Is Mugabe a classic strong man?
August 3rd, 2013
11:45 PM ET

Is Mugabe a classic strong man?

By Inesha Premaratne

Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe has been officially named the winner of elections held Wednesday. GPS Intern Inesha Premaratne speaks with John Campbell, senior fellow for Africa Policy Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former ambassador to Nigeria, for his take on the results and what they mean for Zimbabwe.

Can you give us some background on the election? Who were the major players? Why is this race so important to Zimbabwe right now?

The two leading candidates were Robert Mugabe who led the liberation struggle that resulted in Zimbabwe’s independence, and Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the opposition MDC and premier in the just-concluded government of national unity. Mugabe’s political party is the Zimbabwe African National Union- Public Front (ZANU-PF). Most Robert Mugabe and ZANU-PF supporters are African peasants living in the countryside who have been the beneficiaries of his land redistribution policies. There’s also an important ethnic component here as the largest ethnic group in the country, the Shona, supports him. On the other hand, Tsvangirai’s party tends to be more urban and more concerned with the rule of law.

The rivalry between the two candidates is also intensely personal. In the last elections in 2008, Tsvangirai probably won the most votes but Mugabe controlled the security services. The result was widespread bloodshed and the intervention by other countries in the region, particularly by South Africa. They imposed a power sharing agreement between Mugabe and Tsvangirai that ended the violence and lasted up until this week’s elections.

Mugabe has been in power for 33 years. Would it be fair to think of him as the classic “African strong man”?

Not necessarily. First of all, he’s 89 years-old and he goes to Singapore for medical treatment all the time. The policy community is in fact divided on the question of whether Mugabe himself is actually running things or whether he is essentially a front for the security services and the army. Some fear that it’s actually a fairly shadowy group of generals and senior police who are running the country – not through institutionalized military rule, but rather as individuals who have often enriched themselves through access to diamonds and seized formerly white-owned farmland. So we can’t take as a given that Mugabe is a traditional African strong man.

In your view, how did the voting on Wednesday go? Were these elections a sham?

Mugabe wouldn’t allow any Western election observers in the country; the only election observers came from African organizations or other African states. Traditionally, Africans are extremely reluctant to criticize elections that take place in other African countries. Far more credible are the observations of Zimbabwe’s Elections Support Networks. This is an umbrella organization of Zimbabwean civil society. This group maintains that there are severe and serious shortcomings to the voting. They found that there was manipulation of polling places and voter registrations. So, yes, I think the opposition’s claims that the elections are fixed are quite credible.

What do you see coming out of this? What comes next?

There are a variety of different possibilities. The first is that the Tsvangirai supporters might take to the streets. There might be riots and there might be demonstrations that in turn would provoke a very harsh reaction from the security services. This could set off refugee flows into South Africa and Botswana. This is essentially what happened in 2008. The second possible scenario is that there is no widespread violence or reaction to the elections simply because people will sit back and wait for Mugabe to die. With his death there would be a reopening of the political drama in Zimbabwe.

What does this election mean for Southern Africa? It seems South Africa is one of the major players here.

South Africa is the principle power in the Southern African Development Community and was the country that brokered the power sharing agreement between Mugabe and Tsvangirai in 2008. However, South Africa clearly failed to bring about the political and democratic transformation of Zimbabwe that had been the goal after 2008. If the system in Zimbabwe breaks down, South Africa will once again face a massive influx of refugees that might prove destabilizing in particular localities. This also happened in 2008. As Zimbabweans tend to be relatively well educated, a good many of them got jobs in South Africa. That provoked a wave of xenophobia and was in some instances particularly violent. South Africa has to be concerned that what happened in 2008 doesn’t repeat itself. Alternatively, if nothing happens and the Zimbabweans simply decide to wait until Mugabe dies then nothing will likewise happen in South Africa.

So what’s the overall outlook for Zimbabwe?

I think the short-term outlook is that things will largely stay the same while seething under the surface. There is a possibility that we will see some kind of explosion over the elections of July 31 by the supporters of Tsvangirai.

On the whole, there’s a certain school of thought among some political scientists that elections are better than no elections at all because it helps to slowly but surely develop a somewhat more politically democratic culture. The fact that the elections failed in effect and enabled the Mugabe regime to remain in power is a setback, I think, to the general trend of democratization. That being said, such democratization in Zimbabwe, and Africa at large, will only come about because of Africans themselves and according to their own agenda – not anyone else’s.

Post by:
Topics: Africa

soundoff (38 Responses)
  1. CAGN

    Fareed – we are living at a time when truth does not really matter. However, it you dont mind let me set the record straight. First, I come from the region though I now live in the US. I have friends and relatives in Zimbabwe. Contrary to the western press none of my friends or relatives, even MDC members, believed Mr. Tsvangirai was trusted enough to win this election.

    Second, the ZESN which your correspondent calls credible monitors is actually a group of NGOs supported exclusively by Britain and the EU. Does anyone really believe that these groups would say anything different from what the British wanted to hear. In fact if you look at their argument that the roll in Tsvangirai's stronghold was reduced by 1million people, statistically does not make sense. If you reduce people in somebody's stronghold, that somebody should still win in his stronghold and only affected at national level. Tsvangirai is losing massively even in his stronghold, something that cannot be explained by missing people on the rolls.

    Fareed, I noticed that you were born in India. I dont know how the western media covers India. But I can tell you the painful thing about Africa is that the media does not talk to the people on the ground usually preferring to get opinion of white South Africans.

    I think truth should matter... but then what do I know? This is the western media, anyway.

    August 4, 2013 at 1:05 am | Reply
  2. Reader

    Democracy allows people to write nonsense. I am in Zimbabwe. I live ina Zanu pf stronghold very close to Harare. Zanu pf folks have campaigned using a voters' roll directly to people dead or alive. That means they de-registered MDC supporters, they kept dead voters (they came to our house to inquire on the whereabouts of my dead cousin with a similar surname to ours, and others including one in exile inm USA). 1 million in a country of 12 million couldn't register. 1 million where turned away after names where removed from the register or simply un-registered. Some names appeared multipl times, same address, different but existing IDs. That means John Smith has 5 namesakes in one house with different ID numbers. Zanu pf supporters where bussed inmto MDC territories to vote more than once there. Video evidence is there at 1st TV. 6.4 million voters are registered. Of the 2 million are dead. Subtract the unregistered 1 million and the turned away 1 million u have 4.4 million, most of whom are ghost voters. The only thing to correct here is both contestants have strong shona support and Tsvangirayi has Ndebele support after Ndebeles where killed in a genocide in the 1980s by Zanu army. 3.5 million Zimbabweans are in exile, the can't vote. The contributor before me alleges Morgan's unpopularity, making him either an African Diplomat or a Zanu pf supporter. I only saw 10 people in 2 towns including the capital Harare celebrating a Mugabe victory with a fantastic margin of 400% of the voters. Zanu pf is mega-angry in victroy and MDC is angry in defeat. Tell it like it is, this was the perfect crime. Nothig wrong with Morgan unless you believe Zanu pf propaganda.

    August 4, 2013 at 1:38 am | Reply
  3. Reader

    1 million voters missing ona roll with 3 million living voters my friend does make sense. Especially if 1 million more have failed to register because they are in an urban MDC stronghold. Of 6.4 million on roll 2 million are dead. Numerous more are multiple duplicates. You have to be in Zimbabwe to understand the monumental fraud. The voters' roll was availed literally on election day as a hrad copy contrary to the law which says it should be available in electronic format. I witnessed this daylight from registration to voting. Zanu pf has agreed to remove registration from their hero Tobaiwa Mudeded to the Zimbabwe Election Centre next time

    August 4, 2013 at 1:53 am | Reply
  4. j. von hettlingen

    Capitalising on the sanctions imposed by the West, Mugabe refused to invite Westerners to monitor the polls. The African observers said the elections were "free" without commenting whether they had been fair.
    Mugabe is desperate to stay in power, or else he could be indicted for crimes against humanity. His corrupted cronies want him to stay in power, as they wouldn't be able to help themselves to the country's coffers.
    Tsvangirai accepted the power-sharing deal in 2008 for the sake of Zimbabwe's economy.

    August 4, 2013 at 11:44 am | Reply
    • j. von hettlingen

      The international community should give Mugabe an ultimatum: either new elections or sanctions!

      August 4, 2013 at 4:50 pm | Reply
  5. Spellchecker

    "South Africa is the principal power", meaning primary or foremost, not "principle power" (a "principle" is a statement of belief)....

    August 13, 2013 at 5:08 am | Reply
  6. hangman

    good luck !!!!

    August 13, 2013 at 6:38 am | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.