By Vikram Nehru, Special to CNN
Vikram Nehru is a senior associate and Bakrie Chair in Southeast Asian Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The views expressed are his own.
President Obama will take time off over the next few days from tough negotiations with the Republicans over the fiscal cliff and will travel to Thailand, Myanmar, and Cambodia – his first foreign foray since winning reelection. The trip will also be the first by an incumbent U.S. president to Myanmar and Cambodia.
The visit is the culmination of painstaking preparatory work by his senior officials – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, and U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk – who have assiduously put flesh on the bones of Obama’s rebalancing strategy toward Asia. Obama’s trip could add substantially by providing the strategic framework that combines the different strands of work related to trade, investment, aid, security, governance, diplomacy, and culture. He could do this by offering Southeast Asia the vision of a comprehensive partnership that builds on these initiatives and the foundational values and interests common between the region and the United States.
From a strategic perspective, Obama couldn’t have chosen a better set of destinations for his first post-election foreign trip. Asia, after all, has been the focus of Obama’s foreign policy “rebalancing,” which recognizes the dynamism of the region and its central importance to America’s long-term strategic interests.
This trip will send an early and strong signal that, notwithstanding critical issues at home, America’s strategic interests in Asia are being given priority attention by none other than the president himself. Moreover, after what is sure to be a tense week of negotiations on tax and expenditure policy at the White House and on Capitol Hill, the trip will spotlight a foreign policy issue on which there is strong bipartisan support in Washington – the restoration of democracy and human rights in Myanmar.
On the way to Myanmar, the president will stop in Bangkok, where he will formalize Secretary Panetta’s efforts to reinvigorate the U.S.-Thai military alliance and applaud Thailand’s intention to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which will give a welcome boost to the American-supported free trade initiative in the Asia-Pacific. And by attending his second East Asia Summit in Cambodia, he will underline America’s determination to be a constructive part of the conversation in Asia on the key issues that confront the region.
The trip presents an opportunity to correct two misperceptions about the Obama administration’s rebalancing toward Asia.
The first is the overwhelming and unfortunate impression that the rebalancing is almost exclusively to do with an increased U.S. military presence in the region, especially in light of rising tensions in the South China Sea. Obama’s trip should convey a new and different message that will help restore the other dimensions of U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia to their proper place, notably the promotion of trade, investment, good governance, human rights, disaster relief, education, technology cooperation, and so on.
The second is that the whole of the rebalancing policy appears to be less than the sum of its parts. Obama’s trip should be the start of a new narrative of how the recent initiatives on trade, security, and diplomacy fit together and the strategic objectives they eventually hope to achieve.
To do this, Obama should offer Southeast Asia the vision of a comprehensive partnership with the United States. This would provide a framework that binds together its myriad components into one cohesive whole and embodies the principle of equality and mutual respect.
To be sure, this is not a new concept. The United States already has a comprehensive partnership with a Southeast Asian country – Indonesia – that covers three broad dimensions: economy and development; political and security; and socio-cultural (which includes education, science and technology, environmental protection, democracy promotion, among others).
These areas are being developed through six joint U.S.-Indonesian working groups that have their progress reviewed periodically by the U.S. secretary of state and the Indonesian foreign minister. By working together on a broad range of topics of mutual interest and importance, both sides are building cooperative structures that will deepen understanding and advance shared programs.
Given the diversity of countries in Southeast Asia, developing a comprehensive partnership with the entire Southeast Asian region will prove difficult. Instead, the approach adopted by the U.S.-Indonesia comprehensive partnership is a model that could be advanced on a bilateral basis with other countries in the region.
Certainly, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, and Vietnam would be excellent candidates. The areas for partnership and joint development in each case would need to be identified separately and will likely be very different.
Over time, however, as these partnerships develop, they will undoubtedly display common features that have the potential of being brought together gradually across the entire Southeast Asian region.
President Obama’s Southeast Asia trip will reinforce the importance the United States attaches to a strong relationship with Asia. But rather than seeing Thailand, Myanmar, and Cambodia as three different stops requiring three different talking points, the U.S. administration has an opportunity to present a common vision of partnership to Southeast Asia that will resonate in all three countries and throughout the region. Obama should grab it.
Whatever the clever words used mean... China is a country of billions of people who work very hard to get a bite to eat at home (mind you "not bring home the bacon"). In the last decades they have been barred by quotas in exporting their main yields. The Global Crises started a few years after the sanctions were lifted. The world was not ready for the output of the hungry Chinese people. 3 or so billion cheap producing people unbalanced the world's economy. As it did back in 1974-ish.
I cannot see a sollution for this. It is just like the out-pour or flood of a dammed body of water. You just have to wait it out untill it mingles with the main body. And well be creative in inventing innovations in keeping your head above water level.
Obama's national security adviser Tom Donilon said last week that the President believed that the US was "underweighted" in some regions and "overweighed" in others, like the Middle East. This unflattering phrase revealed that Obama saw the Pacific region be of a greater strategic value to America than other parts of the world.
I remember this trip I'm glad to see it was done. Obama’s trip did add substantially by providing the strategic framework that combines the different strands of work related to trade, investment, aid, security, governance, diplomacy, and culture. We need to keep alliances like this up.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,862 other followers