July 31st, 2014
02:32 PM ET

U.S. must act to prevent regional energy crisis

By Peter Schechter and Jason Marczak, Special to CNN

Editor’s note: Peter Schechter is director and Jason Marczak is deputy director of the Atlantic Council’s Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center. The Center recently published a report titled “Uncertain Energy: The Caribbean’s Gamble with Venezuela.” The views expressed are their own.

Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Caracas last week with a new $4 billion gift for a country desperately looking to external financing to keep its economy afloat. The catch? Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro reportedly must send China an additional 100,000 barrels per day (bpd) of oil in addition to the more than 500,000 bpd of crude it is already providing to China.

With Venezuela’s production in decline, this latest announcement calls into question the long-term viability of Venezuela’s Petrocaribe oil alliance and the energy future for the Caribbean and Central American states that depend on it. The United States must act to proactively prevent a crisis off our shores. Vice President Biden has taken initial steps to lead this effort, but more must be done.

For nearly ten years, some of the United States’ closest neighbors have used Petrocaribe – Venezuela’s financially attractive energy alliance and Chávez’s brainchild – to procure flexible credit terms to purchase crude oil and petroleum products. But Venezuela’s economic situation is dire, putting the benefits of the oil alliance at risk. Central American and Caribbean states will have little recourse if credit dries up, and the alliance’s government ministers, business leaders, and consumer advocates privately fret about how continued dependence on Venezuela for energy supplies might come back to pull the rug from under their economies.

Meanwhile, the United States has entered into an unprecedented energy boom, securing its own energy future. Shale gas has revolutionized U.S. natural gas production, creating a potential for exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) and incentivizing a transformation in the Caribbean’s consumption from fuel oil and diesel to low-carbon natural gas.

The Obama Administration has shown some recognition of the threat to the energy matrix so close to U.S. shores, and there is an opportunity for a new, natural gas fueled partnership. Vice President Biden’s announcement of the Caribbean Energy Security Initiative (CESI) last month is a step in the right direction. But, the initiative fails to include all of the policy options at the United States’ disposal – the most important one potentially being natural gas.

The United States must go beyond aspiring for renewables to comprise a large share of the Caribbean’s long-term energy mix. Instead, it must recognize the near-term role that natural gas could play in reforming the Caribbean region’s economies and in weaning states off an overreliance on Venezuelan oil.

This will require leadership, and the United States must therefore push for a forward-thinking, multilateral strategy redesign that can help Central American and Caribbean countries reduce debt, energy costs, and their own carbon footprint. This requires buy-in from and coordination with local governments, the private sector, and international lending institutions.

The perils of inaction that await Petrocaribe member states are profound – but now they have no other option. This is a once-in-a-lifetime policy opportunity for the United States and international financial institutions to step up and seize leadership on this issue. The United States must declare LNG and crude oil exports to be in the national interest, a mechanism that would both legalize U.S. crude oil exports and expedite LNG sales. Together with entities like the World Bank, the Obama administration must also provide market signals for energy infrastructure changes that would enable natural gas to move to the forefront of the Caribbean’s fuel usage. Converting the region to natural gas would introduce a cleaner-burning alternative while acting as a bridge to more renewable – but currently technologically- and cost-prohibitive – energy sources.

Such policy shifts would improve U.S. positioning throughout the region. Too often, American foreign policy has appeared anti-Venezuelan instead of pro-Caribbean. Now is the time to change this perception.

Petrocaribe has been a welcome assistance to member states, but Venezuela is in a downward economic spiral, with the threat of devaluation even looming on the horizon. The United States must capitalize on its own oil and gas boom to avoid an energy crisis – and the broader security, economic, and immigration challenges that would bring in the region.

Post by:
Topics: Energy

Next entry »
« Previous entry
soundoff (6 Responses)
  1. Bob

    The other side of this development is the rapidly increasing investments by China in the area – Mexico and Central America. The Chinese are establishing with the governments of Nayarit and Chihuahua, two Mexican states, to build a railroad from the west coast of Mexico through Chihuahua and up to a port of entry to the US at Santa Teresa, New Mexico. In addition, the Chinese are funding the development of a factory to manufacture locomotives and train cars in Chihuahua, and automobiles in Nayarit. We welcome the developments, they bring jobs to Mexico, but we wonder....

    July 31, 2014 at 2:45 pm |
  2. BOMBO

    I feel like a lone voice in the wilderness shouting out "If the US supports Keystone and other projects in Canada and Mexico, the NAFTA region will easily be oil self sufficient." Now I know that the US will lose much of its political leverage if it stops buying oil from countries outside NAFTA, but think about it for a while...no more reasons to get involved militarily in the middle east, Asia, or South America. If you are an "America Firster", isn't this a good thing?

    July 31, 2014 at 7:17 pm |
  3. chri§§y

    Exactly @ BOMBO and it would pay for itself in the money saved from military expenses.

    July 31, 2014 at 7:30 pm |
  4. Shareef Fahmy


    August 15, 2014 at 2:56 pm |
  5. Rudolph Bonefont

    My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs. But he's tryiong none the less. I've been using Movable-type on several websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform. I have heard great things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into it? Any help would be greatly appreciated!


    December 6, 2020 at 9:27 am |

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Next entry »
« Previous entry