In opposing Obamacare, we were serious the whole time
Protestors hold signs during an anti-health care reform rally August 14, 2009 in San Francisco, California. (Getty Images)
April 2nd, 2012
06:00 AM ET

In opposing Obamacare, we were serious the whole time

Editor’s Note: Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review.  He has been heavily involved in the litigation regarding the Affordable Care Act, including having filed briefs on each of the four issues argued before the Supreme Court last week. 

By Ilya Shapiro - Special to CNN

“Can you create commerce in order to regulate it?”  With those words, Justice Anthony Kennedy sent the legal establishment reeling.

Was the Supreme Court really taking seriously the preposterous claims of the Tea Party-inspired hacks who were suing the federal government?  Was there really a chance that five justices, acting as would-be partisan hacks themselves, would throw out President Obama’s signature achievement?  Could Obamacare, which name everyone is now allowed to use because the administration itself has adopted it, really fall on some technicality about mandating economic activity rather than regulating it when it occurs?

In a word, yes. FULL POST

Post by:
Topics: 2012 Election • Health • Law