How to tap our solar potential
October 20th, 2012
10:36 PM ET

How to tap our solar potential

Watch the latest "Fareed Zakaria GPS" special, ‘Global Lessons: The Road Map for Powering America,’ this Sunday at 8 p.m. Eastern and Pacific.

By Michael Graetzel, Special to CNN

Editor’s note: Michael Graetzel is a professor at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, where he directs the Laboratory of Photonics and Interfaces. He has consulted for technology firm G24i. The views expressed are his own.

For two centuries, we have been burning billions of years of photosynthetic residue, better known as fossil fuel, to power our factories, homes, vehicles and cities. But we may not need to do this much longer – solar resources are great enough for all of us. Indeed, it may surprise many to learn that the amount of solar energy striking the earth in one hour is equal to the total energy consumed by all of humanity in a whole year. Learning to capture more of this resource could yield huge dividends for humanity.

Here at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in Switzerland we have developed a solar cell technology that takes its cue from photosynthesis: dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs). By separating the components for light absorption (which determines the cell’s color) and the transportation of electrical current, this technology is remarkably similar to natural photosynthesis and provides unique benefits for integrating solar cells into everyday life. The color tunability and transparency of the cells, as well as an enhanced efficiency in indoor light – power conversion efficiencies can reach over 12 percent at full sunlight intensity and more than 25 percent for interior lighting – afford DSCs the opportunity to extend solar power generation seamlessly and conveniently into our office buildings and living rooms.

The start-up company G24i, meanwhile, has already licensed this technology for marketing commercial products and entered into partnership with Logitech and Texas Instruments to create light-powered computer and iPad peripherals, as well as solar powered blinds and shades. (G24i has produced a short video that gives some technical insight this technology).

Standby power consumption from home appliances accounts for almost 10 percent of the power consumption in an average U.S. residence, but many of these devices contain a design element that could be replaced with a solar cell, such as the frame around a TV set or the plastic body of a TV remote. As a result, lightweight flexible solar cell technology is a potential game changer for many power consumers around the world.

But solar energy storage presents a major challenge for the burgeoning solar industry. Storing the sun’s energy – packets of photons – in the form of chemical bonds is one way to accomplish this task. Nature stores solar energy by combining CO2 and water through photosynthesis to produce plant matter and the oxygen we breathe. We hope to do something similar: produce hydrogen and other fuels from water and CO2. This starts by splitting water with the power of the sun, just the way plants do. Once hydrogen is liberated from the oxygen bond in water (2H2O à 2H2 + O2), it can be used directly in a hydrogen fuel cell, burned in BMW’s hydrogen combustion engine, or used to chemically reduce the greenhouse gas CO2.

The reduction of CO2 to form liquid fuels such as methanol, which can be burned like ethanol in a flex-fuel engine, provides a way to mitigate the ongoing release of CO2 into our atmosphere while newer, greener technologies make it to market. Note here how sustainable and remediating this cycle could be: solar energy is used to convert greenhouse gas into fuel while producing oxygen, akin to the overall process accomplished by natural photosynthesis.

Another method, the photoelectrochemical (PEC) approach, can produce hydrogen or oxygen directly on the surface of a light harvesting material. In our own laboratories, we investigate using iron oxide (rust) and copper oxide to accomplish this task. These two materials can be produced at very low cost and could be scaled up to the quantities necessary for converting huge amounts of solar energy into stored chemical energy. Additionally, PEC technology can be integrated synergistically with DSC technology to form a “tandem” setup. With this approach, we have recently demonstrated that it is possible to produce hydrogen and oxygen from water, using only cheap, earth-abundant materials.

In my vision of the future, humanity has tapped the ultimate resource that is our sun, reliably harvesting, transferring and storing its energy to provide clean and sustainable power. I can see a day when the sun powers our electronics, our cars, our homes, our cities – our whole planet. We have been working to realize this goal for more than two decades, and I believe the technology is finally coming into maturity. Solar is not a thing of the future; it is ready and waiting for us to take advantage of right now.

Governments and companies that embrace this idea early will not only help the planet, but they may also win out in the long run economically. After all, fossil fuels will burn out long before the sun ever does.

Post by:
Topics: Energy • Environment

soundoff (19 Responses)
  1. ✠ RZ ✠

    According to SOME, this concept is poorly researched, needs to be googled for verification, and is only conceivable by those with "peanut shell" sized brains that are partially filled. Evidently, this post clearly indicates that SOME are very sadly mistaken, should really be ashamed of themselves, and are desperately in need of a few lessons in congeniality.

    Thanks very much Msr. Graetzel and Mr. Miks (well done !)

    October 21, 2012 at 12:19 am | Reply
  2. contrast in obama.... 2008 v 2012

    In 2008, obama ran on healing, bringing together, unfiying...

    in 2012, he has divided american along every conceivable demograhic.

    rich v poor
    women v men
    young v old
    muslims v "intolerance"
    black v white
    legals v illegals
    black harvard professor v white("racist") boston cop
    trayvon("looks like he could be my son") v white justice
    obamacare v throw grandma off the cliff
    bogus alternative energy v rich bad oil companies
    ground zero mosque v "intolerance"
    I killed bin laden v "republicans love war"

    in short, obama has DELIBERATELY chosen to divide americans along every line imaginable....he has chosen to make people agnry at one another....

    you tell me, how is that "presidential"? How is that a unifier? a bridge builder? The TRUTH is, he has completely LIED about what he said he was going to be when he duped everyone in 2008.

    Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

    October 21, 2012 at 3:25 pm | Reply
  3. JAL

    Great show this week!

    October 21, 2012 at 4:54 pm | Reply
    • solar

      i agree.

      October 21, 2012 at 11:15 pm | Reply
    • ✠ RZ ✠

      I thought the show was pretty good, but a little self centered. It certainly didn't even mention a few other items like geothermal power and advancements in hydrogen power, and it also seemed a little too one sided in glorifying natural gas extraction by the frac method. No denying the frac process works quite well.....but the opportunity costs in both the short and long term need serious review.

      October 22, 2012 at 12:26 am | Reply
  4. memoe

    The ghost loads on our home runs about $13 per month. I see where the cost of these solar cells are running $8.00+per watt. That would mean an investment return of over 40yrs. Why would anyone purchase equipment that has no payback?

    October 21, 2012 at 6:45 pm | Reply
    • Peter

      Not sure where you got your information regarding cost of solar photovoltaics. Today's cost in USA is well below $3.00 per watt fully installed and connected. And remember once the initial investment has been paid back through savings, every kWh produced is FREE!

      October 21, 2012 at 9:19 pm | Reply
      • memoe

        At $3/00 per watt that's still 10+ years before any payback A 10kw system would still cost around $30,000 us dollars. Still not very impressed with those numbers.

        November 4, 2012 at 6:41 pm |
  5. namarchetti

    It is good to CNN covering the clean energy topic. To learn more about how it is actually playing out in daily life, along with other green technology topics, check out EarthTechling (http://www.earthtechling.com). We cover these topics from a consumer perspective.

    October 21, 2012 at 8:22 pm | Reply
  6. solar

    i wonder if the firemen like those solar panels on the roof? seems like they would say no to that.

    October 21, 2012 at 11:14 pm | Reply
  7. solar

    some comments don't show up.

    October 21, 2012 at 11:20 pm | Reply
  8. solar

    maybe we aren't allowed to talk about n u c l e a r.

    October 21, 2012 at 11:20 pm | Reply
  9. solar

    i wonder if they can reconcile the statement made in The C r u d e A w a k e n i n g when they said that there isn't enough raw materials to take n u c l e a r out much more than 50 years? so why would people invest in that?

    October 21, 2012 at 11:23 pm | Reply
  10. Marvin

    Quote "power conversion efficiencies can reach over 12 percent at full sunlight intensity"
    Yawn.
    Top-of-the-line efficiencies are up to 45 percent,
    Off-the-shelf units already deliver 20-22 percent,
    even the bargain bin junkers are good for 12 percent.

    So why brag about a 12 percenter?

    October 22, 2012 at 8:21 am | Reply
  11. Deutsche Bier

    One clever way for the US to increase the use of solar energy is to make solar energy more expensive by imposing high taxes on China made solar panels to make them more expensive for the Americans, never mind if the China made solar panels are made from a lot of American made components.

    October 22, 2012 at 10:30 am | Reply
  12. Salman Ata

    How can hydrogen be separated from Oxygen in H2O Bond from Solar Energy ?
    It requires a huge amount to split both and use Hydrogen as a gas

    October 25, 2012 at 2:48 pm | Reply
  13. Alishia Booe

    There are criticisms of geothermal energy tapping which prevent its being implemented on the large scale which it should be. Critics say that study and research to find a resourceful area is too costly and takes up too much time. Then there is more great expense needed to build a geothermal power plant, and there is no promise of the plant turning a profit. Some geothermal sites, once tapped, might be found to not produce a large enough amount of steam for the power plant to be viable or reliable. And we hear from the environmentalists who worry that bringing up magma can bring up potentially harmful materials along with it."

    Remember to look over our new web site
    <http://foodsupplementcenter.com/

    May 8, 2013 at 12:27 am | Reply
  14. Winford Guilbert

    Because pure hydrogen does not occur naturally, it takes energy to manufacture it. There are different ways to manufacture it, such as, electrolysis and steam-methane reforming process. In electrolysis, electricity is run through water to separate the hydrogen and oxygen atoms. This method can be used by using wind, solar, geothermal, hydro, fossil fuels, biomass, and many other resources.*'*^

    http://www.healthmedicine101.comHave a look at all of the most popular content at our blog site

    May 19, 2013 at 3:31 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.