The successful shortfalls of the Syrian peace talks
February 7th, 2014
09:58 AM ET

The successful shortfalls of the Syrian peace talks

By Tom Perriello, Special to CNN

Editor’s note: Tom Perriello is Center for American Progress Action president. He recently returned from the Turkish side of the Syria boarder, where he conducted interviews with Syrian leaders and refugees. The views expressed are his own.

Expectations were low for the Syrian peace talks that started in Geneva late last month. Indeed, during dozens of interviews with Syrian leaders before talks began, the two words I heard most in reference to the conference were “trap” and “fake.” And I was among the skeptics, concerned that the Geneva process reflected more of a desire by the international community to look like it cared than an actual strategy.

Yet while the initial talks produced no major breakthroughs, they have faltered in surprisingly constructive ways that clarify and advance the difficult choices the international community must face to address the crisis in Syria. And, with the announcement today that Syria will join a second round of peace talks next week, consideration of a course correction on U.S.-Syria policy could prove to be one of the outcomes.

The opening round of talks clarified that Bashar al-Assad and his regime are the primary barrier to peace in Syria. Regime figures lashed out belligerently at United Nations mediators and refused to acknowledge that a civil war was even underway, referring only to their fight against terrorists. But new photographs of the regime’s torture campaigns and the barrel bombs that continue to fall on civilian areas leave little doubt about al-Assad’s willingness to brutalize his own people even while claiming to fight extremists.  Most urgently, the regime backed off initial indications that it might allow humanitarian access to civilians long besieged in Homs.

Still, even as it’s becoming increasingly clear that the al-Assad regime is standing in the way of peace, we are also seeing daylight between Russia and al-Assad.  The al-Assad regime’s outbursts and opposition to humanitarian access has prompted Russia to privately express its growing frustration with its ally. An official from the Russian Foreign Ministry told me Russia is “embarrassed” by the al-Assad regime’s poor showing at Geneva. Even the Syrian Arab Red Crescent took the unusual step of calling out the failure to reach agreement on neutral delivery of humanitarian aid.

This growing distance between Russia and the regime could create real pressure in future talks or increase the chances of a U.N. Security Council Resolution demanding humanitarian corridors in Syria.

The al-Assad regime’s outbursts not only frustrated Russia, but also contradicted international expectations that the Syrian government officials planned “to present themselves as the grown-ups at the peace conference.” Instead, as Anne Barnard noted in the New York Times, “The Syrian officials took offense easily. They berated fellow Syrians, foreign reporters and the head of the United Nations.”

In contrast, it was the opposition – which at first refused to commit to the talks or name its delegates – that ultimately engaged substantively on questions of humanitarian access and a transitional governing body. In fact, it was the opposition that presented itself as a coherent partner for peace. This better-than-expected performance on the diplomatic front from the opposition reinforced new developments on the military front – the armed opposition’s recent declaration of war against al Qaeda factions across northern Syria.

Despite dim prospects for a diplomatic or military breakthrough, many of the same Syrian opposition leaders who believed Geneva II was a rigged farce are now telling me they are cautiously optimistic about the international community’s role. However, these same leaders still expect al-Assad to reject any serious steps towards peace. There remains deep distrust and anger among many Syrians at the West’s failure to intervene with force, but Geneva II has begun to rebuild trust in ways that could be reinforced in subsequent rounds, if the West remains steadfast in opposition to the Assad regime and efforts to target civilians with bombs or starvation.

Last year ended with Syria rapidly spiraling toward a worst case scenario: Al Qaeda safe havens across the north, al-Assad bombing and besieging civilians, moderate leaders killed or marginalized, and neighboring allies destabilized. But 2014 has begun with small breakthroughs and reminders that there are Syrians dedicated to a peaceful solution. Geneva II has not produced any concrete political solutions. But it has managed to resuscitate a sense of urgency in finding a post-al-Assad solution for the Syrian people while reaffirming the Syrian opposition coalition as a credible partner.

Post by:
Topics: Syria

soundoff (5 Responses)
  1. Ed Davis

    Tragic situation in Syria. The same internal strife that left other mideast countries in a pile of rubble. Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, and the countries of Arab spring uprising all have pent up despair. Too many families with brutal deathly experiences. The divide between the wealthy and the poor is widening. Bitterness, frustration, and guns are in abundant supply. "Barrel bombs" has entered the world's jargon, devices meant to kill and to frighten civilians.

    February 8, 2014 at 9:13 am | Reply
  2. j. von hettlingen

    Indeed, Assad's representatives at the Geneva II talks were a pack of bums, making preposterous accusations that the West supported terrorists and claiming they had the best interests of the Syrian people at heart. Indeed, the Syrian Alawites, and the minorities that support Assad, but not the Sunnis.

    February 9, 2014 at 12:02 pm | Reply
  3. Mark

    This is but yet another piece of cheap pro-Syrian opposition propaganda, a la CNN. If it doesn't sound appetizing, it is because it isn't... It is no secret that the US Congress has secretly approved funding for US arms deliveries to the "rebels" and that the CIA is actively running terrorist training camps in Jordan, which are infiltrating Syria from the South. Attempted regime change is in full swing, mind you.

    But the US effort is exhibiting ever-increasing levels of flatulence. And don't count on the Russians to do the West's dirty work..

    February 10, 2014 at 7:52 pm | Reply
  4. ahmed

    It seems that America and Europe are not interested in the humanitarian situation of Syrian refugees both inside and outside Syria, the situation has become dramatic in the Yarmouk refugee camp Zaatari and the situation became unbearable http://immigration-us1.blogspot.com/

    February 17, 2014 at 3:33 am | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.