By Elizabeth Economy, Special to CNN
Editor’s note: Elizabeth Economy is C.V. Starr senior fellow and director of Asia Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. The views expressed are her own.
Presidential summits between the United States and China have become disappointingly predictable. Before every summit there is a sense of anticipation. What issues will be at the top of the agenda? What new agreements might be reached? How will the two presidents get along? During the summit, news is scant. There are hints of common purpose, but mostly there are admissions of significant differences. And then, inevitably, there is the post-summit letdown. The issues were the same as always. The leaders didn’t really get along (although no one quite says that). And new agreements were never in the cards.
It is possible for President Barack Obama and President Xi Jinping to break this summit stalemate when they meet on June 7 to 8 at the Sunnylands estate in California. To do so, however, will require flipping the summit process on its head. Rather than working toward agreement across all the areas of conflict before them – which after all will take years not days of negotiation – the two presidents need to begin by headlining what in the U.S.-China relationship actually works and then delivering that message to the American and Chinese publics.
It won’t be easy. The record of shared success is slim. Nonetheless, Presidents Xi and Obama could begin by reviewing the thirty years of growing trade and investment that has made the two countries each other’s second largest trading partners. People in the United States have benefited from China’s investment in U.S. treasuries, from low-cost Chinese consumer goods (often for U.S. brands, thereby benefiting U.S. companies and shareholders), and increasingly, albeit slowly, from Chinese investment in the United States and rising U.S. exports to China.
More from GPS: Does upsetting China matter?
The Chinese people, in turn, have gained enormously from U.S. investment in their country, as well as the transfer of technology and management know-how. From there, the two presidents should lay out a path forward for growing the economic relationship, including concrete steps toward a bilateral investment treaty and free trade agreement. Of course, there are serious problems and legitimate gripes on both sides, but the trade and investment story is nonetheless a compelling one, and the best the two presidents have.
There are a few other areas where consensus may be emerging, and if real, Xi and Obama should highlight them during their time at Sunnylands: China’s stance on North Korea has inched closer to that of the United States, Japan, and South Korea; the Chinese have indicated an interest in joining the Transpacific Partnership negotiations, an agreement some Chinese analysts previously described as designed deliberately to exclude Beijing; and there has been a preliminary announcement that China will adopt a hard target for CO2 emissions reduction, something it has refused to consider for more than twenty years.
But there is no sweeping under the carpet all the problems in the U.S.-China relationship – they far outnumber any potential list of wins that could be mustered. Moreover, new areas of friction emerge daily as China asserts its economic and strategic interests in ways that upend the international norms and institutions that have prevailed since World War II. Attempts to promote ideas about a G-2 or “new relationship among the major powers” are therefore premature and should wait until the effort to develop a win-win story becomes more effortless.
Still, if the United States and China are to begin to address the trust deficit that so many commentators in both countries have noted, the two presidents will have to tell their people not only why the relationship matters but also, more importantly, why it works.
No China this time. USA are economically not performing well, according to international standards, and should not try the move to do business with Chinese. USA needs refocus its orientation on US friendly markets and US alliances.
Gee Mike, what a dumb comment yours is. Without China financing a large part of our huge deficit, our economy may well collapse!
Investing in less than 30% of our debt, is not any kind of dependency - whatsoever. Chinese propaganda is cute, though.
One way China can prove its openess towards the West, would be to give back Hong Kong to Great Britain. That way, the West, would regain its face in the Asian world, and some limited business would be possible again.
Hey, go home and read some history before comments on Hong Kong. You'd rather say UK should recover all the torretories it had 200 years ago.
If this is true, that US economy would collapse without China, then it needs to collapse. European Union, the West and NATO alliance, want and expect something else from USA. We want western-oriented USA, no China, over there.
That's utterly absurd, but good propaganda. There is no danger of that. How can we be dependent upon a county that holds a massive trade surplus with us?
Gee Jonquil, aren't you ashamed of your ignorant posts here? I would if I were you! Then again, a lot of people are dumb enough to agree with you, sadly enough!
It's difficult to predict the outcome of this meeting at Sunnylands. The two leaders try to avoid talking points and instead play by ear.
Many Chinese believe Obama needs Xi more than the other way round.
looking at all this posts, cant believe how ignorant some of the americans are. gg for usa
Things to discuss:
-Guantanamo Bay prisoners
-US Troops in Middle East
-Illegal Immigrant's human right violation
-American pedophiles in Caribbean and Asia
-Native American self-rule
This meeting remains one of the significant political events of the decade thus far; it will provide the political echleon of both countries a unique opportunity to greatly enhance a long, though an often tenuous friendship. I think it also highlights China's status as a major power in the international system, and a responsible stake holder in global goverance.
It also marks an opportunity for President Obama to persuade President Xi Xinping and other senior leaders to achieve greater integration in the international system. Whats more, it opens an opportunity for China's paramount leaderto dismmiss claims by US hawkes that China's rise is anything, but revisionist. I expect good things to eminate from this meeting. The shape of the internationall system in the 21st century remains pivotal on the continual friendship between these two great nation. The purpose of this meeting cannot be derailed by those on either side who desparately remainlockd in the politics of the Cold War era.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,862 other followers