Why U.S. cities are going bankrupt
July 20th, 2012
11:45 AM ET

Why U.S. cities are going bankrupt

By Fareed Zakaria

I was struck last week to hear that the city of San Bernardino, California is declaring bankruptcy. It follows similar moves in the past month by Mammoth Lakes and Stockton, also in California. Before them it was Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Jefferson County, Alabama, Central Falls, Rhode Island – the list continues.

What in the world is going on? Companies go bankrupt all the time – but what happens when a city goes under?

In reality, the two aren’t that different. Companies file for what’s known as “Chapter 11” – a provision which enables them to renegotiate deals, to downsize, to fire people. But filing Chapter 11 also gives them the option of liquidating – or breaking up. That would be essentially impossible for a city – it also happens to be unconstitutional. So cities go for “Chapter 9,” which covers municipalities: that’s cities, but also towns, villages, taxing districts and utilities.

641 cases of municipal bankruptcy have been filed since Chapter 9 was created. Most have been smaller cases involving utilities. But when an entire city goes bankrupt, things are much more complicated. It affects public sector jobs and vital services like fire and police departments.

Now, naturally, we assume all bankruptcies are a bad thing. They're humiliating, they impact business, they’re difficult to recover from. The situation is far from ideal. But it’s actually not without its benefits.

Take for example San Bernardino. It was running a $45 million deficit (on a $130 million budget.) But its creditors – workers and retirees – were unwilling to help out. The best the unions were able to do was to offer what they thought was a major concession: allowing newly-hired public safety workers to retire with 90 percent of their salary at the age of 55 – instead of 50, which had been the earlier deal!

That won't work in a chapter 9 bankruptcy. An independent judge brings all parties to a table where an agreement has to be reached – no matter how painful. And, we need some of those painful decisions – not just at the federal level, but at local and state levels as well. At its heart, the bankruptcies you keep hearing about these days aren’t about taxes being too low or spending on city services being too high – they're about pensions.

California's pension-related costs rose 20-fold in the decade since 1999. This frightening trend is true almost everywhere in America. And it’s simply not sustainable. A recent Pew research survey found that the gap between state assets and their obligations for public sector retirement benefits is $1.38 trillion. It rose by 9 percent in 2010 alone – and it will likely keep rising until these obligations are renegotiated.

The truth is America is sacrificing its future to pay for its past. To keep up with burgeoning pensions, states and cities are slashing services. It's also feeding into the unemployment problem. State and local governments have 445,000 fewer workers today than in 2007. Even if you exclude teachers from that number, we have 231,000 fewer workers.

For decades now, local governments have doled out patronage by increasing pension benefits – these costs impact the budget years later, when the officials who gave the benefits are safely retired themselves. We're now having to reckon with those choices.

I'm not saying bankruptcies are a good thing. But they are a mechanism that allows us to admit an emergency and renegotiate the deals that are, well, bankrupting the country.

Watch "Fareed Zakaria GPS" Sunday at 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. ET

soundoff (391 Responses)
  1. Steve

    This all started happening with Ws tax cuts to the rich. He simply cut too far. He took the top 1% tax rate to 35%. That rate reduced revenues down to the lowest levels since 1960. So money that had been going to city and state levels was gone. The city of Harrisberg PA is now selling off 8000 pieces of Civil War antiques to stay a float. Tahoe City in California had young girls standing in the mdidle of main street collecting donations for the 4th of July's fire work show. This has nothing to do with gov pensions getting to big. I'm a state worker. I'll be working until I'm 62 to collect 78% of my pay (I'll have worked 32 yrs.) State workers may have a better then average retirement formula but remember, we get paid less then the public sector. The state retirement system (PERS) makes 8% on a huge pile of money. It's freaking bigger then social security. It has enough money to pay off his current and future penions. Cities are going broke because of reduction in tax revenues. You can blame W.

    July 8, 2013 at 5:23 pm | Reply
    • John Canadian Doe

      I heard that you live in America... then why would you need a retirement fund anyway?
      America is about the franchise business model which offers no retirement fund anyway.

      America is about the freedom to hang out at real american stores like Wal-Mart
      which values low prices, disposable items of bad to average quality and and lower wages.

      America is about the freedom to go to Mc Donald's which offers low prices, food that makes you sick (fat) and low wages...

      and no employer funded retirement benefits..

      March 15, 2015 at 3:49 am | Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,029 other followers