U.S. needs significant military presence in Afghanistan
January 11th, 2013
10:09 AM ET

U.S. needs significant military presence in Afghanistan

By Ahmad Majidyar, Special to CNN

Editor’s note: Ahmad Majidyar is a senior research associate at the American Enterprise Institute, focusing on Afghanistan and Pakistan. The views expressed are the author’s own.

President Barack Obama will meet Afghan President Hamid Karzai today at the White House to assess the progress of the war and discuss America’s future role in Afghanistan. The two leaders are expected to talk about a wide range of issues, particularly concerning security transition to the Afghan lead, reconciliation with the Taliban, and Afghanistan’s presidential elections slated for April 2014. At the top of the meeting agenda, however, will be a discussion over the nature, scope and obligations of a residual U.S. military footprint in Afghanistan after the foreign combat mission there ends next year. Three key issues are likely to be contentious in the talks: legal immunity for U.S. soldiers, transfer of detention facilities to the Afghan government, and Kabul’s request for advanced military equipment.

The immunity issue, which derailed negotiations for a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) between the U.S. and Iraq in late 2011, will be the most sensitive one. A postwar U.S. military presence in Afghanistan is inconceivable unless American soldiers are granted protection from local prosecution. Nonetheless, while Karzai might use the question of immunity as leverage to extract concessions from the White House, the issue is unlikely to be a deal breaker this time. Kabul will be more flexible than Baghdad in negotiating a SOFA with Washington because, unlike oil-rich Iraq, Afghanistan’s economy is almost entirely dependent on foreign aid. Moreover, the Afghan government requires U.S. and NATO help to fund, train, and equip its 350,000 security personnel for many years beyond 2014.

Another sticking point could be Karzai’s demand for transfer of all detainees held by the U.S. military at a facility in Bagram Air Base near Kabul. The U.S. has already handed over more than 3,000 terrorism suspects to the Afghan government since the two sides signed an agreement last March, but Karzai has recently accused U.S. forces of breaching the accord by still keeping some prisoners under custody. Washington believes the Afghans are not yet ready to take over the control of all prisoners, especially ones believed to be too dangerous or affiliated with al Qaeda.

The Afghan leader may also overplay his hand. He is said to be carrying with him an expensive shopping list to the White House, including requests for advanced weaponry to the Afghan Army, such as fighter jets, surveillance equipment and armored tanks. Pentagon officials have previously rejected such demands, arguing Afghanistan cannot afford, operate and sustain them.

More from GPS: Obama should be honest with Karzai

Leaked reports suggest the White House is considering cutting troop numbers by 20,000 to 30,000 this year and keeping as few as 2,500 troops in Afghanistan after 2014, despite requests by military commanders in the field to maintain most of the remaining 68,000 U.S. troops through the next two fighting seasons and a larger post-2014 presence. Ben Rhodes, White House deputy national security adviser, said Tuesday that a complete pullout by the end of next year is also an option. But while a steep drawdown and keeping a small or no residual force may be politically expedient for the Obama administration, it is a recipe for failure in Afghanistan.

First, without a significant military presence after 2014, Washington risks undoing the gains of the past decade and allowing al Qaeda and the Taliban to reconstitute in parts of Afghanistan. Terrorist groups have already returned to some Afghan areas vacated by withdrawing foreign troops. Residents of eastern Nuristan Province, for example, say about 70 percent of the province is under the de facto rule of the Taliban and foreign militant groups, including al Qaeda and Lashkar-e Taiba (LeT). More remote areas could fall into terrorists’ control if U.S. forces leave precipitously.

Second, a hasty pullout undermines the training and strengthening of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF). Over the past three years, the ANSF has made remarkable progress in size and quality and is now responsible for security of 75 percent of Afghanistan’s population. But it still remains heavily reliant on the coalition for enablers, such as logistics, air power, medevac, reconnaissance, route-clear equipment and intelligence. A Pentagon study released last month rated only one of 23 Afghan Army brigades as independent. Without coalition’s help, the ANSF’s operational capabilities will decline dramatically. NATO and other allied nations would also not provide sufficient numbers of advisors and mentors for the ANSF if they perceive ambivalence from Washington.

Third, without a post-2014 military presence, the CIA-led drone strikes into Pakistan’s tribal regions will most likely cease. With Washington-Islamabad ties at their nadir, the U.S. drone campaign against al Qaeda and its affiliates in South and North Waziristan is now entirely dependent on bases in Afghanistan. The Navy Seal helicopters tasked with killing bin Laden flew from a base in eastern Afghan city of Jalalabad.

Fourth, a significant post-2014 military presence is needed to send a clear message to friends and enemies in the region that the United States and its allies are not abandoning Afghanistan. The Taliban will not have an incentive to enter meaningful peace talks if they see allied forces on the run. With the ANSF not yet ready to defend against a Taliban return, warlords and minority ethnic leaders would decide to take things on their own hands. Many local strongmen have already begun rearming their militias in preparation for a potential civil war.

The United States has two vital interests in the AfPak region: preventing al Qaeda and its affiliates from reconstituting in Afghanistan and ensuring that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons do not fall into terrorists’ hands. These two objectives cannot be guaranteed without a significant military presence in Afghanistan beyond 2014.

Post by:
Topics: Afghanistan

soundoff (77 Responses)
  1. lance

    u.s. needs to pull out as fast as possible and stay out of these blood and money draining wars fix our economy our national debt our unemployment our educational system ours borders etc. etc.......................

    January 24, 2013 at 4:31 pm | Reply
  2. obsthetimes

    Get america out of there now!
    Absolute rubbish. The only way to keep the taliban at bay is to keep US troops there forever. Afgan soliders will never be able to do the job.
    Get the troops back today!

    February 11, 2013 at 7:25 pm | Reply
  3. Pure Leverage | Pure Leverage Review

    Great article. I am going through some of these issues as well..

    April 14, 2013 at 4:49 pm | Reply
  4. Pure Leverage | Pure Leverage Review

    Hey there! I just want to give you a huge thumbs up for your excellent info you've got here on this post. I will be coming back to your web site for more soon.

    April 17, 2013 at 4:55 am | Reply
  5. Pure Leverage | Pure Leverage Review

    When I initially commented I appear to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on every time a comment is added I recieve 4 emails with the exact same comment. Perhaps there is a means you are able to remove me from that service? Kudos!

    April 19, 2013 at 4:52 am | Reply
  6. Pure Leverage | Pure Leverage Review

    Having read this I thought it was very informative. I appreciate you spending some time and effort to put this information together. I once again find myself spending way too much time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worth it!

    April 19, 2013 at 6:13 am | Reply
  7. Pure Leverage | Pure Leverage Review

    When I originally commented I seem to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now whenever a comment is added I receive four emails with the same comment. Perhaps there is a means you are able to remove me from that service? Cheers!

    April 19, 2013 at 8:28 pm | Reply
  8. pletcherhbs

    These types of programs connect to the Internet to download upates and various for other(a) reasons, nonetheless there is one(a) particular proposition file that is needful in set up for these programs to connect to the Internet, and that is angstrom unit DLL (Dynamic Link Library) file called 'Webkit.dll'. Why not jr. than 30? You make this to build credibility and as well to give people A taste of what you will

    searchmobile mobilereverse search

    April 24, 2013 at 7:06 pm | Reply
  9. En ucuz alışveriş

    An impressive share! I have just forwarded this onto a coworker who had been conducting a little research on this. And he in fact bought me dinner simply because I found it for him... lol. So allow me to reword this.... Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending time to discuss this subject here on your web page.

    August 6, 2013 at 7:18 am | Reply
  10. gm tech2

    Its totally brilliant YouTube video with regards to characteristics, really fastidious, its quality is really appreciable.
    gm tech2 http://xinzixun88.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=279524

    August 9, 2013 at 3:19 am | Reply
  11. The significance of mobile statistics information

    Oh my goodness! Amazing article dude! Thank you so much, However I am experiencing problems with your RSS. I don’t understand the reason why I can't subscribe to it. Is there anyone else getting the same RSS problems? Anyone that knows the answer can you kindly respond? Thanx!!

    August 24, 2013 at 5:09 am | Reply
  12. Middle East News

    I was very happy to find this web site.
    I need to to thank you for your time due to this wonderful read!!
    I definitely savored every bit of it and I have you book-marked to look at new stuff in your website.

    October 8, 2013 at 6:29 pm | Reply
  13. Cheap GHDs UK

    http://ghdsukforsale.c-compras.comGHDs UK For Sale http://c-compras.comGHDs UK Outlet http://faxdeposit.comRed Bottom Shoes http://coiffureandstyle.com/nikefreeruns.phpTiffany Blue Nike http://kobe8shoes.vipdiscount.bizNike Kobe 8
    Cheap GHDs UK http://ghdsukforsale.c-compras.com

    November 27, 2013 at 11:20 pm | Reply
  14. nike free gul

    "Personalmente sono sempre statligt pensando di vendetta e ora semplicemente icke pu貌 essere raggiunto, poi io qual 猫 il significato dellavita" Wu Qingqing, icke potrebbe scoppiare i pianto!
    nike free gul http://www.knoxvilletnrealestateblog.com

    December 1, 2013 at 8:28 am | Reply
1 2

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,058 other followers