Iraqis don't want their country broken up
July 16th, 2014
10:57 AM ET

Iraqis don't want their country broken up

By Amal Mudallali, Special to CNN

Editor's note: Amal Mudallali is a senior scholar at the Wilson Center. The views expressed are her own.

The conventional wisdom in Washington is that Iraq is heading for partition. The argument is that Iraq is on the cusp of being broken into three states: a Sunni, a Shiite, and a Kurdish state to replace the current state of Iraq. But while many of the proponents of this view contend that the Iraqis themselves want this because they simply cannot live together, I believe nothing could be further from the truth.

Sunni Iraqis do not want to be separate, they want to be equal. And for the Shiite Iraqis, the definition of equal is for Iraq to remain whole, but under a Shiite-dominated government. These views may appear somewhat inconsistent, but a regional and international coalition that sees the dangers of dismembering Iraq two sides should be able to help them walk back from their positions.

I know this is possible because Lebanon, another Arab country that suffered a bloody 15 year civil war, managed to step back from the abyss through a political settlement. Thirty years after the end of that civil war, and despite the suicide bombings that have blighted the country in recent months, Lebanon is still united.

Of course, Iraq faces its own, specific challenges. Sunnis cannot forget that they once ruled the country through a strong man, and the Shiites cannot bury their grievances over the Saddam Hussein era. Meanwhile, it is clear that the sectarian system that became the unintended consequence of the U.S. invasion of Iraq from 2003 isn’t capable of building a new Iraq, and is instead a recipe for continued civil wars.

These shortcomings were compounded by the sectarian and dictatorial tendencies of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and the political class that surrounds him. Under the al-Maliki view, the Sunnis were to pay for all the sins of the Saddam era, so instead of bringing them under the big Iraqi tent, his regime pushed them to the margins.

As a result, Iraq’s Sunnis have for the past 18 months been in near constant revolt while Washington seemed to be looking the other way. They conducted sit-ins, but instead of addressing their grievances, the al-Maliki government responded with bombs, killing dozens in the process. Such policies drove Sunnis into the arms of radical Islamist groups and ultimately to a temporary alliance with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

The militants’ seizure of Mosul and other Sunni strongholds should therefore not have surprised anyone in Washington. What was surprising was the belief that what has not worked for most of the past decade will somehow work now. The rush in advocating a military and security solution, as al-Maliki has done, won’t resolve Iraq’s problems – security only approach won’t be enough to bring all the components of Iraqi society together.

What is needed is a political solution that keeps Iraq whole, including ensuring the Kurds are an integral part of the country. And the Kurds are not only patient but also realistic – they know the current regional restraints on Kurdish independence and recognize they will be best served by a new Iraqi leadership that keeps its commitments to them.

For the Sunnis, living in a united Iraq is better than the alternative – existing in an extremist and oil poor caliphate, as Iraqi oil is concentrated in the Shiite south (comprising 70 percent to 80 percent of Iraq’s oil reserves) and the Kurdish areas. In addition, it is hard to imagine that Sunni Iraqis – politically or culturally – would prefer to leave a united Iraq. After all, Baghdad is not just the current capital for Sunnis and Shiites alike – it has a rich identity and history.

Fighting extremism is important for Iraq’s stability, but it will not bring unity and it cannot be done by Shiites alone. The Sunnis have to be part of the fight if Iraq is to stay one country.

So where do we go from here?

Iraq’s Sunnis are by no means all behind ISIS, but they are caught between the rock that is the al-Maliki government and the hard place of the new caliphate of ISIS. Time is therefore not on Iraq’s side, and any delay in forming a new government with a fresh face plays into the hands of al-Maliki and those who have used his intransigence as an excuse to split the country.

A good recent sign that Iraqis are determined to step back from the chaos is the election of Salim al-Jabouri as the new speaker in parliament. His election is the first step in a political process to forming a new government and illustrates that the Sunnis can accept a compromise, as they had previously made the departure of al-Maliki a precondition of joining the political process. The Sunnis apparently prefer to stick with the Iraqi state that they know over the unknown of the Islamic state.

Yet despite the majority of the Shiite leadership in Iraq, including the religious Shiite leadership, wanting a new government, a major obstacle remains in the way of convincing al-Maliki that his time is up: Iran. Sadly, Iranian support for al-Maliki is mirroring Tehran’s support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Syria, Iraq, and even Lebanon now appear to be viewed by Tehran as a single theater of operations in which to challenge the West.

The Obama administration has sent the right message to Iraq by encouraging the formation of a government of national unity and inclusiveness. But the United States must not allow itself to again get embroiled militarily in an Iraqi civil war. Instead, this should be viewed as a political fight to try to put Iraq back on the right track in a way it failed to a decade ago.

It isn’t too late to save Iraq, but this cannot happen by tearing it apart. The Arabs still feel betrayed by the Sykes-Picot Agreement that split them into states nearly one hundred years ago. Dividing them into tribes and sects with flags today would be the ultimate betrayal.

Post by:
Topics: Iraq • Middle East • Syria

soundoff (68 Responses)
  1. MEStudent

    The Kurds, for one, do want their country broken up. For everyone who is saying the Kurds have just been innocent victims in Iraq, that’s not true. The Kurds have had their own place in the battle with Iraq. With that said, they do want their freedom and they have more than shown that they can handle their own state. The Kurdish region is a place where many religious and ethnic groups can live peacefully together while maintaining good relations with the rest of us. Their alliance with the west is part of the reason they have been taking attack, how about we stop providing them military aid and start helping them get their independence? #MES20

    November 18, 2014 at 9:37 pm |
  2. 13th Legion

    To all concerned; the United States was not involved in Sykes-Picot Agreement. In face we did not become formal allies of England and France until after the agreement. It should also be pointed out that before Sykes-Picot the "Arab" lands in question, along with Jordan, Lebanon, and most of Egypt, were under Ottoman (Turkish) control. They were neither independent nor free. The Rashidian Emirate occupied much of present day Saudi Arabia and very little of southern Iraq
    While one might argue that Sykes-Picot boundaries were ill-conceived, and were more about English, French, and Russian control, it also removed control by the Ottoman Empire.
    It is Turkey and our desire to keep them as Allies which will prevent the formation of any Kurdistan in any part of Iraq. The Turks and Iran are both adamantly opposed to a Kurdish State as both have large Kurdish populations. It is this balancing act that we attempt to maintain primarily to prevent any one of these populations from allying itself with Russia and yes control of oil in the region.
    I do believe U.S. Government motivations are not so much about Freedom and Democracy as it is about protection of Commerce. The U.S. would not have an issue with a break up of Iraq or a new Islamic State if it could guarantee that the new Sunni state and Shiite controlled southern Iraq would both be allied politically with the U.S. as opposed to Iran or Russia. It is this position of fear not strength that keeps the U.S. involved in the Middle East.
    Just like Sykes-Picot, the motivations are far from admirable, but some byproducts such as; removal of the Ottoman Empire control then and now, possibly free elections, equality for women, protection and education for children, and so on, may result from our otherwise dubious involvement.

    January 4, 2015 at 1:56 pm |
  3. john2047

    Any thought of Iraqi rapprochement is utterly farcical as the current madness metastasizes.

    April 14, 2015 at 6:47 pm |
  4. John M. Bays

    I "LIKE THIS GUY" – His "Take On Things" is an "Intelligent" Look through the "Jewler's Eye". He "Sees" the realities.

    August 9, 2015 at 4:43 pm |
  5. Joe Christensen

    Fareed, I really wish you were honest in your reporting. It is people like you, that's stear people to vote the way they do. To say Trump wants to ban all Muslims is incorrect. If you would show ten more seconds of the clip, he would say, until we can find out who these people are, that we just let in. You cannot absolutely believe everyone, just because they say they want asylum. You actually have to verify that they are freeing persecution. There are people out there that will not tell the truth. You, unfortunately are one of them. We stopped immigration from west Africa during the Ebola, so people wouldn't get sick. I didn't hear you say anything about that as racist. If Trump can stop one terrorist, by finding out their true intention, so be it. Please start reporting everything, and not part of what someone says. It really makes you look like a racist yourself. Thank you

    May 15, 2016 at 10:42 am |
  6. Eddie Fonseca

    Paula Abdul the famous Iraqi American singer who has may great songs in the 90's, as many young Americans like myself who went to high school in the 90's and had a Much Music Dance Party, we have all seen one time or another seen a Paula Abdul song when she struts her stuff across screens across high schools in America. She would agree that Iraqi's would not want their country broken up by radical groups such as ISIS and air strikes by Israel fighting a twenty year old war with them. So how do we as American's and the rest of the world bring peace to the Iraqis here is the thing, we need to come up with a plan that does not losing our great men and women in the US Airforce and US Military in some foreign country to forge peace in the Middle East. We need to teach the art of International Diplomacy to the Iraq and the rest of the Middle East, and our great nation and our Allies be there for support if things go south then we should use our great Military for support not to kill innocent men and women and children in the Middle East to hunt people who bring harm to innocent Americans.

    June 18, 2016 at 10:06 pm |
    • Rick Jays

      Most of your information is wrong you need to do your homework well, PA is not from Iraq and so on about the rest of your information.

      September 24, 2017 at 8:47 am |
  7. bv1946


    September 25, 2016 at 3:27 am |
  8. [url=]Don9ja[/url]

    October 15, 2018 at 5:53 pm |
  9. ken

    good piece

    May 27, 2019 at 12:18 pm |
  10. alshami

    Yes keep it in one piece ,

    June 9, 2019 at 6:49 pm |
  11. bpoeihp7spvdxwhclser

    Iraq is a country with different believes. But they need to be united.

    September 3, 2019 at 10:46 pm |
  12. thomaswilliam

    January 9, 2020 at 12:24 am |
  13. mens ed pills

    erectile cure
    help with erectile dysfunction
    erectile booster

    November 27, 2020 at 6:00 pm |
  14. detectives privados castilla de la mancha

    detectives privados formentera

    December 11, 2020 at 11:51 pm |
  15. zortilonrel

    You could certainly see your expertise in the work you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren't afraid to mention how they believe. Always go after your heart. "Billy Almon has all of his inlaw and outlaws here this afternoon." by Jerry Coleman.

    December 17, 2020 at 1:17 pm |
  16. vreyro linomit

    I've been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be a lot more useful than ever before.

    December 23, 2020 at 6:27 pm |
  17. zortilonrel

    Good info. Lucky me I reach on your website by accident, I bookmarked it.

    December 25, 2020 at 9:20 pm |
  18. 700k passive income system

    Imagine getting hundreds of people flooding your inbox on autopilot, 24/7 with 100 percent commissions of $500 a day. This is made thanks to traffic conveyed on autopilot over various “viral tiers”. More details:

    December 26, 2020 at 12:27 pm |
  19. vreyro linomit

    Hello! I just would like to give a huge thumbs up for the great info you have here on this post. I will be coming back to your blog for more soon.

    January 3, 2021 at 6:14 pm |
  20. Concepcion

    It's the truth is very difficult with this busy life to listen news on Television, thus I just use world wide web
    for your purpose, and get the hottest news.

    Look into my website; RossCDannels

    January 3, 2021 at 11:27 pm |
  21. frolep rotrem

    After all, what a great site and informative posts, I will upload inbound link – bookmark this web site? Regards, Reader.

    January 10, 2021 at 8:45 am |
  22. Janae Schrecker

    January 11, 2021 at 2:22 am |
1 2

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.