July 2nd, 2014
08:39 AM ET

The return of Muqtada al-Sadr?

For more What in the World watch Sundays at 10 a.m. & 1 p.m. ET on CNN

By Global Public Square staff

It seems that everyone – President Obama, John Kerry, NATO, Grand Ayatollah Sistani, even the Iranian government – has the same advice for the prime minister of Iraq, Nuri al-Maliki: Form a broad-based, inclusive government that reaches out to the Sunnis. That would take away some of the sense of grievance that fuels their support for radical Sunni groups like ISIS that are threatening Iraq's existence as a nation.

So why in the world is al-Maliki flatly refusing to do this?

Partly it's because he’s a hard line Shiite politician himself whose party draws its support from the Shiites, who are not particularly well disposed to the notion of being nice to the Sunnis, their former overlords.

But it's probably at least as much because al-Maliki needs to worry about radical Shiites as much as radical Sunnis. You see, he has his own Tea Party. And this one has an army of its own.

Last month, members of the group (formerly called the "Mahdi Army," now called the "Peace Brigades") paraded through the streets of Baghdad by the tens of thousands, displaying their readiness to supposedly protect holy sites and shrines. The group's name might be new, but its leader is a well-known figure in Iraq and dominated the U.S. media during the American occupation.

Remember the name Muqtada al-Sadr? He’s the radical Shiite cleric who fiercely opposed the U.S. occupation of Iraq.Back then the Mahdi Army was responsible for some of the deadliest days of the war.

Then he overplayed his hand.

The U.S. got other Shiite leaders to turn on him, issue an arrest warrant, and in 2007 he fled to Iran, where he sought exile and supposedly studied theology. But when he returned in 2011, his followers remained loyal to him, and he wields real political power in Iraq.

Al-Maliki got to keep his job as prime minister after an inconclusive election in 2010 largely because Muqtada al-Sadr helped him to build a coalition, thereby ending months of political deadlock.Since then, al-Sadr has called al-Maliki a "dictator" and – in a very surprising twist – recently added pressure on him to step down by calling for the creation of a new emergency government, right after Maliki rejected the idea.

Al-Sadr urged the Iraqi government to incorporate "moderate Sunnis, who have been marginalized" in order to quell the bloodshed.Now, al-Sadr appears to be trying to become the new power broker of Iraq, condemning ISIS and the Sunni terrorist groups, but also appealing to moderate Sunnis. Whether or not he succeeds, we are probably witnessing splits in the Shiite coalition, and that can only mean more chaos in an already chaotic situation.

A piece in Foreign Affairs points out that recent events are the re-ignition of the 2006-2007 Iraqi Civil War and that they fit a pattern. Over a third of all ethnic civil wars, the authors say, flair up again within five years. What's more, approximately one third of all power sharing arrangements born out of those conflicts also fail within that time period.  It's true of Angola, Afghanistan and Sri Lanka in history.

And, now it's true of Iraq.

Post by:
Topics: Iraq • What in the World?

soundoff (98 Responses)
  1. Retired Military

    All of these "update" postings are purely a distraction from the commentary. They actually hide comments when viewing from mobile app.

    July 4, 2014 at 4:55 pm | Reply
  2. raymond spada

    "NO Nation benefits from protracted Wars" – Sun Tzu. Haven't the American People had enough trying to "Save" Nations who only want to exterminate each other ? Haven't we expended enough time, treasure, & lives of our brave military to do this all over again ? If America goes back to that snake pit (Iraq), I'm giving up on our "Leaders" in Washington as we have PLENTY of Problems here at HOME !!!!!

    July 5, 2014 at 4:45 pm | Reply
  3. Retired Military

    This is a total disservice to journalism. What could have been a somewhat informative post on the complexity of governance in a fractured Iraq was tarnished by outright partisan political politics – comparing the Tea Party to a terrorist thug and his murderous henchman. There is no credibility in such obtuse subjectivity. The foundations of journalism are objectivity and integrity. GPS and it's Host continue to breach these foundational tenents. That should bring pause to any and all who legitimately want to know the truth. GPS should apologize to its followers for such unprofessionalism. They clearly know better.

    July 5, 2014 at 6:39 pm | Reply
  4. Allan Kinsman©

    I think what goes for knowing in Washington D.C. is often confused with politics in Washington D.C. A fatal error in thinking is a fact in what you believe. Foreign policy seems based upon others want to be like us. American business got China to make all the crap we consume at a cheaper cost to them but not a better price to us. The American I know is beginning to open it's eyesight inward. If we look without being swayed by all the traditional voter distractions we can see a completely different picture.

    July 7, 2014 at 2:10 am | Reply
  5. bit.ly

    I have learn some good stuff here. Definitely value
    bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how so much effort
    you set to make the sort of excellent informative website.

    October 12, 2014 at 2:19 am | Reply
  6. choisir un aspirateur

    Hi there, of course this piece of writing is truly
    pleasant and I have learned lot of things from it regarding blogging.
    thanks.

    January 24, 2015 at 6:20 am | Reply
  7. Cheryl

    It's truly very complex in this busy life to listen news on TV, therefore I only
    use web for that reason, and obtain the most up-to-date news.

    March 29, 2015 at 9:53 am | Reply
  8. Quel est le meilleur tablet

    I every time spent my half an hour to read this blog's articles or reviews everyday
    along with a mug of coffee.

    October 2, 2015 at 11:02 pm | Reply
1 2 3

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.