By Danny Danon, Special to CNN
Editor’s note: Danny Danon is Israel’s deputy defense minister and the author of Israel: The Will to Prevail.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the United States this week has provided yet another reminder of how our country’s “volunteer advisers,” pundits and columnists are always quick to lavish their counsel upon us. Often forgotten once these thoughts of the day are neglected in favor of new topics is how much of this advice is proven by history to be dead wrong.
The Golan Heights and Israel is one such topic worth examining. International focus on Syria today centers on the heinous chemical attacks and its war-torn urban landscapes replete with rubble, bombs and bodies. These are heart wrenching scenes, and in Israel, as everywhere, we pray for a speedy end to this conflict and its wanton destruction. But simmering beneath these tragic headlines has been another key issue that sheds much light on the “value” of the advice Israel’s government receives – the Golan Heights, that slender tract of land along the Israel-Syria border.
The al-Assad regime has withdrawn thousands of its troops from the Syrian side of the Golan, mobilizing them for the defense of Damascus. This has created a power vacuum in the south of the country as the most significant troop redeployment of its kind in 40 years took place from the buffer zone.
The results were quick in coming. The Guardian reports that jihadist fighters, always on the prowl for new fronts from which to attack Israel, have been seeping into this area. The formerly quiet communities of the Golan have since witnessed numerous mortar attacks – erroneous or otherwise – since the army's redeployment.
How did we get here? Until the IDF took the high ground in 1967’s Six-Day War, Syrian gunners relentlessly rained down artillery shells on Israel's northern farmers. But, following Israel’s victory, the Knesset eventually applied full Israeli law to the area in 1981. Israelis moved into the former no-man's land, tourist attractions were created, wineries were established. Most importantly, the tacit agreement for quiet with Syria held firm literally for decades – until today's civil war.
Sadly, as the conflict in Syria has intensified, shells and small arms fire have been directed into Israel by the rebels, some of whom are determined to create a new battlefront for their extremist fight against the Jewish state. Croatia and Japan already withdrew their troops stationed in the area from the U.N. Disengagement Observer Force, and others might follow suit as tensions on the ground continue to heat up.
Taking a step back, it is hard not to recall the incredibly mistaken counsel of assorted pundits and false prophets that appeared intermittently over the past two decades. Even though a more than fragile peace held firm, that did not stop any number of columnists from trying to fix unbroken wagons.
As recently as 2009, noted columnist Nicholas Kristof opined that "the U.S. should focus on a peace deal between Syria and Israel…the path forward is to try to peel Syria away from Iran…Most elements of the Israel-Syria deal were agreed upon years ago, and one of Syria's main aims is better relations with the U.S. That is something that the Obama administration can provide."
And Kristof merely reflected the “current wisdom” that prevailed until al-Assad's own people rose up against the dictator scant months later. Indeed, in the view of many, Syria simply sought to secure peace, while the inflexible Israelis resisted.
As Levant specialist Carsten Wieland, put it in April 2007: “A deal was within close reach in January 2000…that Syria’s President Haffaz al-Assad had made exceptionally far-reaching concessions…but his counterpart, Prime Minister Ehud Barak retreated from compromise on this crucial issue on a commitment to complete (Golan) withdrawal to the borders of 4 June 1967. Syria saw this as a betrayal. These negotiations were a missed opportunity.”
Of course, left of center Israeli commentators also chimed in as time after time, supposed wise men suggested trading the Golan Heights for a cornucopia of elusive benefits.
But to these long-distance advisers, I have but one question: Where would Israel be today had we forged an agreement with al-Assad in Syria and relinquished the high ground that protects our people not only from the chemical weapons of the Ba'athist gunners but al Qaeda terrorists as well?
Clearly, not all advice is bad – sometimes it can be wise and prudent. But as a new round of “suggestions” begins, Israel should pause before deciding how best to respond to the current wisdom.
So many today treat “two states for two people,” Israel and Palestine, as a sacrosanct mission carved in stone, its outcome inevitable. I challenge these counselors to look around at how much our region has changed and ask themselves, might not fresh approaches be wiser than ritualistically repeating old slogans?
The path of least resistance always beckons Israel to take the first step, to hope that surrendering territory might result in actual peace. Yet our experience in withdrawing from Gaza has resulted only in continuous rocket attacks on innocent civilians, and our presumed negotiating partners are divided into the rejectionists of Hamas in Gaza and the feckless chiefs of the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah, neither group even agreeing on how or when to speak to each other.
At the end of the day, Israel has but one course – to shun the current conventional wisdom and the echo chamber of pundits and instead search for pragmatic, workable solutions to our challenges. It is the only way to ensure both the security of our people and the vibrant democracy of our society.
CHILDS SOLD TO HUMAN RACE STUDIES.
100.000 CHILDS IRRADIATED FROM SATELITES SOLD BY ITALIANS AGENCIES.
America is the root of all terror. America has invaded sixty countries since world war 2.
In 1953 America overthrow Iran's democratic government Mohammad Mosaddegh and installed a brutal dictator Shah. America helped Shah of Iran to establish secret police and killed thousands of Iranian people.
During Iran-Iraq war evil America supported Suddam Hossain and killed millions of Iranian people. In 1989, America, is the only country ever, shot down Iran's civilian air plane, killing 290 people.
In 2003,America invaded Iraq and killed 1,000,000+ innocent Iraqi people and 4,000,000+ Iraqi people were displaced.
Now America is a failed state with huge debt. Its debt will be 22 trillion by 2015.
VENEZUELA SACRIFICE HUMAN ZONE.
INMORTAL HUMANS POST TO CNN.
TESTICUL IRRADIATION FROM SATELITES.
THE SAME AGENCIES IN ALL CASES AROUD THE WORLD, DOESENT MATTER SOCIALISM CAPITALISM
WHY WE DENOUNCE.
DOES THE INFORMATION NORMAL?.
DON YOU SEE THE CHINESE BUSINESS .
DON YOU SEE THE CHINESE BUSINESS IN VENEZUELA WE HAVE ALL THE OIL IN THE PLANET.
WE NEED MONEY?.
It's obvious that Israel goes its own way and doesn't take advice from outsiders. The author has nothing to worry about Israel's security. Its military might is the best in a region, surrounded by hostile neighbours. Although the governments in Egypt and Jordan don't have an Islamist agenda, their people sympathise with the Palestinians. Israel has to sought out the Palestinian issue itself one way or other.
Being stronger than any one of your neighbors does not mean that Israel has "nothing to worry about Israel's security". The 9/11 proved it beyond any doubt. Further, Israel will gladly solve the Palestinian issue using the ONLY way possible, peace negotiations, but this will only become possible when the Palestinians will produce leadership ABLE AND WILLING to negotiate a peace agreement and comply with the promises it will make.
That's simply factually untrue. The Egyptian military has received greater US aid than Israel (aid to Israel is mostly loan guarantees and not exclusively military). Unlike 1967 and 1973,, should Egypt decide to invade again, they have a significantly larger military now using the SAME weapons as Israel, US made tanks, F-15.'s and 16's etc.
They also most assuredly DON'T "just go their own way". If they did, they would have bombed Iran years ago, but in deference to the US, they have refrained, and now cannot even if Iran gets a bomb b/c they can't attack while Iran is talking (read lying) to Obama.
The idea that the Jordanian "sympathize" with the Palestinians is a joke. Have you ever heard of "black September"? The Hashemite monarchy despises the Palestinians and renounced all claims to Judea and Samaria, largely to wash their hands of them. Jordan IS the Arab country envisioned in the original 2 state plan of the division of the Mandate.
The Egyptians also despise them which is why they refused the return of Gaza to them when Israel offered it, and why it is an Egyptian blockade of Gaza that is the oppressive one.
I doubt that Egyptian leaders will decide to invade Israel in the near future because they know that they will lose the war and with it they will lose everything they've got after signing a peace agreement with Israel.
Further, Israel IS going its own way and it is the way of peace rather than war. Each and every war Israel was involved in the past was started by its enemies and this trend will continue in the future. If there will be a war with Iran it will only happen because Iran will not leave Israel any other option.
Still further, while the Jordanian Arabs do not exactly love Palestinian Arabs they hate the Jews even more. The same is true for the both sides fighting each other in Syria and in every other Arab country. It does not really matter what was "envisioned" in the British Mandate plans 100 years ago, what happens TODAY is important.
You're right that the Egyptians prefer to keep the Palestinians out of Egypt, however. This being said, however, I do not see how Egyptian blockade of Gaza is more "oppressive" than the Israeli one.
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,858 other followers