How will PRI's win change the U.S.-Mexico relationship?
Projected winner of Mexico's presidential race Enrique Peña Nieto celebrates with supporters in Mexico City.
July 2nd, 2012
07:23 AM ET

How will PRI's win change the U.S.-Mexico relationship?

Editor's note: Andrew Selee is director of the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute, which promotes dialogue and understanding between the United States and Mexico. The views expressed in this article are solely those of Andrew Selee.

By Andrew Selee, Special to CNN

Mexico's elections have brought back the PRI, an authoritarian party that ruled Mexico for seven decades. This possibility had worried many observers and politicians in the United States, and yet, surprisingly, it will make little difference for the U.S.-Mexico relationship. This is largely a tribute to how deeply interdependent the two countries are today, as well as the ways in which Mexican society has evolved over the past two decades.

The PRI has been known in the past for its anti-American rhetoric and distrust of the United States. However, circumstances over the past 20 years have completely changed the relationship between the two countries. Mexico has developed a vibrant export-oriented economy that is growing at a respectable 3-4% a year. Its major destination for exports is, of course, the United States.

Related: Fareed Zakaria on why Mexico is on the rise

At the same time, Mexico's expanding economy has allowed it to become the second destination for U.S. exports. States ranging from Texas to Nebraska, Michigan, Tennessee and New Hampshire depend heavily on the trading relationship with Mexico. Indeed, the growing Mexican economy is helping to fuel the expansion of jobs in these states in the midst of an economic crisis at home. Policymakers in both countries have a vested interest in managing these economic ties responsibly, and a new administration in Mexico is sure to make this a priority.

There have also been suspicions that the PRI would renew its old ways in dealing with drug traffickers and jettison the growing security cooperation relationship with the United States. This also seems unlikely to happen, and the new government will almost certainly want to deepen cooperation against drug traffickers. In the past, PRI governments "managed" the traffickers to keep them under control, and scandals and allegations of relationships with cartels hound some former and current state PRI governors.

However, the new government in Mexico has enormous incentives to tackle the violence that has beset parts of the country, and it cannot do that without extensive intelligence sharing, equipment and training from the U.S. government. We are likely to see cooperation against trafficking organizations deepen in the coming years as the new government tries to get control of areas in the north and along the coasts where criminal groups have established themselves. The main criminal groups are now too big to be dealt with through negotiations and deals as the PRI did in the 1980s and 90s. Inevitably, the new government will have to continue outgoing President Felipe Calderon's policy of confronting these groups, although it may find ways of prioritizing the protection of civilians in the process.

Suspicions will, nonetheless, remain in the United States, as in much of Mexican society, about the PRI's honesty and transparency. A party that ruled through corrupt bargains in the past is unlikely to have been born again overnight. Indeed, the allegations of several creative means for vote buying by the PRI during this election worries many that the old ways of doing business are alive and well still in 2012. But even here there is hope.

What has changed is not the PRI but Mexican society and the challenges it faces. Mexicans today have become used to a flourishing democracy with competitive elections, freedom of the press, and greater (if still imperfect) transparency in governance. Mexicans expect politicians to be accountable, police to do their jobs well and courts to be independent. They are often disappointed, to be sure, but their expectations have changed dramatically since the late 1990s when Mexico's democratic process began. The PRI is, in the end, a party that wants legitimacy and to show that it can govern in a democratic era. The new government is almost certain to continue reforms to the courts, police and public services as a way of winning public trust.

The United States has a substantial interest in seeing Mexico's democracy flourish, its security situation improve and its economy grow. Making sure that we have a secure and prosperous neighbor next door, with solid democratic institutions, will provide a buffer in an often hostile world and produce enormous tangible benefits for U.S. workers who depend on exports to Mexico. Deepening our partnership with Mexico is key to the future of U.S. security and prosperity. There will be legitimate doubts about the new government in Mexico, but there will be even more pressing reasons to move forward in strengthening the relationship with our neighbor next door.

– The views expressed in this article are solely those of Andrew Selee.

Topics: Elections • Mexico • Politics

soundoff (198 Responses)
  1. Bribarian


    July 3, 2012 at 4:03 pm | Reply
  2. Jack

    Hello folks. Everyone is always welcome to visit –

    July 5, 2012 at 11:56 pm | Reply
  3. Adriana Mier

    Come on!!!!! Who wrote this article is a fantasy dreamer.Party PRI and its members WILL NEVER CHANGE.Did you get it? Will never change.Just ask and get informed about the "State election".Ask how PRI "bought" the dignity and freedom of millions people by giving them,scholarships,concret,gifts etc to vote PRI. My state ,YUCATAN,is a living proof of what i´m saying.Look at this equality: PRI=CORRUPTION. The "NEW PRI" as they call themselves just have new and younger faces;that´s it but they are like their predecessors.So please stop dreaming and return to reality. 😦

    July 8, 2012 at 10:59 am | Reply
  4. Jimbo Jobs

    Calling Mexico an export-oriented society is like saying the designers of the atomic bomb are experts in the field of urban demolition.

    December 4, 2012 at 9:15 am | Reply
  5. AlbertCrync

    Это позволяет сберечь время (не надо выдергивать маяки, позже заштукатуривать штробы от их) и понизить расход штукатурки (с маячками малый слой будет 6 мм даже в ровненьком месте) вот здесь.

    December 6, 2017 at 4:09 am | Reply
1 2 3 4

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.