Ahmed Rashid on negotiating with the Taliban
Ahmed Rashid in his office in Lahore (Getty Images).
April 20th, 2011
10:27 AM ET

Ahmed Rashid on negotiating with the Taliban

Intrepid Pakistani author and journalist Ahmed Rashid wrote an op-ed in the Financial Times describing the Obama administration's secret decision to ramp up talks with the Afghan Taliban, trying to find a negotiated solution to a decade-long conflict.  In a follow-up phone call, Rashid said that the Obama administration ought to announce these talks publicly and pressure Afghanistan's neighbors to get behind them.

Amar C. Bakshi: What is the shift in U.S. policy toward Afghanistan?

Ahmed Rashid: For a very long time there was a lot of division about whether the U.S.would talk to the Taliban or not. Those divisions have now more or less ended. There is much greater determination to set in motion not just secret talks but everything around it that has to happen.

For example, the Taliban are very keen to open an office somewhere in one of the Gulf countries or maybe Turkey. There is nowU.S.support for that. There would presumably be international support for that also. These are the kinds of steps that are needed to get a political process going.

There is the acknowledgement that an over-dependence on a military strategy is not going to work in the long-term.  Secondly, the economic and international situation is really not in favor of a long-term military strategy.  What is needed now very much is a political strategy. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton herself has said this several times in the past few weeks.

What would a deal with the Taliban look like?

We are a very, very long way away from that. Many questions are being raised. For example, would there be a power-sharing with the present government? How would it take place? How would the constitution accommodate something like that? There are all sorts of social and legal issues about the constitution and Islamic law.

One of the key steps that the Americans have taken is that for the last two years or so, the Obama administration has been talking about preconditions – that the Taliban has to renounce Al Qaeda, accept the constitution and President Karzai. Now what we’re seeing is that talks are going on without any preconditions. These preconditions, or red lines, are something that everyone assumes will be accepted by the Taliban at the end of the talks rather than at the beginning. That is a very positive thing because I don’t think either side could go into their talks with their preconditions.

There are Taliban preconditions that seem to be watered down too because the Taliban were insisting that they wouldn’t talk until the American forces started to leave. But they seem to be willing to put that aside for the time being.

Why is this shift happening now?

The overall international and economic situation is very, very dire. First of all, the majority of European countries want to pull their troops out of Afghanistan as quickly as possible and that includes some of the leading nations like Britain, Germany and Canada.

Economically they can’t do it. They’re cutting their defense budgets. They are in recession.

And secondly the huge expenditure by the Americans themselves: Something like $108 billion is going to be spent on Afghanistan this year on the war effort. This is clearly not sustainable with all the economic crises that President Obama is facing right now.

What can the U.S. do to help make India and Pakistan see eye-to-eye on Afghanistan?

That is obviously a very crucial part of it. The big tussles going on over Afghanistan right now is between India and Pakistan in a battle for influence there.  I think the U.S. needs to play a more upfront role – privately at least – to bring the two countries together if not on the other issues that divide them like Kashmir and larger issues, then certainly on Afghanistan. I think that’s very doable.

The more we get into this endgame and negotiations - the more the world realizes that the Americans are talking to the Taliban - I think it becomes very imperative for both the governments in India and Pakistan to accept the fact that they will have to work with each other if they want to be part of the ultimate equation.

Does Pakistan want to see stability in Afghanistan?

Pakistanis very keen to see stability in Afghanistan. An end to the war in Afghanistan could have a very dramatic effect on containing terrorism inside Pakistan too and containing the Pakistani Taliban. So I think Pakistanis very keen to see stability.

The question at the moment is: If the U.S. is going to take the lead – or the United Nations or whoever we are going to see in the months ahead take the lead on this – they have to bring together all the neighboring countries, of which Pakistan is probably by far the most important, but all of the neighboring countries have to agree to some king of on non-interference in Afghanistan.

Tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia are being exacerbated by upheavals throughout the Middle East.  How might Saudi Arabia and Iran see eye-to-eye in Afghanistan?

For the last 30 years, Saudi Arabia and Iran have been rivals in Afghanistan. For example, the Saudis backed the Taliban regime in the 90s. The Iranians very strongly opposed it.

The point right now is that with the tensions in the Gulf - the Saudis accusing the Iranians of destabilizing Bahrain and Saudi Arabia– they are both searching for allies.

The Saudis have recently been approaching the Afghans and the Pakistanis to ally with them against Iran. That is something that neither country can afford to do – neitherAfghanistannorPakistan. Secondly, you need the compliance of both Saudi Arabia and Iran for any eventual Afghan peace settlement.

So taking sides on this Iran-Saudi dispute in the region is not a good idea. It is not very helpful, especially if you want to bring the two countries into the peace agreement.

So a major diplomatic lift is needed?

Yes, absolutely.  We’re talking about a huge diplomatic effort, which the former U.S. Af-Pak Special Envoy, Richard Holbrooke, had started. It needs a very big push by the United States, NATO and the European countries.

It needs some public diplomacy. Things need to be done and said in public so that people around the world can see that there is movement on this. As well, of course, a great deal of private diplomacy is needed such as dealing with this Iran-Saudi Arabia issue, bringing India and Pakistan together. A mixture of private and public diplomacy is needed.

We might see some of that public diplomacy in July when President Obama marks the withdrawal of some U.S. troops from Afghanistan.

The quicker the United States gets on with this, the better it is going to be.  One of the big steps it should take in the public realm is admitting that the U.S. is having talks with the Taliban and set out a roadmap as to what the President would like to see. The quicker we see the administration doing this, the faster this process will move.

Post by:
Topics: Afghanistan • India • Pakistan

soundoff (410 Responses)
  1. Amit-Atlanta-USA

    And, here are some more 24 CARAT GOLDEN WORDS by Cyril Almedia quoting Rifaat Hussain and Maleeha Lodhi on WHERE PAKISTAN IS HEADED economically, Jihadically, and with its plans on Nuclear warfare with India!!!

    Aptly ttiled: "MYSTERY OR MADNESS"


    "As India pulls away from us economically and diplomatically, we won’t be able to strategically compete with them. But because India is the enemy, our boys will need to find a way of competing.

    But how? There are essentially two routes, flagged by Rifaat Hussain in his chapter in Maleeha Lodhi’s new book.

    The first, soft, option is to try and put our own house in order: look inwards, reform, fix the security situation, get the economy going again. The quickest route to economic revival would be to trade with India. The second option: double down on the jihad option to ‘balance’ India’s growing power. It’s a tried and tested strategy, it’s low-cost, we already have the infrastructure and to ramp it up would take minimal effort.

    What about the disastrous blowback here that would be all but certain? Doesn’t matter. Remember, India is the enemy.

    Between the soft and hard options, do you want to bet which one our boys will likely pick to compete with India strategically?

    And if that’s not scary enough, try thinking about how long before our boys will be ‘forced’ to choose. Five years? Seven? 10 or 15?

    The Americans and Russians figured out half a century ago that miniature nuclear weapons are a horrible idea. The whole point about nuclear weapons is to act as a deterrent. If you attack my country, I guarantee I’ll visit so much damage on your country in return that you really shouldn’t even think about attacking me.

    And that’s precisely what we’ve claimed our nuclear programme is for. We even refer to it, all chest puffed out and steely-eyed, as credible minimum deterrence. But in the blink of an eye we’ve gone from nuclear weapons as a deterrent to nuclear weapons as an instrument of war.

    Good luck, Pakistan"


    April 29, 2011 at 10:40 am |
  2. lea redmond

    As long as you have a powerful kick, nobody will try to abuse you.

    June 3, 2011 at 1:59 pm |
  3. Ten Star Driver

    Wow this is a really good. Keep up the good work!


    December 2, 2020 at 1:50 am |
  4. Berniece Huckabey

    Terrific article


    December 14, 2020 at 3:51 pm |
  5. Wallace Chiaramonte

    It's hard to say


    December 15, 2020 at 6:00 pm |
  6. Lyman Richberg

    there are lots of cheap home security gadgets that you can buy online these days, i can find most of them from ebay,


    December 20, 2020 at 6:52 pm |
  7. Evan Bartnett

    Hi! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I'm getting tired of WordPress because I've had problems with hackers and I'm looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.


    December 26, 2020 at 12:16 am |
  8. kurtköy bayan escort


    December 28, 2020 at 12:55 pm |
  9. Genaro Mackowski

    Fantastic website. A lot of helpful info here. I am sending it to some pals ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thank you on your sweat!


    December 31, 2020 at 1:46 pm |
  10. Sevier Vapor

    Has anyone ever visited Henley Vaporium? x


    January 2, 2021 at 7:43 pm |
  11. Mickey

    What's Going ɗown i'm new to this, I stumbled
    upon this I have found It рositively useful and it has aided me out loads.
    I'm hoping to give a contribution & help other users like
    іts aided mе. Good job.

    my web blog – tedium

    January 5, 2021 at 12:37 pm |
  12. cbdmd cbd oil how many doses in a bottle?

    Hi everyone , can anyone recommend where I can purchase Natural Strawberry CBD Tincture By El Gallo?


    January 5, 2021 at 3:27 pm |
  13. protective face masks

    I like this and foundit helpful.


    January 6, 2021 at 3:56 am |
  14. How Long Does Lost Vape Orion Pods Last

    Why Are Nicotine Salts So Much Better


    January 7, 2021 at 9:29 am |
  15. Lorena

    That is a ᴠery good tip particularly to those fresh to the blоgosphere.
    Short but very aϲcurate info… Many thanks
    for sharing this one. A must read post!

    Visit my ԝeb site :: connoting

    January 10, 2021 at 8:28 pm |
  16. Fedele

    can you vape after you get your wisdom teeth out


    January 12, 2021 at 10:23 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.