By Stijn Hoorens, Special to CNN
Editor’s note: Stijn Hoorens is associate director and head of the Brussels office of RAND Europe. The views expressed are the writer’s own.
Prince George, the first child of Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge, arrived last week, an event watched with king-sized anticipation across the globe. The royal birth comes at a time when fertility in Britain is increasing after decades of decline. Today, the U.K.’s total fertility rate, a proxy for the average number of children per women in a given year, is the third highest in Europe behind only France and Ireland. Is Britain on the cusp of a baby boom?
Fertility rates across Europe declined year-on-year between the post-war baby boom and the end of the 1990s. Europe’s total fertility rates dropped in most countries below the threshold needed to maintain a stable population, the so-called “replacement level” of 2.1 children per woman. But the dawn of the new century saw the declines cease and birth rates actually began to trend upwards in many countries, including the U.K.
And, while fertility rates in some European countries have resumed their downward trajectory in the last couple of years, Britain stands out as an exception, a place where a baby boom may well be taking shape.
In 1997, the total fertility rate in the U.K. had declined to 1.64. For context, with a fertility rate of 1.5 a country’s population would halve within seven decades. By 2008, however, the birth rate in the U.K. had jumped to 1.97 – and it has stayed in that vicinity since.
More from CNN: Americans having fewer babies
Between 2010 and 2011, however, the fertility rate dropped in 24 out of 31 European countries. The Dutch statistical office, for example, has just announced its lowest birth rate since the 1980s.
There are many factors that affect fertility rates, including economic conditions, female education and employment, housing, biological factors, immigration and public policy, including government incentives like tax breaks for families with kids. And the factors at play in one European country may not be exerting influence elsewhere. The uncertain economic conditions in Europe are thought to be the main reason for couples, primarily young adults, to postpone having a baby.
So why do British couples have more babies then those in other European countries?
There are several potential reasons. The number of younger mothers has stopped decreasing and there are now more mothers in their twenties than there were a few years ago. At the same time, the number of older moms is continuing to increase as women born in the 1960s and 1970s are having children now after having postponed childbirth. Young adults in the U.K., it appears, are less concerned about the costs and risks of family expansion then elsewhere. The reason for this may be found in the flexibility of the U.K. labor market or the relatively modest cuts in family policies vis-à-vis other EU countries.
Migrant fertility is also commonly cited in popular media as one of the reasons for Britain’s baby boom, but this cannot explain the rise in period fertility. These rates are largely driven by women born in the U.K., who make up the lion’s share of women of childbearing age. Moreover, the expansion of foreign-born women in recent years is primarily due to migrants from Central and Eastern Europe, whose fertility tends to be lower than that of British women.
Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge, is one of those women born in the U.K. And Prince George is one of the latest pieces of evidence that fertility is back in style in Britain.
Wow what a vacant and pointless article
In the face of coups, global corruption, and surveillance programs on a massive scale in countries that claim to be "free", this news article is obviously very important.
Great to read some substantive analysis on CNN and especially from RAND Europe. Would be interesting to see if the pattern holds over the long term.
All Europe needs a baby boom or else get taken over by Muslims in 20 years
About 2,200 other babies are born each day in the UK, more births than Britain has seen since 1971. However, the figure is currently 1.94 – up from 1.64 a decade ago – but still well below the figure for 1964 of 2.93. Nevertheless it's still a enviable figure, compared to the OECD-countries, in which many young people fear the economic burden in times of uncertainty, or in places like Singapore, where young women fear losing their freedom.
I have been examinating out a few of your stories and i can claim nice stuff. I will surely bookmark your website.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,862 other followers