April 28th, 2012
01:00 PM ET

Zakaria: Buffett Rule is bad politics for Obama

Editor's Note: Tune in Sunday at 10a.m. or 1p.m. ET for Fareed Zakaria GPS on CNN.

By Fareed Zakaria, CNN

After months of meandering, it seems President Barack Obama's re-election campaign has settled on a theme. The problem is - it's the wrong one.

The "Buffett Rule" tax on millionaires has become Obama's bumper sticker. The proposal is reasonable - but it does not deserve the attention Obama is showering on it. It raises a trivial sum of money - $47 billion over the next 10 years - during which period the federal government will spend $45 trillion. It adds one more layer to a tax code that is already the most complex and corrupt in the industrialized world.

The focus on the Buffett Rule is also bad politics in the long run for Obama. While polls might momentarily show that it works, Americans are generally aspirational, not envious. Over the years voters tend to support a government that focuses on creating opportunity rather than one that tries to reduce inequality. Bill Clinton and Tony Blair's great feat was to position themselves as pro-market, pro-growth, pro-opportunity progressives. Obama should not fritter away that asset.

Ironically, Obama has been pivoting at the very moment events in the real world are providing him with the perfect campaign issue. We are four years into the financial crisis. In the United States, the government acted speedily and massively to stimulate the economy, using monetary and fiscal measures. In Europe, by contrast, governments quickly turned toward austerity programs, cutting spending across the board to reduce budget deficits.

Well, the results are in: The U.S. economy is expected to grow 2 to 3 percent this year. The euro zone is expected to contract by 0.3 percent this year; Spain and Britain have officially entered a double-dip recession, the first time major economies have done so in 40 years. IMF projections show that even Germany's average growth rate over the next five years will be only 40 percent of America's.

President Obama started the year speaking of "an economy built to last." He should return to this theme and frame this campaign as a choice between investments on the one hand and budget cuts on the other. And he has substance behind his rhetoric.

Obama has proposed several important investment initiatives: a $476 billion infrastructure plan; a 5% hike in research and development spending; a job-training program to help dislocated workers; incentives for manufacturing; funds to expand the pool of college graduates and to increase science and engineering students. So, he should ask Americans to choose between these investments to create long-term growth versus massive budget cuts.

In the midst of the economic crisis, Warren Buffet said that his strategy was to invest in America. That's the Buffett Rule Obama should follow.

Tune in Sunday at 10a.m. or 1p.m. ET for Fareed Zakaria GPS on CNN.

Post by:
Topics: 2012 Election • Economy • Jobs • President Obama

soundoff (400 Responses)
  1. Megan Grawe

    "Zakaria: Buffett Rule is bad politics for Obama" ...especially when Buffet owes almost a billion dollars in back taxes!

    May 2, 2012 at 5:17 am | Reply
  2. Paul C. Cooper

    Fareed – You were correct; the Buffett rule will raise only a trivial amount of money relative to the huge debt. You were wrong, however, to trivialize it as just a political issue. It is not now and has never been just an issue of either money or fairness. it is a moral issue of great importance to the future of this nation. The tax systems in place now and being argued over are nothing but subsidies for the rich, many of whom are now contributing millions of dollars not only to keep these susidies in place but are demanding even more tax breaks for themselves; and they refuse to identify themselves. This is not just a money issue or a fairness issue; it is a morality issue that needs to be discussed as a serious problem for the future of democracy in this country. A nation ruled by a few with all the money is not a democracy, it is an oligarchy.

    May 2, 2012 at 4:11 pm | Reply
  3. ueaan

    A formidable share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing slightly analysis on this. And he in actual fact purchased me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I really feel strongly about it and love studying extra on this topic. If potential, as you turn into expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more particulars? It's extremely helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog put up!

    August 16, 2012 at 3:55 pm | Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.