December 20th, 2012
03:30 PM ET

Boko Haram terror designation plan misses point

By Shobana Shankar, Special to CNN

Editor’s note: Shobana Shankar is a visiting assistant professor in the History Department of Georgetown University. She is finalizing a book, ‘Who Shall Enter Paradise? Christian Missions and the Politics of Difference in Muslim Northern Nigeria.’ The views expressed are her own.

The violent Islamist group Boko Haram has escalated attacks throughout Northern Nigeria since last year, murdering civilians and destroying government and private property. Understandably concerned by news reports and appeals from the expatriate community, members of the U.S. Congress have proposed designating Boko Haram a foreign terrorist organization (FTO), a label that would trigger actions affecting business and aid that could hurt many Nigerians. It would also exacerbate religious tensions that Boko Haram itself has fomented, which all who seek peace in Nigeria must steadfastly contest if its people are to rid themselves of violence and fear.

Capitol Hill certainly has cause for concern. Attacks on Christian churches have intensified in the last six months, yet leading traditional Muslim leaders have not publicly condemned Boko Haram since May of this year, when the Sultan of Sokoto – one of Nigeria's most prominent Muslim leaders – denounced the group. No Muslim authority has emerged to clearly champion the rights of both Muslims and Christians to live together peacefully in Northern Nigeria. A great responsibility rests on the shoulders of Muslim leaders to speak out against Boko Haram at this critical moment.
Christianity in Muslim areas is historically complex. Southern Christians began to settle in Muslim towns over a hundred years ago. Hausa-speaking Christians, belonging to ethnic minority communities, have lived peacefully under Muslim rulers. A small number of Muslims have even converted to Christianity, and traditional Muslim rulers – emirs, their councilors – have historically had religiously mixed subjects.

During the British colonial era, Muslim rulers played key roles as facilitators of interreligious cooperation. In 1937, the emirs of Kano, Katsina, and Bauchi, along with the Sultan of Sokoto, negotiated agreements with North American Christian missionaries to cooperatively undertake a massive leprosy control campaign. To be sure, white missionaries and Muslim elites forged alliances out of a shared paternalism and arrangements of mutual benefit.

After riots broke out in Kano in 1953, ostensibly over North-South disputes regarding constitutional negotiations, the government investigation concluded that religion was not a catalyst for the violence. Notably, it found that religion did not prevent Muslims and Christians from sheltering one another. Mutual assistance has occurred in the midst of Boko Haram’s bloody assaults, but religious separatism has grown since the 1960s. Unlike Muslim nationalists of that era, like Sir Ahmadu Bello, prominent Muslim leaders today have not offered sufficient shelter, even symbolically, to Christians in the North today.

Northern Nigeria's ancien regime can and should use its authority to press for peace. Today's interfaith efforts in Nigeria are commendable but do not go far enough if Christian and Muslim leaders only take care of their own. Muslim leaders should embrace Christians over Muslim extremists now. Christian leaders in Plateau State should also denounce vigilantes who attack Muslims, but they have no influence over Boko Haram, which has captured a monopoly on violence in parts of the country. Most of all, Muslim leaders must accept Christians as genuine Northerners, worthy of their affection, and protection.

Although Washington is a long way from Abuja and Kano, actions on Capitol Hill could further inflame tensions and isolate some of the least developed regions of Nigeria from national and international development. The House and Senate narrowly avoided a crisis this week when the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 wisely abandoned provisions that would have pressured the State Department to designate Boko Haram an FTO. But efforts to designate Boko Haram an FTO are likely to resume in 2013. FTO designation would sideline the U.S. government and American experts and scholars from contributing to efforts towards disarmament and peace. The most effective tools to defeat militant violence and prevent any escalation in northern Nigeria are diplomacy and development that involves Muslim-Christian cooperation.

Rather than focus on a short-sighted FTO designation, the U.S. should actively seek ways to support productive dialogue with and among traditional rulers and Northern Nigerian officials at the state level. International Muslim bodies, such as the Organization of the Islamic Conference, should do the same.

Most importantly, Muslim moderates must restore their credibility wherever non-Muslim neighbors are under attack, whether in Nigeria, Kenya, or Pakistan. If they refuse to act, history will not look kindly on their silence.

Post by:
Topics: Nigeria

soundoff (15 Responses)
  1. zaeed

    boko haram are great cult kidnapping and killing british and american people thats gods work they are cleansing the earth of evil.

    December 20, 2012 at 8:25 pm | Reply
    • Towel Head Detection System

      Warning!!!!!!!...............Warning!!!!!!!!!!!!...............Warning!!!!!!!!!!!!! Towel Head detected!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      December 21, 2012 at 9:10 am | Reply
      • Racist Alert

        The above comment/er is a racist.

        February 20, 2013 at 9:54 am |
  2. 100 % ETHIO

    We know Boko haram and some others are terrorist groups, who are promised to destroyed Christians.

    However, do not be fooled by Jewish who are flexing their muscles and accessing all Christian privacies. Jewish are sticking each other for their own advantage and to destroy Christians, whenever they got chances.


    December 21, 2012 at 8:24 am | Reply
  3. Hahahahahahaa

    Towel Heads HAVE no point!!!!!! They just like to kill in the name of religion!!!! Hahahahahahahahaha

    December 21, 2012 at 9:09 am | Reply
    • Racist Alert

      The above comment/er is a racist.

      February 20, 2013 at 9:55 am | Reply
  4. Richard

    Has the author been to Nigeria? Boko Haram is hand in glove with the politicians in northern Nigeria, and an FTO designation will put an immediate wedge between the two groups. With FTO, anyone with a financial link to Boko Haram will have their bank accounts frozen. And if there's one thing politicians in Nigeria love, it's their money. The politicians will choose their money over Boko Haram and the group will lose all their top cover.

    Does Shanker really think sitting around and singing kumbaya will stop Boko Haram? What a twerp.

    December 21, 2012 at 3:23 pm | Reply
    • Jayanta

      Richard, your criticism of the author Shankar is spot on. Unfortunately India produces these liberal idiot academics by the thousands. I know because I am Indian myself!

      December 25, 2012 at 11:43 pm | Reply
  5. wakeupcall

    no wonder no one gets along lets be nice isnt in their vocabulary, no offence just fact , who taught people wrong ideas ,and that they would hate vergins in heaven, that is only a lie to get you to do what they want the shame of stupid beleifs it cause bad to continue wake up to reallity no virgins in heaven , green men ,aleins green men are not a danger no one taught what love is to these people . Its a shame really how people are treated.

    December 21, 2012 at 4:58 pm | Reply
  6. wakeupcall

    the world is still here time to learn what love is and kindness not about flying green socks greed etc life is not going away only alot of misinformation and crazy ideas about religion etc no offence get over hate please

    December 21, 2012 at 5:20 pm | Reply
  7. j. von hettlingen

    Boko Haram is led by Abubakar Shekau, said to be a fearless loner, a complex, paradoxical man – part intellectual, part gangster. He is also Nigeria's most wanted man and has been designated a terrorist by the US.
    The group has a highly decentralised structure – the unifying force is ideology.
    Shekau does not communicate directly with the group's foot soldiers, saying he wields his power through a few select cell leaders, but even then contact is minimal. It looks as if he had learned from Osama bin Laden.

    December 23, 2012 at 8:16 am | Reply
    • Jayanta

      Hettlingen, your "part" praise of Shekau is foolish. Fearless? As in sending followers to kill innocents in churches. "part intellectua"? Any fool can string together some nonsense and claim to be an intellectual.

      December 25, 2012 at 11:46 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.