CNN speaks with Fareed about his interview this week with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. This is an edited version of the transcript. You can watch the full interview with Rouhani on "Fareed Zakaria GPS" this Sunday at 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. ET on CNN.
Rouhani said that there would be no destruction of existing centrifuges “under any circumstances.” It seems he is going even going further than what his foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, told CNN’s Jim Sciutto this week. What's going on here? Because there could be, potentially, some sort of fundamental disagreement between Iran and the United States.
That's exactly what I worry about. I think you're right. It's the first time an Iranian official – and this is the president – has laid out his vision, if you will, of the final agreement. And what he said to me, what Rouhani said was, look, we intend to have a robust civilian nuclear program. You can have as many inspections as you want, but we are not going to roll back that program. In fact, we're going to expand that program.
Now, that's a very different vision from what the United States has laid out, where they expected significant rollback of the program. They talked about shuttering some of those centrifuges. They talked about dismantling the heavy water reactor at Arak. But he [Rouhani] made clear, categorically, specifically and unequivocally, none of that is going to happen.
So I think we have a train wreck on its way here.
You asked him about U.S.-Iranian relations, confidence building. So where is this U.S.-Iranian relationship heading?
You know, I’m struck by the fact that there is a commitment to negotiation. He reiterated very strongly, we do not intend to have nuclear weapons, we have made it clear it is un-Islamic, it is forbidden, you can have as many inspections as you want.
So there were some positive elements. But the bridge between the two positions, as I say, is so great that you would need a lot of trust. And we have very little. Remember, we've not talked to this country in 34 years. We're just beginning this process. We're not doing it one-on-one.
And as a result, you know, these negotiations – and I've talked to people who have been in them – you don't build a lot of trust when you have so many people in the room. You've got six countries on one side, Iran on the other. It's difficult to imagine this one ending very happily.
On Syria – and the Iranians have a lot of influence on what's going on in Syria – they have a close relationship with the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad. He did say something intriguing to you about elections in Syria and, potentially, some sort of end to the civil war. What did he say?
Well, he was very clear that he supported the al-Assad regime's conception of what's going on there, which is there are a lot of terrorists coming into this country from Saudi Arabia, from Turkey, from places like that. This has to stop.
But then he said, we do believe that there should be free elections in Syria and that is the best way to resolve this.
Now, that is one glimmer of hope, because if there is going to be a political solution in Syria, that is one path by which you could imagine the al-Assad regime either having to share power or actually exiting altogether. It's a slender reed, but it's the first time we've heard any prospect of some kind of political solution which might involve a different political settlement other than al-Assad just staying in power.
And on a totally unrelated matter, in a separate article you just wrote for the new issue of TIME entitled "The Case for Snooping," you make the case that the U.S. has to continue the surveillance program, the NSA surveillance program. What is your bottom line on this?
The bottom line is this: People don't realize we are under constant cyber attack from all over world. The National Nuclear Security Administration, which oversees our civilian nuclear facilities, gets 10 million cyber attacks a day. That's 3.65 billion attacks a year. Now, how do you defend against that?
You cannot defend against cyber terrorism, cyber theft, cyber warfare without allowing the U.S. government some access to the telecom and computer systems. We live in this cyber world and we think it's like a government-free zone. It ain't. If you want freedom, just like in the real world, you're going to have to have police.
Lol @ George, it would probably take a lifetime.
la3ana allah iran wakul al khawana al safween al mojremeen iran is evil killers and helping terrorists hizboallah to ill more than 166 000 in Syria ...evil helping evil down with iran
If this is not an ignorant commentary on Farid Zakaria's part I really don't know what is. He is describing Iran's nuclear "roll back" as destroying some physical stuff. He has no clue as to what he is talking about. His incendiary comment "train wreck" has been repeated ad nauseam, by the war party and neo-cons all over the press. Here is a better read on what the Iran nuke agreement is all about:
Stop pushing for war with Iran, no Americans will be fooled by the captured media and the war party psychophants.
Obama and his government are concentrating on wrong things. Obama went to Russia, Petersburg and meeted the gay leaders there instead of meeting the Russian President, when there wasstill time for talks in this Iran Nuclear bomb issue. He blamed/lied that he cannot meat the Russian president because of the help Russia gave Snowden (that was a very weak leadership). Snowden has done bad things for USA, yes that i can agree, he is very bad, but to start hiding as a great leader of US government that stinks bad, To meet Gays and agree with that kind of living is to have a complete blindness. God distroyed Sodom and Gomorra because of those sins and nowadays Russia is more clear in what is Right and wrong than USA in this case. It is sad that the moral values in US are becoming rotten. Their president today is not a defender of their own country anymore. He tries to please the world gays instead, and sick dictatorship countries instead. The presidents deal with the Iranian issue has no backbone. In their words the Obama administration acts like they are going to go war soon on Iran, Every thing is ready, thats because they want to peace Isreal and they are Liers same as the Iranians are, Obama administration is working closely with Iran to let them get a atomic bomb and people of US believe the obamas. When Obama was visiting Sweden last year He almost excused himself of being a president of USA. I am missing Bush, I wish USA a better president in next run, one who can lead, defend, have morals and have a backbone. God Bless America!
The Global Public Square is where you can make sense of the world every day with insights and explanations from CNN's Fareed Zakaria, leading journalists at CNN, and other international thinkers. Join GPS editor Jason Miks and get informed about global issues, exposed to unique stories, and engaged with diverse and original perspectives.
Every week we bring you in-depth interviews with world leaders, newsmakers and analysts who break down the world's toughest problems.
CNN U.S.: Sundays 10 a.m. & 1 p.m ET | CNN International: Find local times
Buy the GPS mug | Books| Transcripts | Audio
Connect on Facebook | Twitter | GPS@cnn.com
Buy past episodes on iTunes! | Download the audio podcast
Check out all of Fareed's Washington Post columns here:
Obama as a foreign policy president?
Why Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Hillary Clinton's truly hard choice
China's trapped transition
Obama should rethink Syria strategy
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
RSS - Posts
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 4,863 other followers