July 18th, 2014
09:34 AM ET

Fareed Zakaria answers your questions

Watch"Fareed Zakaria GPS," Sundays at 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. ET on CNN

Fareed Zakaria answers readers’ questions on the U.S. role in the world, whether Iraq would have been more stable if Saddam Hussein hadn’t been removed from power, the NSA’s spying on Germany and whether the borders in the Middle East are outdated.

Do you believe there’s a shift toward isolationism in the United States?

I think there’s a shift toward less involvement and engagement in the world. Some of this is unfortunate. It shows up, for example, in the suspicion towards trade, towards immigrants. But for the most part, I think Americans retain a healthy openness to the world and a healthy openness to America being engaged in the world.

When people shout about isolationism, it’s worth remembering that the United States – with the support of the American people – still maintains thousands of troops in foreign countries, in dozens of bases around the world. We have 60 treaty alliances. In many of them we’re committed to the defense of these countries – from Japan, to South Korea, to Germany. That doesn’t seem to me the story of a country that is isolationist and has withdrawn from the world.

But it’s true that from certain heights, especially after 9/11 – where the United States was, in my view, too engaged, and too engaged in the details and nation building operations in many, many parts of the world – we’re drawing back, and that draw back has some public support.

So, I’m not ready to wave the flag of isolationism, I don’t see it. But I do think in some areas there are some troubling signs. The part that worries me most is about trade and people, because the thing that has historically made the United States so strong has been its ability to open itself up to ideas, to people, and then to adapt and adjust and become stronger from that.

Watch the video for all his responses.

Post by:
Topics: GPS Show

soundoff (199 Responses)
  1. Jason Feinman


    I just saw a debate on Obama's presidency with Peter Bienart and Gideon Rose on one side and Elliot Abrams arguing the contrary on your show today. It was fairly obvious who you sided with, with almost no pushback to Bienart and Rose, you're certainly allowed to have your opinion but, it was so obvious that you lack real objectivity and it's very disappointing. I notice you have Peter Bienart on often and you never pushback on what he say's. It would be so interesting if I didn't know where you stood on issues of the day and your were critical of both sides. THATS YOUR JOB!

    August 30, 2015 at 1:45 pm | Reply
  2. jerry johnson

    yet another show of den partisanship….do you really want to throw soft balls to your side and unload spitballs on someone like Abrahams….we get more fair coverage on cnbc…..hard to understand why anyone from center or right would ever guest on your show…….your are simply riot a journalist…a good opinion program for left

    August 30, 2015 at 8:07 pm | Reply
1 2 3 4 5

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,014 other followers