By Madhav Nalapat, Special to CNN
Editor’s note: Madhav Nalapat holds the UNESCO Peace Chair at Manipal University in India. The views expressed are his own.
Despite the 2008 economic crash and lingering possibility of a Eurozone collapse, the West still clings to its one-size-fits-all mentality – especially when it comes to political systems. Democracy is still almost inevitably defined in terms of the Western model, with periodic elections to choose representatives to a parliament or head of state. Local variants, such as Afghanistan’s Loya Jirga system, are dismissed as not really democratic. But this “universalization” of the Western approach – especially for countries embarking on the path of democratization – is misguided.
I was an early believer in the Middle East democracy project, with the caveat that first there needs to be a comprehensive reform of school curricula. The present fare offered to young minds, especially in Saudi Arabia, is a mishmash of confused ideas cloaked in theology. The result is that the education system fosters minds that are in many cases unable to properly grasp reality, ones that instead too often focus on vague concepts that get superimposed onto the real world. It’s little wonder that conspiracy theories are so prevalent in the region.
The deepening of democracy within the Middle East should therefore start in the classroom, not the ballot box. Yet the reality is that this can best be done by a ruling elite free of the fear of the vote. This is not to argue that democracy is ultimately harmful, but merely to suggest that the proper societal and economic foundations should be laid first.
More from GPS: Don't lose hope over Arab Spring
Rather than looking toward the U.S. or French models, states within the Arab world would be better off looking east, and drawing some lessons from the experience of South Korea and Taiwan, which set in place the forward-looking structures necessary for economic success before subjecting rulers to the ballot box.
Indeed, one need not look very far to see the dangers of doing otherwise – Egypt highlights the consequences of transitioning to a Western-style democratic model without an intermediate period of building up institutions and mindsets promoting democratic values. Although elected by the public, President Mohamed Morsy is a prisoner of conventional Egyptian experience, with the only departure from his predecessor being that he sees the Muslim Brotherhood as the natural core of governance, rather than the military-security apparatus patronized by Hosni Mubarak. So long as Morsy persists with such an approach to governance, Egypt is likely to continue on its present unstable path.
Likewise, the ruling family in another Middle East giant, Saudi Arabia, needs to abandon its longstanding policy of pandering to extreme religious interests and switch support to the modernizers. To a certain extent, King Abdullah has already embarked on such a path, but it is at far too stately a pace, one that needs to be accelerated if the kingdom is to survive the aftershocks of the unfolding disaster in Syria.
Finally, while Moammar Gadhafi was reprehensible while alive, his fall has had disastrous consequences for his country, with arms from Libya flowing to groups that are ideological cousins of the Taliban.
Democracy is a beverage best served diluted, at least until the body gets accustomed to its headiness. Sometimes the processes of democracy are used by the many to trample on the rights of the few, something seen not just in the Middle East but in faraway Malaysia, where halal food dominates despite a third of the population being Christian, Hindu or Buddhist. Yet despite its relative economic prosperity, Malaysia’s religious tensions also point to future strife and even conflict.
For long term stability, countries must take the long view and allow a period for the introduction of secular and rational curricula in schools, the creation of institutions that conform to democratic norms, and the awakening of minds numbed by the ceaseless barrage of, for example, Wahabi cant.
Until such a period of adjustment takes place in the Middle East, democracy taken neat will do enormous harm to the nation drinking it.
I'm ashamed of my government's absolute ignorance and stupidity in supporting these islamist Fascist terrorists in their backhand arms deliveries. Is this another stupid adventure somehow linked to israel..... Absolute insanity if it is. The current Syrian government has the largest vote from a secular and tolerant population. What will inevitably happen is another cultural destruction , replaced by 7th century Fascism and a danger for the whole world. One day these evils will reach the USA.
We know that what works for Walmart won't necessarily work for Target. What makes us suppose the American styled democracy (that isn't working anymore in America) will be of value elsewhere? Firstly, we need a brain.
This is for James, do we suffer from erratic governments that bomb our own people, when you wake up in a western democracy, you don't have to worry about your neighbours bombing you because you do not share the same ideological bent as him. These freedoms we enjoy came at high cost and no doubt the middle east will pay a high price for peace within their own countries, no democracy is perfect and most are changing everyday. The one thing democracy allows is change, if that were not the case they would have failed long ago. There seems to be no willingness to change, as I've written before, the Sunnie, Sheite, or Shia and Salafists have to learn to live together in peace, before any real change will occur.
True, the pure form of any substance might not always serve the purpose that it should. Gold and other precious metals need an alloy, if a goldsmith wants to make a piece of juwelry out of them.
Democracy without trials and failures is just an empty word.
One very important point that has not been mentioned here!
What is Democracy? A goal to be achieved or a means to achieve an 'as smooth as now possible' functioning of the society?
If we consider it a goal (I disagree with this position) then we must make a rational choice (is it affordable?) and act accordingly.
If we realize it is nothing but the best (to date) way of making decisions on a social scale then Madhav Nalapat is right and we must prepare the social organism before forcing 'neat democracy' down its throat.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,852 other followers