  10. Jerry Hood

    Will u ever realise that the Blue Lodge of America was behind 9/11(galactic number)attacks and incorporated into its datas the so called "Olmec-Maya" calendar??Their TARGET YEAR is 2013,incorporated into the corporate US national flag and 9/11 attacks: 9 rows and 11 column of stars=20; plus 6 white and 7 red stripes=13,hence Maya Tzolkin of 20×13 and the zionist Target Year of 2013...(9×11=99;6×7=42. 99+42=141 stars in the Taurus/Bull constellation,USA represents as biblical Ephraim,described as Bull...Isn't their White House in the architectural shape of Taurus/the Bull on zodiac with Oval Office?Taurus on zodiac has also a shape of "yoke"for Oxen...Flight11 had 2 pilots+9 crew members=11 in total. Flight 175 had 2+7=9 in total.Since both flights hit the Twin Towers,it is 9/11=20;but also 99...Flight77 had 2+4=6;and Flight93 had 2+5=7 in total.Hence 20×13 and 2013...Flight11+175+77+93=356 days of Maya lunar year...U goyim,when u get educated in this??

    August 11, 2012 at 7:33 pm | Reply
  11. backyard landscape design

    Woah this weblog is fantastic i really like reading your posts. Keep up the great paintings! You recognize, a lot of people are hunting round for this info, you can help them greatly.

    September 19, 2012 at 2:42 am | Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Next entry »